Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches
Reinhold K, Schielzeth H (2015)
Journal of Comparative Physiology A 201(1): 171-182.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Einrichtung
Abstract / Bemerkung
Animals are faced with many choices and a very important one is the choice of a mating partner. Inter-individual differences in mating preferences have been studied for some time, but most studies focus on the location of the peak preference rather than on other aspects of preference functions. In this review, we discuss the role of variation in choosiness in inter-sexual selection. We define individual-level choosiness as the change in mating propensity in response to different stimulus signals. We illustrate general issues in estimating aspects of preference functions and discuss experimental setups for quantifying variation in choosiness with a focus on choices based on acoustic signals in insects. One important consideration is whether preferences are measured sequentially one stimulus at a time or in competitive multiple-choice setups; the suitability of these alternatives depends on the ecology of the study species. Furthermore, we discuss the usefulness of behavioural proxies for determining preference functions, which can be misleading if the proxies are not linearly related to mating propensity. Finally, we address statistical approaches, including the use of function-valued trait analysis, for studying choosiness. Most of the conclusions can be generalized beyond acoustic signals in insects and to choices in non-sexual contexts.
Stichworte
Experimental design;
Animal personality;
Sexual selection;
Mating preferences;
Mate choice
Erscheinungsjahr
2015
Zeitschriftentitel
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
Band
201
Ausgabe
1
Seite(n)
171-182
ISSN
0340-7594
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2705975
Zitieren
Reinhold K, Schielzeth H. Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 2015;201(1):171-182.
Reinhold, K., & Schielzeth, H. (2015). Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 201(1), 171-182. doi:10.1007/s00359-014-0963-6
Reinhold, Klaus, and Schielzeth, Holger. 2015. “Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches”. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 201 (1): 171-182.
Reinhold, K., and Schielzeth, H. (2015). Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 201, 171-182.
Reinhold, K., & Schielzeth, H., 2015. Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 201(1), p 171-182.
K. Reinhold and H. Schielzeth, “Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches”, Journal of Comparative Physiology A, vol. 201, 2015, pp. 171-182.
Reinhold, K., Schielzeth, H.: Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 201, 171-182 (2015).
Reinhold, Klaus, and Schielzeth, Holger. “Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches”. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 201.1 (2015): 171-182.
Daten bereitgestellt von European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)
7 Zitationen in Europe PMC
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
Direct detection of male quality can facilitate the evolution of female choosiness and indicators of good genes: Evolution across a continuum of indicator mechanisms.
Dhole S, Stern CA, Servedio MR., Evolution 72(4), 2018
PMID: 29528491
Dhole S, Stern CA, Servedio MR., Evolution 72(4), 2018
PMID: 29528491
No male mate choice for female boldness in a bi-parental West African cichlid, the rainbow krib (Pelvicachromis pulcher).
Scherer U, Schuett W., PeerJ 6(), 2018
PMID: 30123707
Scherer U, Schuett W., PeerJ 6(), 2018
PMID: 30123707
In Space and Time: Territorial Animals are Attracted to Conspecific Chemical Cues.
Campos SM, Strauss C, Martins EP., Ethology 123(2), 2017
PMID: 28413237
Campos SM, Strauss C, Martins EP., Ethology 123(2), 2017
PMID: 28413237
Describing mate preference functions and other function-valued traits.
Kilmer JT, Fowler-Finn KD, Gray DA, Höbel G, Rebar D, Reichert MS, Rodríguez RL., J Evol Biol 30(9), 2017
PMID: 28556474
Kilmer JT, Fowler-Finn KD, Gray DA, Höbel G, Rebar D, Reichert MS, Rodríguez RL., J Evol Biol 30(9), 2017
PMID: 28556474
Risk of predation makes foragers less choosy about their food.
Charalabidis A, Dechaume-Moncharmont FX, Petit S, Bohan DA., PLoS One 12(11), 2017
PMID: 29121652
Charalabidis A, Dechaume-Moncharmont FX, Petit S, Bohan DA., PLoS One 12(11), 2017
PMID: 29121652
Inheritance Pattern of Female Receptivity in Drosophila prolongata.
Hitoshi Y, Ishikawa Y, Matsuo T., Zoolog Sci 33(5), 2016
PMID: 27715421
Hitoshi Y, Ishikawa Y, Matsuo T., Zoolog Sci 33(5), 2016
PMID: 27715421
Modality interactions alter the shape of acoustic mate preference functions in gray treefrogs.
Reichert MS, Höbel G., Evolution 69(9), 2015
PMID: 26282702
Reichert MS, Höbel G., Evolution 69(9), 2015
PMID: 26282702
77 References
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
S, Behav Ecol 21(), 2010
M, 1994
SJ, 1983
NW, Behav Ecol 19(), 2008
NW, Behav Ecol 19(), 2008
Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice.
Bateson M, Healy SD., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 20(12), 2005
PMID: 16701454
Bateson M, Healy SD., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 20(12), 2005
PMID: 16701454
OM, Proc R Soc B 275(), 2008
R, Biol Rev 76(), 2001
I, Anim Behav 81(), 2011
M, Anim Behav 86(), 2013
Female guppies agree to differ: phenotypic and genetic variation in mate-choice behavior and the consequences for sexual selection.
Brooks R, Endler JA., Evolution 55(8), 2001
PMID: 11580024
Brooks R, Endler JA., Evolution 55(8), 2001
PMID: 11580024
Experimental evidence for multivariate stabilizing sexual selection.
Brooks R, Hunt J, Blows MW, Smith MJ, Bussiere LF, Jennions MD., Evolution 59(4), 2005
PMID: 15926696
Brooks R, Hunt J, Blows MW, Smith MJ, Bussiere LF, Jennions MD., Evolution 59(4), 2005
PMID: 15926696
Female choice for an indicator of male size in the song of the black-horned tree cricket, Oecanthus nigricornis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Oecanthinae).
Brown WD, Wideman J, Andrade MCB, Mason AC, Gwynne DT., Evolution 50(6), 1996
PMID: IND20567279
Brown WD, Wideman J, Andrade MCB, Mason AC, Gwynne DT., Evolution 50(6), 1996
PMID: IND20567279
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
IR, Meth Ecol Evol (), 2014
C, 1859
LR, Behav Ecol (), 2014
T, Anim Behav 45(), 1993
JA, Evolution 49(), 1995
TW, Proc R Soc Lond B 270(), 2003
Maternal effects influence the sexual behavior of sons and daughters in the zebra finch.
Forstmeier W, Coltman DW, Birkhead TR., Evolution 58(11), 2004
PMID: 15612299
Forstmeier W, Coltman DW, Birkhead TR., Evolution 58(11), 2004
PMID: 15612299
KD, Anim Behav 85(), 2013
A, 2007
HC, 2002
DA, J Insect Behav 12(), 1999
Quantitative genetics of sexual selection in the field cricket, Gryllus integer.
Gray DA, Cade WH., Evolution 53(3), 1999
PMID: IND22020903
Gray DA, Cade WH., Evolution 53(3), 1999
PMID: IND22020903
Experimental evidence that sexual conflict influences the opportunity, form and intensity of sexual selection.
Hall MD, Bussiere LF, Hunt J, Brooks R., Evolution 62(9), 2008
PMID: 18540949
Hall MD, Bussiere LF, Hunt J, Brooks R., Evolution 62(9), 2008
PMID: 18540949
TR, 1983
AV, Biol J Linn Soc 105(), 2012
A, Behav Ecol 9(), 1998
Variation in continuous reaction norms: quantifying directions of biological interest.
Izem R, Kingsolver JG., Am. Nat. 166(2), 2005
PMID: 16032579
Izem R, Kingsolver JG., Am. Nat. 166(2), 2005
PMID: 16032579
AS, Anim Behav 81(), 2011
Absolute versus relative measurements of sexual selection: assessing the contributions of ultrasonic signal characters to mate attraction in lesser wax moths, Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).
Jang YIndianaUniversity, Greenfield MD., Evolution 52(5), 1998
PMID: IND21983062
Jang YIndianaUniversity, Greenfield MD., Evolution 52(5), 1998
PMID: IND21983062
YW, Heredity 84(), 2000
MD, Biol Rev 72(), 1997
MM, Behav Ecol 18(), 2007
Male courtship song and female preference variation between phylogeographically distinct populations of Drosophila montana.
Klappert K, Mazzi D, Hoikkala A, Ritchie MG., Evolution 61(6), 2007
PMID: 17542854
Klappert K, Mazzi D, Hoikkala A, Ritchie MG., Evolution 61(6), 2007
PMID: 17542854
Competitive speciation and costs of choosiness.
Kopp M, Hermisson J., J. Evol. Biol. 21(4), 2008
PMID: 18513357
Kopp M, Hermisson J., J. Evol. Biol. 21(4), 2008
PMID: 18513357
Matched filters, mate choice and the evolution of sexually selected traits.
Kostarakos K, Hartbauer M, Romer H., PLoS ONE 3(8), 2008
PMID: 18714350
Kostarakos K, Hartbauer M, Romer H., PLoS ONE 3(8), 2008
PMID: 18714350
A, Ethology 119(), 2013
S, Ethology 118(), 2012
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Testing for direct and indirect effects of mate choice by manipulating female choosiness.
Maklakov AA, Arnqvist G., Curr. Biol. 19(22), 2009
PMID: 19853448
Maklakov AA, Arnqvist G., Curr. Biol. 19(22), 2009
PMID: 19853448
S, Bioscience 62(), 2012
KP, Proc R Soc B 280(), 2013
AE, Biol J Linn Soc 83(), 2004
KM, J Insect Behav 20(), 2007
JN, Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65(), 2011
NL, Genes Genom Genet 4(), 2014
D, Biol Rev 82(), 2007
D, Behav Ecol 22(), 2011
K, Ethology 115(), 2009
Variation in acoustic signalling traits exhibits footprints of sexual selection.
Reinhold K., Evolution 65(3), 2010
PMID: 20840596
Reinhold K., Evolution 65(3), 2010
PMID: 20840596
K, Anim Behav 64(), 2002
MG, Proc Natl Acad Sci 93(), 1996
Characterization of female preference functions for Drosophila montana courtship song and a test of the temperature coupling hypothesis.
Ritchie MG, Saarikettu M, Livingstone S, Hoikkala A., Evolution 55(4), 2001
PMID: 11392390
Ritchie MG, Saarikettu M, Livingstone S, Hoikkala A., Evolution 55(4), 2001
PMID: 11392390
MG, Anim Behav 70(), 2005
Genetic variance and phenotypic plasticity in a component of female mate choice in an ultrasonic moth.
Rodriguez RL, Greenfield MD., Evolution 57(6), 2003
PMID: 12894938
Rodriguez RL, Greenfield MD., Evolution 57(6), 2003
PMID: 12894938
RL, Proc R Soc B 273(), 2006
RL, Behav Ecol 23(), 2012
Diversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences.
Rodriguez RL, Boughman JW, Gray DA, Hebets EA, Hobel G, Symes LB., Ecol. Lett. 16(8), 2013
PMID: 23809185
Rodriguez RL, Boughman JW, Gray DA, Hebets EA, Hobel G, Symes LB., Ecol. Lett. 16(8), 2013
PMID: 23809185
Curves as traits: genetic and environmental variation in mate preference functions.
Rodriguez RL, Hallett AC, Kilmer JT, Fowler-Finn KD., J. Evol. Biol. 26(2), 2012
PMID: 23252651
Rodriguez RL, Hallett AC, Kilmer JT, Fowler-Finn KD., J. Evol. Biol. 26(2), 2012
PMID: 23252651
MM, J Comp Physiol A 198(), 2012
Heritability of and early environment effects on variation in mating preferences.
Schielzeth H, Bolund E, Forstmeier W., Evolution 64(4), 2009
PMID: 19895552
Schielzeth H, Bolund E, Forstmeier W., Evolution 64(4), 2009
PMID: 19895552
Toward an efficient and integrative analysis of limited-choice behavioral experiments.
Schilling K, Oberdick J, Schilling RL., J. Neurosci. 32(37), 2012
PMID: 22972990
Schilling K, Oberdick J, Schilling RL., J. Neurosci. 32(37), 2012
PMID: 22972990
MR, Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(), 2014
Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preference in Hawaiian crickets.
Shaw KL., Evolution 54(4), 2000
PMID: 11005297
Shaw KL., Evolution 54(4), 2000
PMID: 11005297
KL, Proc R Soc Lond B 267(), 2000
A, Phil Trans R Soc B 367(), 2012
Geographic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus.
Simmons LW, Zuk M, Rotenberry JT., Evolution 55(7), 2001
PMID: 11525462
Simmons LW, Zuk M, Rotenberry JT., Evolution 55(7), 2001
PMID: 11525462
R, Anim Behav 91(), 2014
L, J Comp Physiol A 194(), 2008
WE, Anim Behav 49(), 1995
Individual variation in parental care reaction norms: integration of personality and plasticity.
Westneat DF, Hatch MI, Wetzel DP, Ensminger AL., Am. Nat. 178(5), 2011
PMID: 22030734
Westneat DF, Hatch MI, Wetzel DP, Ensminger AL., Am. Nat. 178(5), 2011
PMID: 22030734
DF, Biol Rev (), 2014
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences.
Widemo F, Sæther SA., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 14(1), 1999
PMID: 10234244
Widemo F, Sæther SA., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 14(1), 1999
PMID: 10234244
Export
Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen
Web of Science
Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®Quellen
PMID: 25398575
PubMed | Europe PMC
Suchen in