Evaluation of tubomanometry as a routine diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction

Schroeder S, Lehmann M, Korbmacher D, Sauzet O, Sudhoff H, Ebmeyer J (2015)
Clinical Otolaryngology 40(6): 691-697.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
; ; ; ; ;
Abstract / Bemerkung
Objective: The objective of this study was to demonstrate the reliability of tubomanometry (TMM) described by Est eve in the diagnosis of chronic obstructive Eustachian tube (ET) dysfunction. Study design: Combined prospective and retrospective clinical study. Setting: Tertiary referral centre, affiliated to university. Methods: Two hundred and fifteen healthy subjects were examined once, 25 healthy subjects underwent TMM weekly for 6 weeks, and six healthy subjects were tested three times a day on at least three different days. The results of tubomanometry in healthy subjects were compared to data obtained from 171 patients with chronic obstructive ET dysfunction. Results: In healthy subjects, there was an immediate opening of the ET at 30-50 mbar with an R-value <= 1 in at least 94% of the cases. In patients with chronic ET dysfunction, an opening of the ET could be registered in only 42% of patients at 30 mbar and in 58% at 50 mbar. The average of the R-value in these subjects always indicated towards a delayed opening (R > 1). When measurements are repeated in the same subject with a weekly interval, the intraclass correlation (ICC) was 0.49 for the TMM with 30 mbar, 0.51 for the TMM with 40 mbar and 0.52 for the TMM with 50 mbar in healthy people. For the patients with symptoms of ET dysfunction, the ICC for up to four repeated measures was 0.50 for the TMM with 30 mbar, 0.53 for the TMM with 40 mbar and 0.54 for the TMM with 50 mbar. A complete agreement of the results in repeated measurements within seconds was present in 86% for 30 and 40 mbar and in 79% for 50 mbar. The ICC was 0.61 for the TMM with 50 mbar, 0.62 for the TMM with 40 mbar and 0.68 for the TMM with 30 mbar. Conclusions: Tubomanometry can support the diagnosis of ET dysfunction. An R-value <= 1 indicates a regular function of the ET, an R-value > 1 indicates a delayed opening of the ET, and no definable R-value means no detectable opening of the ET. TMM is a reliable and valid instrument to support the diagnosis of chronic obstructive ET dysfunction.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Clinical Otolaryngology
Band
40
Ausgabe
6
Seite(n)
691-697
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Schroeder S, Lehmann M, Korbmacher D, Sauzet O, Sudhoff H, Ebmeyer J. Evaluation of tubomanometry as a routine diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction. Clinical Otolaryngology. 2015;40(6):691-697.
Schroeder, S., Lehmann, M., Korbmacher, D., Sauzet, O., Sudhoff, H., & Ebmeyer, J. (2015). Evaluation of tubomanometry as a routine diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction. Clinical Otolaryngology, 40(6), 691-697. doi:10.1111/coa.12451
Schroeder, S., Lehmann, M., Korbmacher, D., Sauzet, O., Sudhoff, H., and Ebmeyer, J. (2015). Evaluation of tubomanometry as a routine diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction. Clinical Otolaryngology 40, 691-697.
Schroeder, S., et al., 2015. Evaluation of tubomanometry as a routine diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction. Clinical Otolaryngology, 40(6), p 691-697.
S. Schroeder, et al., “Evaluation of tubomanometry as a routine diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction”, Clinical Otolaryngology, vol. 40, 2015, pp. 691-697.
Schroeder, S., Lehmann, M., Korbmacher, D., Sauzet, O., Sudhoff, H., Ebmeyer, J.: Evaluation of tubomanometry as a routine diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction. Clinical Otolaryngology. 40, 691-697 (2015).
Schroeder, S., Lehmann, M., Korbmacher, D., Sauzet, Odile, Sudhoff, H., and Ebmeyer, J. “Evaluation of tubomanometry as a routine diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction”. Clinical Otolaryngology 40.6 (2015): 691-697.

17 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Treatment of Eustachian tube dysfunction with balloon dilation: A systematic review.
Huisman JML, Verdam FJ, Stegeman I, de Ru JA., Laryngoscope 128(1), 2018
PMID: 28799657
Patient satisfaction in the long-term effects of Eustachian tube balloon dilation is encouraging.
Luukkainen V, Vnencak M, Aarnisalo AA, Jero J, Sinkkonen ST., Acta Otolaryngol 138(2), 2018
PMID: 29017385
[Diagnosis and treatment of Eustachian tube dysfunction].
Schröder S, Ebmeyer J., HNO 66(2), 2018
PMID: 29313115
Analyzing eustachian tube function in patients with symptoms of chronical Eustachian tube dysfunction by pressure chamber measurements.
Meyer MF, Korthäuer C, Jansen S, Hüttenbrink KB, Beutner D., Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275(5), 2018
PMID: 29550920
Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty: Systematic Review of Long-term Outcomes and Proposed Indications.
Luukkainen V, Kivekäs I, Silvola J, Jero J, Sinkkonen ST., J Int Adv Otol 14(1), 2018
PMID: 29764785
Fluoroscopic subtraction Eustachian tubography: initial feasibility test in a cadaver model.
Kim KY, Kang WS, Park JH, Kang BC, Park JW, Kim MT, Bekheet NG, Hwang SJ, Choi J, Cho KJ, Park HJ, Song HY., Eur Radiol 28(9), 2018
PMID: 29619519
The Performance of Patient-reported Outcome Measures as Diagnostic Tools for Eustachian Tube Dysfunction.
Smith ME, Cochrane IL, Donnelly N, Axon PR, Tysome JR., Otol Neurotol 39(9), 2018
PMID: 30106847
Eustachian tube evaluation in aviators.
Iannella G, Lucertini M, Pasquariello B, Manno A, Angeletti D, Re M, Magliulo G., Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(1), 2017
PMID: 27435594
Diagnostic accuracy of tubomanometry R value in detecting the Eustachian tube pressure equalizing function.
Alper CM, Teixeira MS, Kim JH, Douglas Swarts J., Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(4), 2017
PMID: 28004262
Tuboimpedance: A New Test of Eustachian Tube Function.
Smith ME, Zou CC, Blythe AJ, Tysome JR., Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 156(4), 2017
PMID: 28116975
The repeatability of tests of eustachian tube function in healthy ears.
Smith ME, Zou CC, Baker C, Blythe AJC, Hutchinson PJA, Tysome JR., Laryngoscope 127(11), 2017
PMID: 28224679
Balloon Eustachian Tuboplasty in children.
Leichtle A, Hollfelder D, Wollenberg B, Bruchhage KL., Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(6), 2017
PMID: 28283791
Reliability of Eustachian tube function measurements in a hypobaric and hyperbaric pressure chamber.
Meyer MF, Jansen S, Mordkovich O, Hüttenbrink KB, Beutner D., Clin Otolaryngol 42(6), 2017
PMID: 28374944
Otologic evaluation of patients with primary antibody deficiency.
Magliulo G, Iannella G, Granata G, Ciofalo A, Pasquariello B, Angeletti D, La Marra F, Quinti I., Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(11), 2016
PMID: 26935054
Evidence and evidence gaps in the treatment of Eustachian tube dysfunction and otitis media.
Teschner M., GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 15(), 2016
PMID: 28025605

19 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Evolution of Eustachian tube surgery.
McCoul ED, Lucente FE, Anand VK., Laryngoscope 121(3), 2011
PMID: 21305559
Tympanoplasty in adults: a five-year survey.
Podoshin L, Fradis M, Malatskey S, Ben-David J., Ear Nose Throat J 75(3), 1996
PMID: 8721019
There are no accurate tests for eustachian tube function.
Todd NW., Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 126(8), 2000
PMID: 10922245
Laser eustachian tuboplasty: two-year results.
Poe DS, Grimmer JF, Metson R., Laryngoscope 117(2), 2007
PMID: 17277615
[Eustachian tube and middle ear mechanics].
Pau HW., HNO 59(10), 2011
PMID: 21909770
[Eustachian tube function tests: an update].
Di Martino EF., HNO 61(6), 2013
PMID: 23736942
Evaluation par tubomanométrie de la fonction d'ouverture tubaire et de la réponse tympanique chez le sujet normal et chez le sujet porteur d'une otite séro-muqueuse chronique: comparaison des résultats
Esteve, J Fr Orl 50(), 2001

Esteve, 2003
Assessment of chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction: Evaluation of the German version of the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire
Schröder, HNO 62(), 2014
[Clinical and experimental considerations for evaluation of Eustachian tube physiology].
Sudhoff H, Ockermann T, Mikolajczyk R, Ebmeyer J, Korbmacher D, Garten D, Schreiber S., HNO 57(5), 2009
PMID: 19390833

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Sonotubometry with perfect sequences: First results in pathological ears.
Asenov DR, Nath V, Telle A, Antweiler C, Walther LE, Vary P, Di Martino EF., Acta Otolaryngol. 130(11), 2010
PMID: 20632904
[Optotensometry for measuring the tube function - a feasibility study on a middle ear model].
Zehlicke T, Just T, Punke C, Stamer M, Muller J, Wendlandt R, Pau HW., Laryngorhinootologie 90(5), 2011
PMID: 21560089
New insights into mechanism of Eustachian tube ventilation based on cine computed tomography images.
McDonald MH, Hoffman MR, Gentry LR, Jiang JJ., Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(8), 2011
PMID: 22120826
A novel diagnostic tool for chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction—the eustachian tube score.
Schroder S, Lehmann M, Sauzet O, Ebmeyer J, Sudhoff H., Laryngoscope 125(3), 2014
PMID: 25215457

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 25925071
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar