Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study
Ernst SA, Reeske A, Spallek J, Petersen K, Brand T, Zeeb H (2014)
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14(1): 371.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Ernst, Sinja Alexandra;
Reeske, AnnaUniBi;
Spallek, JacobUniBi;
Petersen, Knud;
Brand, Tilman;
Zeeb, Hajo
Einrichtung
Abstract / Bemerkung
Background: Antenatal care is of core importance for maternal and child health and is therefore a central aspect of mother and child health care. One of the main goals of effective screening in antenatal care is the detection of suboptimal fetal growth. However, the sensitivity of antenatal diagnostic of suboptimal fetal growth (i.e. intrauterine growth restriction; IUGR) through clinical routine fetal ultrasonography has been observed to be low. A study conducted in Germany found that only 30% of IUGR cases and 40% of congenital malformations were diagnosed antenatally. Reasons for this low detection rate remain unclear. Methods/Design: In the first of two study components, all mothers who delivered or will deliver a small for gestational age (SGA) newborn in one of three hospitals in Bremen (Germany) during recruitment phase are eligible for inclusion in a hospital based case-control study. Cases are defined as neonates with an IUGR that was not detected antenatally, while controls are defined as neonates whose IUGR was identified or at least suspected antenatally. Data collection instruments include a newborn documentation sheet, a standardized, computer-assisted personal interview with mothers, and a copy of pregnancy record books. The second component is a survey among all private practice-based gynecologists in the federal states of Bremen and Lower Saxony. The aim of this survey was to obtain detailed information e. g. on quality of ultrasonography equipment and examiner's ultrasonography experience and qualification level. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is one of the few German studies explicitly addressing care-related as well as maternal-related factors influencing the (non-) detection of IUGR by conducting comprehensive interviews with mothers and private practice-based gynecologists. Over the last 15 years there have been substantial technological advances in ultrasonography equipment in gynecological practices; hence there is the need to evaluate whether the detection rates of IUGR in Germany are still as low as previously reported in the late 1990ies. Our study results will contribute to a better understanding of core risk factors for low early detection rates of intrauterine growth restrictions and may support quality development in this important health care sector.
Stichworte
Prenatal ultrasonography;
Prenatal care;
Intrauterine growth restriction;
Case-control study
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
Zeitschriftentitel
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Band
14
Ausgabe
1
Art.-Nr.
371
ISSN
1471-2393
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2710637
Zitieren
Ernst SA, Reeske A, Spallek J, Petersen K, Brand T, Zeeb H. Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14(1): 371.
Ernst, S. A., Reeske, A., Spallek, J., Petersen, K., Brand, T., & Zeeb, H. (2014). Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14(1), 371. doi:10.1186/s12884-014-0371-5
Ernst, Sinja Alexandra, Reeske, Anna, Spallek, Jacob, Petersen, Knud, Brand, Tilman, and Zeeb, Hajo. 2014. “Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study”. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14 (1): 371.
Ernst, S. A., Reeske, A., Spallek, J., Petersen, K., Brand, T., and Zeeb, H. (2014). Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14:371.
Ernst, S.A., et al., 2014. Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14(1): 371.
S.A. Ernst, et al., “Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study”, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 14, 2014, : 371.
Ernst, S.A., Reeske, A., Spallek, J., Petersen, K., Brand, T., Zeeb, H.: Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 14, : 371 (2014).
Ernst, Sinja Alexandra, Reeske, Anna, Spallek, Jacob, Petersen, Knud, Brand, Tilman, and Zeeb, Hajo. “Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study”. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14.1 (2014): 371.
Daten bereitgestellt von European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)
2 Zitationen in Europe PMC
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial.
Ernst SA, Brand T, Lhachimi SK, Zeeb H., Health Serv Res 53(2), 2018
PMID: 28217941
Ernst SA, Brand T, Lhachimi SK, Zeeb H., Health Serv Res 53(2), 2018
PMID: 28217941
Care-Related and Maternal Risk Factors Associated with the Antenatal Nondetection of Intrauterine Growth Restriction: A Case-Control Study from Bremen, Germany.
Ernst SA, Brand T, Reeske A, Spallek J, Petersen K, Zeeb H., Biomed Res Int 2017(), 2017
PMID: 28473976
Ernst SA, Brand T, Reeske A, Spallek J, Petersen K, Zeeb H., Biomed Res Int 2017(), 2017
PMID: 28473976
43 References
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
Perinatal mortality and fetal growth restriction.
M Kady S, Gardosi J., Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18(3), 2004
PMID: 15183135
M Kady S, Gardosi J., Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18(3), 2004
PMID: 15183135
Intrauterine growth restriction: new concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis, and management.
Figueras F, Gardosi J., Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 204(4), 2011
PMID: 21215383
Figueras F, Gardosi J., Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 204(4), 2011
PMID: 21215383
Intrauterine restriction (IUGR).
Mandruzzato G, Antsaklis A, Botet F, Chervenak FA, Figueras F, Grunebaum A, Puerto B, Skupski D, Stanojevic M; WAPM., J Perinat Med 36(4), 2008
PMID: 18598115
Mandruzzato G, Antsaklis A, Botet F, Chervenak FA, Figueras F, Grunebaum A, Puerto B, Skupski D, Stanojevic M; WAPM., J Perinat Med 36(4), 2008
PMID: 18598115
Cerebral palsy and restricted growth status at birth: population-based case-control study.
Jacobsson B, Ahlin K, Francis A, Hagberg G, Hagberg H, Gardosi J., BJOG 115(10), 2008
PMID: 18715410
Jacobsson B, Ahlin K, Francis A, Hagberg G, Hagberg H, Gardosi J., BJOG 115(10), 2008
PMID: 18715410
Impact of intrauterine growth restriction on long-term health.
Salam RA, Das JK, Bhutta ZA., Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 17(3), 2014
PMID: 24613859
Salam RA, Das JK, Bhutta ZA., Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 17(3), 2014
PMID: 24613859
Intrauterine wachstumsrestriktion. Teil I: klassifikation, pathogenese und diagnose
Crombach G., 2007
Crombach G., 2007
Intrauterine growth restriction: definition and etiology.
Wollmann HA., Horm. Res. 49 Suppl 2(), 1998
PMID: 9730664
Wollmann HA., Horm. Res. 49 Suppl 2(), 1998
PMID: 9730664
Diagnostik und fetale Überwachung bei intrauteriner Wachstumsrestriction
Gembruch U, Baschat AA, Harman CR., 2001
Gembruch U, Baschat AA, Harman CR., 2001
General Principles and Applications of Ultrasonography
Manning FA., 2004
Manning FA., 2004
Current growth standards, definitions, diagnosis and classification of fetal growth retardation.
Bakketeig LS., Eur J Clin Nutr 52 Suppl 1(), 1998
PMID: 9511013
Bakketeig LS., Eur J Clin Nutr 52 Suppl 1(), 1998
PMID: 9511013
Are babies of normal birth weight who fail to reach their growth potential as diagnosed by ultrasound at increased risk?
Stratton JF, Scanaill SN, Stuart B, Turner MJ., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5(2), 1995
PMID: 7719861
Stratton JF, Scanaill SN, Stuart B, Turner MJ., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5(2), 1995
PMID: 7719861
Intrauterine growth restriction--diagnosis and management.
Sheridan C., Aust Fam Physician 34(9), 2005
PMID: 16184202
Sheridan C., Aust Fam Physician 34(9), 2005
PMID: 16184202
Therapieoption bei Wachstumsrestriktion des Fetus (IUGR)
Vetter K., 2001
Vetter K., 2001
Detection of small for gestational age fetuses by the combination of clinical risk factors and ultrasonography.
Rosendahl H, Kivinen S., Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 39(1), 1991
PMID: 2029959
Rosendahl H, Kivinen S., Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 39(1), 1991
PMID: 2029959
Screening for small for dates fetuses: a controlled trial.
Neilson JP, Munjanja SP, Whitfield CR., Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 289(6453), 1984
PMID: 6437476
Neilson JP, Munjanja SP, Whitfield CR., Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 289(6453), 1984
PMID: 6437476
Routine screening for intrauterine growth retardation in Germany: low sensitivity and questionable benefit for diagnosed cases.
Jahn A, Razum O, Berle P., Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77(6), 1998
PMID: 9688242
Jahn A, Razum O, Berle P., Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77(6), 1998
PMID: 9688242
Effectiveness of detection of intrauterine growth retardation by abdominal palpation as screening test in a low risk population: an observational study.
Bais JM, Eskes M, Pel M, Bonsel GJ, Bleker OP., Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 116(2), 2004
PMID: 15358457
Bais JM, Eskes M, Pel M, Bonsel GJ, Bleker OP., Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 116(2), 2004
PMID: 15358457
Routine-Ultraschall in der deutschen Schwangerenvorsorge: Ist die Effektivität gesichert
Jahn A, Razum O, Berle P., 1999
Jahn A, Razum O, Berle P., 1999
Suspicious findings in antenatal care and their implications from the mothers' perspective: a prospective study in Germany.
Petersen J, Jahn A., Birth 35(1), 2008
PMID: 18307487
Petersen J, Jahn A., Birth 35(1), 2008
PMID: 18307487
Prenatal diagnosis of major malformations: quality control of routine ultrasound examinations based on a five-year study of 20,248 newborn fetuses and infants.
Queisser-Luft A, Stopfkuchen H, Stolz G, Schlaefer K, Merz E., Prenat. Diagn. 18(6), 1998
PMID: 9664601
Queisser-Luft A, Stopfkuchen H, Stolz G, Schlaefer K, Merz E., Prenat. Diagn. 18(6), 1998
PMID: 9664601
[Efficacy of ultrasound screening in pregnancy]
Behrens O, Steiner C, Bohmer S, Muhlhaus K., Zentralbl Gynakol 121(5), 1999
PMID: 10408074
Behrens O, Steiner C, Bohmer S, Muhlhaus K., Zentralbl Gynakol 121(5), 1999
PMID: 10408074
Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy
Whitworth M, Bricker L, Neilson JP, Dowswell T., 2010
Whitworth M, Bricker L, Neilson JP, Dowswell T., 2010
Accuracy of fetal echocardiography in the routine detection of congenital heart disease among unselected and low risk populations: a systematic review.
Randall P, Brealey S, Hahn S, Khan KS, Parsons JM., BJOG 112(1), 2005
PMID: 15663393
Randall P, Brealey S, Hahn S, Khan KS, Parsons JM., BJOG 112(1), 2005
PMID: 15663393
Rosery H, Maxio-Bergemann S, Rosery B, Bergemann R., 2004
[Sensitive and specific screening for detection of spina bifida by echography in the second trimester; systematic review and meta-analysis]
Vos JM, Offringa M, Bilardo CM, Lijmer JG, Barth PG., Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 144(36), 2000
PMID: 10992900
Vos JM, Offringa M, Bilardo CM, Lijmer JG, Barth PG., Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 144(36), 2000
PMID: 10992900
Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound: the Belgian Multicentric Study.
Levi S, Hyjazi Y, Schaapst JP, Defoort P, Coulon R, Buekens P., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1(2), 1991
PMID: 12797083
Levi S, Hyjazi Y, Schaapst JP, Defoort P, Coulon R, Buekens P., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1(2), 1991
PMID: 12797083
The examiner's ultrasound experience has a significant impact on the detection rate of congenital heart defects at the second-trimester fetal examination.
Tegnander E, Eik-Nes SH., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28(1), 2006
PMID: 16736449
Tegnander E, Eik-Nes SH., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28(1), 2006
PMID: 16736449
Early screening for fetal cardiac anomalies by transvaginal echocardiography in an unselected population: the role of operator experience.
Rustico MA, Benettoni A, D'Ottavio G, Fischer-Tamaro L, Conoscenti GC, Meir Y, Natale R, Bussani R, Mandruzzato GP., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16(7), 2000
PMID: 11169366
Rustico MA, Benettoni A, D'Ottavio G, Fischer-Tamaro L, Conoscenti GC, Meir Y, Natale R, Bussani R, Mandruzzato GP., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16(7), 2000
PMID: 11169366
The influence of the experience of the investigator on the rate of sonographic diagnosis of fetal malformations in Vienna.
Bernaschek G, Stuempflen I, Deutinger J., Prenat. Diagn. 16(9), 1996
PMID: 8905894
Bernaschek G, Stuempflen I, Deutinger J., Prenat. Diagn. 16(9), 1996
PMID: 8905894
Screening for foetal malformations: performance of routine ultrasonography in the population of the Swiss Canton of Vaud.
Vial Y, Tran C, Addor MC, Hohlfeld P., Swiss Med Wkly 131(33-34), 2001
PMID: 11683078
Vial Y, Tran C, Addor MC, Hohlfeld P., Swiss Med Wkly 131(33-34), 2001
PMID: 11683078
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2008
Stillbirth differences according to regions of origin: an analysis of the German perinatal database, 2004-2007.
Reeske A, Kutschmann M, Razum O, Spallek J., BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 11(), 2011
PMID: 21936931
Reeske A, Kutschmann M, Razum O, Spallek J., BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 11(), 2011
PMID: 21936931
[Social differences in the utilisation of prenatal screening, smoking during pregnancy and birth weight--empirical analysis of data from the Perinatal Study in Bavaria (Germany)].
Koller D, Lack N, Mielck A., Gesundheitswesen 71(1), 2009
PMID: 19173144
Koller D, Lack N, Mielck A., Gesundheitswesen 71(1), 2009
PMID: 19173144
Perinatal outcome in Berlin (Germany) among immigrants from Turkey.
David M, Pachaly J, Vetter K., Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 274(5), 2006
PMID: 16847635
David M, Pachaly J, Vetter K., Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 274(5), 2006
PMID: 16847635
Inanspruchnahme der Schwangerschaftsvorsorge – ein Spiegel gesellschaftlicher Entwicklungen und Aspekte der Effizienz. Untersuchung auf Basis der Perinatalerhebung Baden-Württemberg 1998–2001
Simoes E, Kunz S, Bosing-Schwenkglenks M, Schwoerer P, Schmahl FW., 2003
Simoes E, Kunz S, Bosing-Schwenkglenks M, Schwoerer P, Schmahl FW., 2003
Prevention among immigrants: the example of Germany.
Spallek J, Zeeb H, Razum O., BMC Public Health 10(), 2010
PMID: 20181232
Spallek J, Zeeb H, Razum O., BMC Public Health 10(), 2010
PMID: 20181232
How well do doctors document their findings in antenatal care – and are their differences between women of German and non-German nationality?
Tadesse R, Jahn A, Razum O., 1999
Tadesse R, Jahn A, Razum O., 1999
Analyse des Geburtengutes des Jahrgangs 1992 der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Teil I: Neue Perzentilwerte für die Körpermaße von Neugeborenen
Voigt M, Schneider KTM, Jährig K., 1996
Voigt M, Schneider KTM, Jährig K., 1996
Prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction.
Bamberg C, Kalache KD., Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 9(5), 2004
PMID: 15691774
Bamberg C, Kalache KD., Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 9(5), 2004
PMID: 15691774
Ultrasound assessment of intrauterine growth restriction: relationship to neonatal body composition.
Law TL, Korte JE, Katikaneni LD, Wagner CL, Ebeling MD, Newman RB., Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 205(3), 2011
PMID: 22071054
Law TL, Korte JE, Katikaneni LD, Wagner CL, Ebeling MD, Newman RB., Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 205(3), 2011
PMID: 22071054
Report of the IDECG Working Group on effects of IUGR on infants, children and adolescents: immunocompetence, mortality, morbidity, body size, body composition, and physical performance.
Ferro-Luzzi A, Ashworth A, Martorell R, Scrimshaw N., Eur J Clin Nutr 52 Suppl 1(), 1998
PMID: 9511026
Ferro-Luzzi A, Ashworth A, Martorell R, Scrimshaw N., Eur J Clin Nutr 52 Suppl 1(), 1998
PMID: 9511026
The customised growth potential: an international research tool to study the epidemiology of fetal growth.
Gardosi J, Figueras F, Clausson B, Francis A., Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 25(1), 2010
PMID: 21133964
Gardosi J, Figueras F, Clausson B, Francis A., Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 25(1), 2010
PMID: 21133964
Intrauterine growth restriction: new standards for assessing adverse outcome.
Gardosi J., Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23(6), 2009
PMID: 19854681
Gardosi J., Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23(6), 2009
PMID: 19854681
Export
Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen
Web of Science
Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®Quellen
PMID: 25363152
PubMed | Europe PMC
Suchen in