Response actions influence the categorization of directions in auditory space

Velten MCC, Bläsing B, Hermann T, Vorwerg C, Schack T (2015)
Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1163.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Abstract / Bemerkung
Spatial region concepts such as “front,” “back,” “left,” and “right” reflect our typical interaction with space, and the corresponding surrounding regions have different statuses in memory. We examined the representation of spatial directions in the auditory space, specifically in how far natural response actions, such as orientation movements toward a sound source, would affect the categorization of egocentric auditory space. While standing in the middle of a circle with 16 loudspeakers, participants were presented acoustic stimuli coming from the loudspeakers in randomized order, and verbally described their directions by using the concept labels “front,” “back,” “left,” “right,” “front-right,” “front-left,” “back-right,” and “back-left.” Response actions varied in three blocked conditions: (1) facing front, (2) turning the head and upper body to face the stimulus, and (3) turning the head and upper body plus pointing with the hand and outstretched arm toward the stimulus. In addition to a protocol of the verbal utterances, motion capture and video recording generated a detailed corpus for subsequent analysis of the participants’ behavior. Chi-square tests revealed an effect of response condition for directions within the left and right sides. We conclude that movement-based response actions influence the representation of auditory space, especially within the sides’ regions. Moreover, the representation of auditory space favors the front and the back regions in terms of resolution, which is possibly related to the physiological characteristics of the human auditory system, as well as to the ecological requirements of action control in the different regions.
spatial directions; turning movements; spatial categorization; auditory space; response actions
Frontiers in Psychology
Open-Access-Publikationskosten wurden durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft und die Universität Bielefeld gefördert.
Page URI


Velten MCC, Bläsing B, Hermann T, Vorwerg C, Schack T. Response actions influence the categorization of directions in auditory space. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;6: 1163.
Velten, M. C. C., Bläsing, B., Hermann, T., Vorwerg, C., & Schack, T. (2015). Response actions influence the categorization of directions in auditory space. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1163. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01163
Velten, M. C. C., Bläsing, B., Hermann, T., Vorwerg, C., and Schack, T. (2015). Response actions influence the categorization of directions in auditory space. Frontiers in Psychology 6:1163.
Velten, M.C.C., et al., 2015. Response actions influence the categorization of directions in auditory space. Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 1163.
M.C.C. Velten, et al., “Response actions influence the categorization of directions in auditory space”, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 6, 2015, : 1163.
Velten, M.C.C., Bläsing, B., Hermann, T., Vorwerg, C., Schack, T.: Response actions influence the categorization of directions in auditory space. Frontiers in Psychology. 6, : 1163 (2015).
Velten, Marcella C. C., Bläsing, Bettina, Hermann, Thomas, Vorwerg, Constanze, and Schack, Thomas. “Response actions influence the categorization of directions in auditory space”. Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015): 1163.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Copyright Statement:
Dieses Objekt ist durch das Urheberrecht und/oder verwandte Schutzrechte geschützt. [...]
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
MD5 Prüfsumme

58 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Misperception of exocentric directions in auditory space.
Arthur JC, Philbeck JW, Sargent J, Dopkins S., Acta Psychol (Amst) 129(1), 2008
PMID: 18555205
A sensorimotor approach to sound localization.
Aytekin M, Moss CF, Simon JZ., Neural Comput 20(3), 2008
PMID: 18045018
Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.
Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y.., 1995
Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception.
Bhalla M, Proffitt DR, Kaiser MK., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25(4), 1999
PMID: 10464946

Blauert J.., 1997
From ear to hand: the role of the auditory-motor loop in pointing to an auditory source.
Boyer EO, Babayan BM, Bevilacqua F, Noisternig M, Warusfel O, Roby-Brami A, Hanneton S, Viaud-Delmon I., Front Comput Neurosci 7(), 2013
PMID: 23626532
Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes.
Bryant D., Tversky B., Franklin N.., 1992
Representing the egocentric auditory space: relationships of surrounding region concepts.
Campos MC, Hermann T, Schack T, Blasing B., Acta Psychol (Amst) 142(3), 2013
PMID: 23481544
The nature and distribution of errors in sound localization by human listeners.
Carlile S, Leong P, Hyams S., Hear. Res. 114(1-2), 1997
PMID: 9447931
Characters and their perspectives in narratives describing spatial environments.
de M.., 1994
Auditory peripersonal space in humans.
Farne A, Ladavas E., J Cogn Neurosci 14(7), 2002
PMID: 12419126
Parsing surrounding space into regions.
Franklin N, Henkel LA, Zangas T., Mem Cognit 23(4), 1995
PMID: 7666754
Searching imagined environments.
Franklin N., Tversky B.., 1990
Perception through action.
Gallese V., Craighero L., Fadiga L., Fogassi L.., 1999
Mental representations, psychology of
Gallistel C.., 2001
Grounding spatial language in the motor system: reciprocal interactions between spatial semantics and orienting.
Gibson B., Davis G.., 2011
Geography and the disabled: a survey with special reference to vision impaired and blind populations.
Golledge R.., 1993
Comparison of nine methods of indicating the direction to objects: data from blind adults.
Haber L, Haber RN, Penningroth S, Novak K, Radgowski H., Perception 22(1), 1993
PMID: 8474833
Properties of spatial representations: data from sighted and blind subjects.
Haber RN, Haber LR, Levin CA, Hollyfield R., Percept Psychophys 54(1), 1993
PMID: 8351180
Toward an action-concept model of stimulus response compatibility
Hommel B.., 1997
Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding).
Hommel B., Psychol Res 73(4), 2009
PMID: 19337749
The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.
Hommel B, Musseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W., Behav Brain Sci 24(5), 2001
PMID: 12239891
Understanding spatial concepts at the geographic scale without the use of vision.
Kitchin R., Blades M., Golledge R.., 1997
Sound localization with eccentric head position.
Lewald J, Dorrscheidt GJ, Ehrenstein WH., Behav. Brain Res. 108(2), 2000
PMID: 10701655
The effect of eye position on auditory lateralization.
Lewald J, Ehrenstein WH., Exp Brain Res 108(3), 1996
PMID: 8801127
Two-dimensional sound localization by human listeners.
Makous JC, Middlebrooks JC., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87(5), 1990
PMID: 2348023
Human spatial cognition
Mark D.., 1993

McDonald J.., 2009
Performing hand actions assists the visual discrimination of similar hand postures.
Miall RC, Stanley J, Todhunter S, Levick C, Lindo S, Miall JD., Neuropsychologia 44(6), 2005
PMID: 16249009
Sound localization by human listeners.
Middlebrooks JC, Green DM., Annu Rev Psychol 42(), 1991
PMID: 2018391
On the minimum audible angle.
Mills A.., 1958
Blindness to response-compatible stimuli.
Müsseler J., Hommel B.., 1997
Large manual pointing errors, but accurate verbal reports, for indications of target azimuth.
Philbeck J, Sargent J, Arthur J, Dopkins S., Perception 37(4), 2008
PMID: 18546661

Prinz W.., 1990
Perception and action planning.
Prinz W.., 1997
Action can affect auditory perception.
Repp BH, Knoblich G., Psychol Sci 18(1), 2007
PMID: 17362369

Rookes P., Willson J.., 2006

Schnupp J., Nelken I., King A.., 2011

Tomasello M.., 2010
Structures of mental spaces: how people think about space.
Tversky B.., 2003
Spatial hemineglect in back space.
Vallar G, Guariglia C, Nico D, Bisiach E., Brain 118 ( Pt 2)(), 1995
PMID: 7735887
Hemineglect: take a look at the back space.
Viaud-Delmon I, Brugger P, Landis T., Ann. Neurol. 62(4), 2007
PMID: 17702039

Vorwerg C.., 2001
Consistency in successive spatial utterances
Vorwerg C.., 2009
The role of head movements and vestibular and visual cues in sound localization.
Wallach H.., 1940
Observing and engaging in purposeful actions with objects influences estimates of their size.
Wesp R, Cichello P, Gracia EB, Davis K., Percept Psychophys 66(8), 2004
PMID: 15813192

Winston P.., 1984
Action’s effect on perception.
Witt J.., 2011
See the ball, hit the ball.
Witt JK, Proffitt DR., Psychol Sci 16(12), 2005
PMID: 16313656
Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it.
Witt JK, Proffitt DR, Epstein W., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31(5), 2005
PMID: 16262485
On interference effects in concurrent perception and action.
Zwickel J, Grosjean M, Prinz W., Psychol Res 74(2), 2009
PMID: 19214564


Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®


PMID: 26300837
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar