A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol

Berens E-M, Reder M, Kolip P, Spallek J (2014)
BMJ Open 4(9): e006145.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
OA
Abstract / Bemerkung
Introduction: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women. In Germany, women are invited to a population-based mammography screening programme for the first time at the age of 50. Since it is still discussed whether the benefits of mammography screening outweigh its harms, the concept of informed choice has gained importance. The objective of this cross-sectional study is to assess the proportion of informed choices in the mammography screening programme. A special focus is on the examination of the impact of Turkish migration background and educational level on informed choices. Methods and analysis: The proportion of informed choices is evaluated in a cross-sectional study with 3-month follow-up for behavioural implementation of the screening intention. A randomly selected sample of 17 000 women aged 50 years living in Westphalia-Lippe, a region in the Federal State of North-Rhine Westphalia, is invited to participate in this study. To reach adequate numbers of Turkish women, all possibly Turkish women in the sample are identified through a name algorithm and contacted. The sample is drawn from women registered in the study area for which the registration offices consented to supply data for the study (88% of all towns/cities in the study region). Women identified through the Turkish name algorithm received all materials in German and Turkish. The primary outcome is informed choice. Data are collected on informed choice components (knowledge, attitude, decision/implementation) as well as on its possible determinants (eg, health behaviour, perceived behavioural control, subjective norms, invitation status, migration background and other demographic variables). Data are collected before the screening appointment and at 3 months follow-up. Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Medical Faculty of Muenster University. Results will be published in a relevant scientific journal and communicated to respondents and relevant institutions.
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
Zeitschriftentitel
BMJ Open
Band
4
Ausgabe
9
Seite(n)
e006145
ISSN
2044-6055
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Open-Access-Publikationskosten wurden durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft und die Universität Bielefeld gefördert.
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2695697

Zitieren

Berens E-M, Reder M, Kolip P, Spallek J. A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol. BMJ Open. 2014;4(9):e006145.
Berens, E. - M., Reder, M., Kolip, P., & Spallek, J. (2014). A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol. BMJ Open, 4(9), e006145. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006145
Berens, Eva-Maria, Reder, Maren, Kolip, Petra, and Spallek, Jacob. 2014. “A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol”. BMJ Open 4 (9): e006145.
Berens, E. - M., Reder, M., Kolip, P., and Spallek, J. (2014). A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol. BMJ Open 4, e006145.
Berens, E.-M., et al., 2014. A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol. BMJ Open, 4(9), p e006145.
E.-M. Berens, et al., “A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol”, BMJ Open, vol. 4, 2014, pp. e006145.
Berens, E.-M., Reder, M., Kolip, P., Spallek, J.: A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol. BMJ Open. 4, e006145 (2014).
Berens, Eva-Maria, Reder, Maren, Kolip, Petra, and Spallek, Jacob. “A cross-sectional study on informed choice in the mammography screening programme in Germany (InEMa): a study protocol”. BMJ Open 4.9 (2014): e006145.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Copyright Statement:
Dieses Objekt ist durch das Urheberrecht und/oder verwandte Schutzrechte geschützt. [...]
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2019-09-06T09:18:26Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
6275ea0f6e7f18fc1fb644a5d1f67b36


7 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Comparing adaptive and fixed bandwidth-based kernel density estimates in spatial cancer epidemiology.
Lemke D, Mattauch V, Heidinger O, Pebesma E, Hense HW., Int J Health Geogr 14(), 2015
PMID: 25889018

27 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.


von L, Anttila A, Ronco G., 2008

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2013

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2009

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2012

Perry N, Broeders M, de C., 2006
A measure of informed choice.
Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S., Health Expect 4(2), 2001
PMID: 11359540
Sociodemographic predictors of non-attendance at invitational mammography screening--a population-based register study (Sweden).
Lagerlund M, Maxwell AE, Bastani R, Thurfjell E, Ekbom A, Lambe M., Cancer Causes Control 13(1), 2002
PMID: 11899121
Does a national screening programme reduce socioeconomic inequalities in mammography use?
Puddu M, Demarest S, Tafforeau J., Int J Public Health 54(2), 2009
PMID: 19247577
Profile of women not attending in the Swiss Mammography Screening Pilot Programme.
Bulliard JL, de Landtsheer JP, Levi F., Breast 13(4), 2004
PMID: 15325662
Social predictors of non-attendance in an urban mammographic screening programme: a multilevel analysis.
Zackrisson S, Lindstrom M, Moghaddassi M, Andersson I, Janzon L., Scand J Public Health 35(5), 2007
PMID: 17852976
Estimating attendance for breast cancer screening in ethnic groups in London.
Renshaw C, Jack RH, Dixon S, Moller H, Davies EA., BMC Public Health 10(), 2010
PMID: 20334699
Participation in mammography screening among migrants and non-migrants in Denmark.
Kristiansen M, Thorsted BL, Krasnik A, von Euler-Chelpin M., Acta Oncol 51(1), 2011
PMID: 22035117
Results of breast cancer screening in first generation migrants in Northwest Netherlands.
Visser O, van Peppen AM, Ory FG, van Leeuwen FE., Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 14(3), 2005
PMID: 15901994
The attendance of migrant women at the national breast cancer screening in the Netherlands 1997-2008.
Vermeer B, Van den Muijsenbergh ME., Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 19(3), 2010
PMID: 20150815
Participation in breast cancer screening among women of Turkish origin in Germany - a register-based study.
Berens EM, Stahl L, Yilmaz-Aslan Y, Sauzet O, Spallek J, Razum O., BMC Womens Health 14(), 2014
PMID: 24507093
Public knowledge of benefits of breast and prostate cancer screening in Europe.
Gigerenzer G, Mata J, Frank R., J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 101(17), 2009
PMID: 19671770
Mammografie-Screening und informierte Entscheidung—mehr Fragen als Antworten
Diercks ML, Schmacke N., 0
How useful is a name-based algorithm in health research among Turkish migrants in Germany?
Razum O, Zeeb H, Akgun S., Trop. Med. Int. Health 6(8), 2001
PMID: 11555431
[Name-based identification of cases of Turkish origin in the childhood cancer registry in Mainz]
Spallek J, Kaatsch P, Spix C, Ulusoy N, Zeeb H, Razum O., Gesundheitswesen 68(10), 2006
PMID: 17099826
Helping women make choices about mammography screening: an online randomized trial of a decision aid for 40-year-old women.
Mathieu E, Barratt AL, McGeechan K, Davey HM, Howard K, Houssami N., Patient Educ Couns 81(1), 2010
PMID: 20149953

Fishbein M, Ajzen I., 2010
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 25231495
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar