Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study

Ernst SA, Reeske A, Spallek J, Petersen K, Brand T, Zeeb H (2014)
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14(1): 371.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Ernst, Sinja Alexandra; Reeske, AnnaUniBi; Spallek, JacobUniBi; Petersen, Knud; Brand, Tilman; Zeeb, Hajo
Abstract / Bemerkung
Background: Antenatal care is of core importance for maternal and child health and is therefore a central aspect of mother and child health care. One of the main goals of effective screening in antenatal care is the detection of suboptimal fetal growth. However, the sensitivity of antenatal diagnostic of suboptimal fetal growth (i.e. intrauterine growth restriction; IUGR) through clinical routine fetal ultrasonography has been observed to be low. A study conducted in Germany found that only 30% of IUGR cases and 40% of congenital malformations were diagnosed antenatally. Reasons for this low detection rate remain unclear. Methods/Design: In the first of two study components, all mothers who delivered or will deliver a small for gestational age (SGA) newborn in one of three hospitals in Bremen (Germany) during recruitment phase are eligible for inclusion in a hospital based case-control study. Cases are defined as neonates with an IUGR that was not detected antenatally, while controls are defined as neonates whose IUGR was identified or at least suspected antenatally. Data collection instruments include a newborn documentation sheet, a standardized, computer-assisted personal interview with mothers, and a copy of pregnancy record books. The second component is a survey among all private practice-based gynecologists in the federal states of Bremen and Lower Saxony. The aim of this survey was to obtain detailed information e. g. on quality of ultrasonography equipment and examiner's ultrasonography experience and qualification level. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is one of the few German studies explicitly addressing care-related as well as maternal-related factors influencing the (non-) detection of IUGR by conducting comprehensive interviews with mothers and private practice-based gynecologists. Over the last 15 years there have been substantial technological advances in ultrasonography equipment in gynecological practices; hence there is the need to evaluate whether the detection rates of IUGR in Germany are still as low as previously reported in the late 1990ies. Our study results will contribute to a better understanding of core risk factors for low early detection rates of intrauterine growth restrictions and may support quality development in this important health care sector.
Stichworte
Prenatal ultrasonography; Prenatal care; Intrauterine growth restriction; Case-control study
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
Zeitschriftentitel
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Band
14
Ausgabe
1
Art.-Nr.
371
ISSN
1471-2393
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2710637

Zitieren

Ernst SA, Reeske A, Spallek J, Petersen K, Brand T, Zeeb H. Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14(1): 371.
Ernst, S. A., Reeske, A., Spallek, J., Petersen, K., Brand, T., & Zeeb, H. (2014). Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14(1), 371. doi:10.1186/s12884-014-0371-5
Ernst, Sinja Alexandra, Reeske, Anna, Spallek, Jacob, Petersen, Knud, Brand, Tilman, and Zeeb, Hajo. 2014. “Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study”. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14 (1): 371.
Ernst, S. A., Reeske, A., Spallek, J., Petersen, K., Brand, T., and Zeeb, H. (2014). Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14:371.
Ernst, S.A., et al., 2014. Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 14(1): 371.
S.A. Ernst, et al., “Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study”, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 14, 2014, : 371.
Ernst, S.A., Reeske, A., Spallek, J., Petersen, K., Brand, T., Zeeb, H.: Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 14, : 371 (2014).
Ernst, Sinja Alexandra, Reeske, Anna, Spallek, Jacob, Petersen, Knud, Brand, Tilman, and Zeeb, Hajo. “Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study”. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14.1 (2014): 371.

2 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

43 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Perinatal mortality and fetal growth restriction.
M Kady S, Gardosi J., Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18(3), 2004
PMID: 15183135
Intrauterine restriction (IUGR).
Mandruzzato G, Antsaklis A, Botet F, Chervenak FA, Figueras F, Grunebaum A, Puerto B, Skupski D, Stanojevic M; WAPM., J Perinat Med 36(4), 2008
PMID: 18598115
Cerebral palsy and restricted growth status at birth: population-based case-control study.
Jacobsson B, Ahlin K, Francis A, Hagberg G, Hagberg H, Gardosi J., BJOG 115(10), 2008
PMID: 18715410
Impact of intrauterine growth restriction on long-term health.
Salam RA, Das JK, Bhutta ZA., Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 17(3), 2014
PMID: 24613859
Intrauterine wachstumsrestriktion. Teil I: klassifikation, pathogenese und diagnose
Crombach G., 2007
Intrauterine growth restriction: definition and etiology.
Wollmann HA., Horm. Res. 49 Suppl 2(), 1998
PMID: 9730664
Diagnostik und fetale Überwachung bei intrauteriner Wachstumsrestriction
Gembruch U, Baschat AA, Harman CR., 2001
General Principles and Applications of Ultrasonography
Manning FA., 2004
Are babies of normal birth weight who fail to reach their growth potential as diagnosed by ultrasound at increased risk?
Stratton JF, Scanaill SN, Stuart B, Turner MJ., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 5(2), 1995
PMID: 7719861
Intrauterine growth restriction--diagnosis and management.
Sheridan C., Aust Fam Physician 34(9), 2005
PMID: 16184202
Therapieoption bei Wachstumsrestriktion des Fetus (IUGR)
Vetter K., 2001
Detection of small for gestational age fetuses by the combination of clinical risk factors and ultrasonography.
Rosendahl H, Kivinen S., Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 39(1), 1991
PMID: 2029959
Screening for small for dates fetuses: a controlled trial.
Neilson JP, Munjanja SP, Whitfield CR., Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 289(6453), 1984
PMID: 6437476
Effectiveness of detection of intrauterine growth retardation by abdominal palpation as screening test in a low risk population: an observational study.
Bais JM, Eskes M, Pel M, Bonsel GJ, Bleker OP., Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 116(2), 2004
PMID: 15358457
Routine-Ultraschall in der deutschen Schwangerenvorsorge: Ist die Effektivität gesichert
Jahn A, Razum O, Berle P., 1999
[Efficacy of ultrasound screening in pregnancy]
Behrens O, Steiner C, Bohmer S, Muhlhaus K., Zentralbl Gynakol 121(5), 1999
PMID: 10408074
Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy
Whitworth M, Bricker L, Neilson JP, Dowswell T., 2010

Rosery H, Maxio-Bergemann S, Rosery B, Bergemann R., 2004
[Sensitive and specific screening for detection of spina bifida by echography in the second trimester; systematic review and meta-analysis]
Vos JM, Offringa M, Bilardo CM, Lijmer JG, Barth PG., Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 144(36), 2000
PMID: 10992900
Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound: the Belgian Multicentric Study.
Levi S, Hyjazi Y, Schaapst JP, Defoort P, Coulon R, Buekens P., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1(2), 1991
PMID: 12797083
Early screening for fetal cardiac anomalies by transvaginal echocardiography in an unselected population: the role of operator experience.
Rustico MA, Benettoni A, D'Ottavio G, Fischer-Tamaro L, Conoscenti GC, Meir Y, Natale R, Bussani R, Mandruzzato GP., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16(7), 2000
PMID: 11169366

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2008
Stillbirth differences according to regions of origin: an analysis of the German perinatal database, 2004-2007.
Reeske A, Kutschmann M, Razum O, Spallek J., BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 11(), 2011
PMID: 21936931
Perinatal outcome in Berlin (Germany) among immigrants from Turkey.
David M, Pachaly J, Vetter K., Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 274(5), 2006
PMID: 16847635
Inanspruchnahme der Schwangerschaftsvorsorge – ein Spiegel gesellschaftlicher Entwicklungen und Aspekte der Effizienz. Untersuchung auf Basis der Perinatalerhebung Baden-Württemberg 1998–2001
Simoes E, Kunz S, Bosing-Schwenkglenks M, Schwoerer P, Schmahl FW., 2003
Prevention among immigrants: the example of Germany.
Spallek J, Zeeb H, Razum O., BMC Public Health 10(), 2010
PMID: 20181232
How well do doctors document their findings in antenatal care – and are their differences between women of German and non-German nationality?
Tadesse R, Jahn A, Razum O., 1999
Analyse des Geburtengutes des Jahrgangs 1992 der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Teil I: Neue Perzentilwerte für die Körpermaße von Neugeborenen
Voigt M, Schneider KTM, Jährig K., 1996
Prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction.
Bamberg C, Kalache KD., Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 9(5), 2004
PMID: 15691774
Ultrasound assessment of intrauterine growth restriction: relationship to neonatal body composition.
Law TL, Korte JE, Katikaneni LD, Wagner CL, Ebeling MD, Newman RB., Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 205(3), 2011
PMID: 22071054
The customised growth potential: an international research tool to study the epidemiology of fetal growth.
Gardosi J, Figueras F, Clausson B, Francis A., Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 25(1), 2010
PMID: 21133964
Intrauterine growth restriction: new standards for assessing adverse outcome.
Gardosi J., Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23(6), 2009
PMID: 19854681
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 25363152
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar