Face the consequences: Learning about victim's suffering reduces sexual harassment myth acceptance and men's likelihood to sexually harass

Diehl C, Glaser T, Bohner G (2014)
Aggressive Behavior 40(6): 489-503.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Abstract / Bemerkung
Prior research has shown that (1) better knowledge about the consequences of rape goes along with less rape-supportive attitudes and lower rape proclivity, and (2) empathy with the victims correlates negatively with sexual aggression. In two experiments, the authors combined these approaches in order to reduce sexual harassment myth acceptance (SHMA) and the likelihood to sexually harass (LSH). In Study 1, 101 male and female university students read a report describing sexual harassment as either serious or harmless, and completed scales assessing dispositional empathy and SHMA. Results showed that higher empathy was associated with lower SHMA; furthermore, learning about the seriousness (vs. harmlessness) of sexual harassment led to lower SHMA, particularly in participants low in empathy. Gender differences in SHMA were fully explained by gender differences in empathy. In Study 2, perspective taking, a crucial aspect of empathy, was manipulated. One hundred nineteen male and female participants read either a neutral text or a description of a sexual harassment case, which was written either from the female target's or from the male perpetrator's perspective; then they completed scales measuring SHMA and (only male participants) LSH. The target's perspective led to lower SHMA and to lower LSH than did the neutral text, whereas no such effect was found for the perpetrator's perspective. Implications for intervention programs are discussed. Aggr. Behav. 40:489-503, 2014. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Stichworte
proclivity; sexual harassment; sexual harassment; sexual harassment myth acceptance; perspective taking; empathy
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
Zeitschriftentitel
Aggressive Behavior
Band
40
Ausgabe
6
Seite(n)
489-503
ISSN
0096-140X
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2707677

Zitieren

Diehl C, Glaser T, Bohner G. Face the consequences: Learning about victim's suffering reduces sexual harassment myth acceptance and men's likelihood to sexually harass. Aggressive Behavior. 2014;40(6):489-503.
Diehl, C., Glaser, T., & Bohner, G. (2014). Face the consequences: Learning about victim's suffering reduces sexual harassment myth acceptance and men's likelihood to sexually harass. Aggressive Behavior, 40(6), 489-503. doi:10.1002/ab.21553
Diehl, C., Glaser, T., and Bohner, G. (2014). Face the consequences: Learning about victim's suffering reduces sexual harassment myth acceptance and men's likelihood to sexually harass. Aggressive Behavior 40, 489-503.
Diehl, C., Glaser, T., & Bohner, G., 2014. Face the consequences: Learning about victim's suffering reduces sexual harassment myth acceptance and men's likelihood to sexually harass. Aggressive Behavior, 40(6), p 489-503.
C. Diehl, T. Glaser, and G. Bohner, “Face the consequences: Learning about victim's suffering reduces sexual harassment myth acceptance and men's likelihood to sexually harass”, Aggressive Behavior, vol. 40, 2014, pp. 489-503.
Diehl, C., Glaser, T., Bohner, G.: Face the consequences: Learning about victim's suffering reduces sexual harassment myth acceptance and men's likelihood to sexually harass. Aggressive Behavior. 40, 489-503 (2014).
Diehl, Charlotte, Glaser, Tina, and Bohner, Gerd. “Face the consequences: Learning about victim's suffering reduces sexual harassment myth acceptance and men's likelihood to sexually harass”. Aggressive Behavior 40.6 (2014): 489-503.

96 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Workplace victimization: aggression from the target's perspective.
Aquino K, Thau S., Annu Rev Psychol 60(), 2009
PMID: 19035831
Structural modeling of generalized prejudice: The role of social dominance, authoritarianism, and empathy
Bäckström, Journal of Individual Differences 28(), 2007
Sexual harassment on the internet
Barak, Social Science Computer Review 23(), 2005
Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group
Batson, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(), 2002
Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel
Batson, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(), 1997
Similarity and nurturance: Two possible sources of empathy for strangers
Batson, Basic and Applied Social Psychology 27(), 2005
Empathy and attitudes: can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group?
Batson CD, Polycarpou MP, Harmon-Jones E, Imhoff HJ, Mitchener EC, Bednar LL, Klein TR, Highberger L., J Pers Soc Psychol 72(1), 1997
PMID: 9008376
Assessment and prevention of sexual harassment of employees: An applied guide to creating healthy organizations
Bell, International Journal of Selection and Assessment 10(), 2002
The sexual harassment of men? Exploring the concept with theory and data
Berdahl, Psychology of Women Quarterly 20(), 1996
Workplace harassment: double jeopardy for minority women.
Berdahl JL, Moore C., J Appl Psychol 91(2), 2006
PMID: 16551193

Bohner, 1998

Bohner, 2009
The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men
Bohner, European Journal of Social Psychology 35(), 2005
Expecting to meet a rape victim affects women's self-esteem: The moderating role of rape myth acceptance
Bohner, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 7(), 2004
Using social norms to reduce men's rape proclivity: Perceived rape myth acceptance of out-groups may be more influential than that of in-groups
Bohner, Psychology, Crime & Law 16(), 2010
Rape myths as neutralizing cognitions: Evidence for a causal impact of anti-victim attitudes on men's self-reported likelihood of raping
Bohner, European Journal of Social Psychology 28(), 1998
Salience of rape affects self-esteem: Individual versus collective self-aspects
Bohner, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2(), 1999
Salience of rape affects self-esteem: The moderating role of gender and rape myth acceptance
Bohner, European Journal of Social Psychology 23(), 1993
Cultural myths and supports for rape.
Burt MR., J Pers Soc Psychol 38(2), 1980
PMID: 7373511
Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying
Caravita, Social Development 18(), 2009
Examining the job-related, psychological and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review
Chan, Psychology of Women Quarterly 32(), 2008

Cohen, 1988

Cohen, 2003
Incivility in the workplace: incidence and impact.
Cortina LM, Magley VJ, Williams JH, Langhout RD., J Occup Health Psychol 6(1), 2001
PMID: 11199258
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach
Davis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44(), 1983

Decety, 2005
Personal and organizational predictors of workplace sexual harassment of women by men.
Dekker I, Barling J., J Occup Health Psychol 3(1), 1998
PMID: 9552268
Perspective and prejudice: antecedents and mediating mechanisms.
Dovidio JF, ten Vergert M, Stewart TL, Gaertner SL, Johnson JD, Esses VM, Riek BM, Pearson AR., Pers Soc Psychol Bull 30(12), 2004
PMID: 15536238
Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men.
Einarsen S, Raknes BI., Violence Vict 12(3), 1997
PMID: 9477540
Gender-related traits and helping in a nonemergency situation
Eisenberger, Sex Roles 19(), 1988

European, 1998
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A., Behav Res Methods 39(2), 2007
PMID: 17695343
Improving intergroup relations: The effects of empathy on racial attitudes
Finlay, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30(), 2000
Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: a test of an integrated model.
Fitzgerald LF, Drasgow F, Hulin CL, Gelfand MJ, Magley VJ., J Appl Psychol 82(4), 1997
PMID: 9378685

Fitzgerald, 1997
Reducing rape-myth acceptance in male college students: A meta analysis of intervention studies
Flores, Journal of College Student Development 39(), 1998
Does empathy predict adolescents' bullying and defending behavior?
Gini G, Albiero P, Benelli B, Altoe G., Aggress Behav 33(5), 2007
PMID: 17683107
Structural equation models of sexual harassment: longitudinal explorations and cross-sectional generalizations.
Glomb TM, Munson LJ, Hulin CL, Bergman ME, Drasgow F., J Appl Psychol 84(1), 1999
PMID: 10089815
Rape knowledge and propensity to rape
Hamilton, Journal of Research in Personality 24(), 1990
Public perceptions of sexual harassment: An empirical analysis in Israel from consensus and feminist theoretical perspectives
Herzog, Sex Roles 57(), 2007

Hildebran, 1989

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Reported incidence rates of work-related sexual harassment in the United States: Using meta-analysis to explain reported rate desparities
Ilies, Personnel Psychology 56(), 2003
Schema-driven information processing in judgments about rape
Krahé, Applied Cognitive Psychology 21(), 2007
Prospective lawyers' rape stereotypes and schematic decision making about rape cases
Krahe, Psychology, Crime and Law 14(), 2008
Sexual overperception: power, mating motives, and biases in social judgment.
Kunstman JW, Maner JK., J Pers Soc Psychol 100(2), 2011
PMID: 21142379
Sexual versus nonsexual workplace aggression and victims' overall job satisfaction: a meta-analysis.
Lapierre LM, Spector PE, Leck JD., J Occup Health Psychol 10(2), 2005
PMID: 15826225
Hegemonic masculinity and male feminisation: The sexual harassment of men at work
Lee, Journal of Gender Studies 9(), 2000
Rape prevention: Experiential training for men
Lee, Journal of Counseling and Development 66(), 1987

Leeser, 1997
E-Skala: Fragebogen zur Erfassung von Empathie-Beschreibung und psychometrische Eigenschaften [E-Scale: Questionnaire for the Assessment of Empathy-description and psychometric properties]
Leibetseder, Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 22(), 2001
Sexual harassment mythology: Definition, conceptualization, and measurement
Lonsway, Sex Roles 58(), 2008
The impact of sexual harassment on military personnel: Is it the same for men and women
Magley, Military Psychology 11(), 1999
Functional projection: how fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception.
Maner JK, Kenrick DT, Becker DV, Robertson TE, Hofer B, Neuberg SL, Delton AW, Butner J, Schaller M., J Pers Soc Psychol 88(1), 2005
PMID: 15631575
Attitudes and perceptions of workers to sexual harassment.
McCabe MP, Hardman L., J Soc Psychol 145(6), 2005
PMID: 16334516
Workplace sexual harassment 30 years on: A review of the literature
McDonald, International Journal of Management Reviews 14(), 2012
Authoritarianism, social dominance, and other roots of generalized prejudice
McFarland, Political Psychology 31(), 2010
The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior.
Miller PA, Eisenberg N., Psychol Bull 103(3), 1988
PMID: 3289071
She dresses to attract, he perceives seduction: A gender gap in attribution of intent to women's revealing style of dress and its relation to blaming the victims of sexual violence
Moor, Journal of International Women's Studies 11(4), 2010
Longitudinal analysis of dispositional influence and sexual harassment: Effects on job and psychological outcomes
Munson, Personnel Psychology 53(), 2000
Organizational responses for preventing and stopping sexual harassment: Effective deterrents or continued endurance
Nelson, Sex Roles 56(), 2007
Rape prevention with college males: The roles of rape myth acceptance, victim empathy, and outcome expectancies
O'Donohue, Journal of Interpersonal Violence 18(), 2003
Rape myth acceptance: Exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale
Payne, Journal of Research in Personality 33(), 1999
The misperception of sexual interest.
Perilloux C, Easton JA, Buss DM., Psychol Sci 23(2), 2012
PMID: 22261567
How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators
Pettigrew, European Journal of Social Psychology 38(), 2008
Sexual harassment proclivities in men
Pryor, Sex Roles 17(), 1987
A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.
Rotundo M, Nguyen DH, Sackett PR., J Appl Psychol 86(5), 2001
PMID: 11596807
The significance of gender for third parties' perceptions of negative interpersonal behaviour: Labelling and explaining negative acts
Salin, Gender, Work & Organization 18(), 2011

Shoop, 1994
The sexual harassment of men: Evidence for a broader theory of sexual harassment and sex discrimination
Stockdale, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 5(), 1999

Strub, 2008
Schematic influences of rape myth acceptance on visual information processing: An eye-tracking approach
Süssenbach, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48(), 2012
The role of empathy in improving intergroup relations
Stephan, Journal of Social Issues 55(), 1999
Acceptance of male rape myths among college men and women
Struckman-Johnson, Sex Roles 27(), 1992
Die NSB-Skala: Vorstellung eines Instruments zur Erfassung der Neigung zu sexueller Belästigung [The NSB scale: Presentation and validation of a German-language instrument assessing sexual harassment proclivity]
Vanselow, Diagnostica 56(), 2010
Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions
Vescio, European Journal of Social Psychology 33(), 2003
A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment
Willness, Personnel Psychology 60(), 2007

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 25079949
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar