Habitual vs Non- Habitual Manual Actions: An ERP Study on Overt Movement Execution

Westerholz J, Schack T, Schütz C, Koester D (2014)
PLoS ONE 9(4): e93116.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
OA
Abstract / Bemerkung
This study explored the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the planning and execution of an overt goal- related handle rotation task. More specifically, we studied the neural basis of motor actions concerning the influence of the grasp choice. The aim of the present study was to differentiate cerebral activity between grips executed in a habitual and a nonhabitual mode, and between specified and free grip choices. To our knowledge, this is the first study to differentiate cerebral activity underlying overt goal-related actions executed with a focus on the habitual mode. In a handle rotation task, participants had to use thumb-toward (habitual) or thumb- away ( non- habitual) grips to rotate a handle to a given target position. Reaction and reach times were shorter for the habitual compared to the non- habitual mode indicating that the habitual mode requires less cognitive processing effort than the non- habitual mode. Neural processes for action execution ( measured by event-related potentials ( ERPs)) differed between habitual and non-habitual conditions. We found differential activity between habitual and non- habitual conditions in left and right frontal areas from -600 to 200 ms time- locked to reaching the target position. No differential neural activity could be traced for the specification of the grip. The results suggested that the frontal negativity reflected increased difficulty in movement precision control in the non- habitual mode compared to the habitual mode during the homing in phase of grasp and rotation actions.
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
Zeitschriftentitel
PLoS ONE
Band
9
Ausgabe
4
Art.-Nr.
e93116
ISSN
1932-6203
eISSN
1932-6203
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Open-Access-Publikationskosten wurden durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft und die Universität Bielefeld gefördert.
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2677406

Zitieren

Westerholz J, Schack T, Schütz C, Koester D. Habitual vs Non- Habitual Manual Actions: An ERP Study on Overt Movement Execution. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4): e93116.
Westerholz, J., Schack, T., Schütz, C., & Koester, D. (2014). Habitual vs Non- Habitual Manual Actions: An ERP Study on Overt Movement Execution. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e93116. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093116
Westerholz, Jan, Schack, Thomas, Schütz, Christoph, and Koester, Dirk. 2014. “Habitual vs Non- Habitual Manual Actions: An ERP Study on Overt Movement Execution”. PLoS ONE 9 (4): e93116.
Westerholz, J., Schack, T., Schütz, C., and Koester, D. (2014). Habitual vs Non- Habitual Manual Actions: An ERP Study on Overt Movement Execution. PLoS ONE 9:e93116.
Westerholz, J., et al., 2014. Habitual vs Non- Habitual Manual Actions: An ERP Study on Overt Movement Execution. PLoS ONE, 9(4): e93116.
J. Westerholz, et al., “Habitual vs Non- Habitual Manual Actions: An ERP Study on Overt Movement Execution”, PLoS ONE, vol. 9, 2014, : e93116.
Westerholz, J., Schack, T., Schütz, C., Koester, D.: Habitual vs Non- Habitual Manual Actions: An ERP Study on Overt Movement Execution. PLoS ONE. 9, : e93116 (2014).
Westerholz, Jan, Schack, Thomas, Schütz, Christoph, and Koester, Dirk. “Habitual vs Non- Habitual Manual Actions: An ERP Study on Overt Movement Execution”. PLoS ONE 9.4 (2014): e93116.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Copyright Statement:
Dieses Objekt ist durch das Urheberrecht und/oder verwandte Schutzrechte geschützt. [...]
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2019-09-06T09:18:23Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
2724d3fe75d25de3630d959ebc18577a


3 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Movement Interferes with Visuospatial Working Memory during the Encoding: An ERP Study.
Gunduz Can R, Schack T, Koester D., Front Psychol 8(), 2017
PMID: 28611714
Neurophysiology of Grasping Actions: Evidence from ERPs.
Koester D, Schack T, Westerholz J., Front Psychol 7(), 2016
PMID: 28066310

29 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.


AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1992
End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2006
Returning home: location memory versus posture memory in object manipulation.
Weigelt M, Cohen R, Rosenbaum DA., Exp Brain Res 179(2), 2006
PMID: 17119941
Cognition, action, and object manipulation.
Rosenbaum DA, Chapman KM, Weigelt M, Weiss DJ, van der Wel R., Psychol Bull 138(5), 2012
PMID: 22448912
Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling.
Herbort O, Butz MV., Exp Brain Res 213(4), 2011
PMID: 21748333

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
From cognition to biomechanics and back: The end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1996
Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1999
The influence of initial and final precision on motor planning: Individual differences in end-state comfort during unimanual grasping and placing
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2012
Optimal control in the critical phase of movement: A functional approach to motor planning processes
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2013
Time course of movement planning: Selection of handgrips for object manipulation
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1992
Action effect anticipation: Neurophysiological basis and functional consequences
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2012
Pouring or chilling a bottle of wine: an fMRI study on the prospective planning of object-directed actions.
van Elk M, Viswanathan S, van Schie HT, Bekkering H, Grafton ST., Exp Brain Res 218(2), 2012
PMID: 22349497
Event-related brain potentials for goal-related power grips.
Westerholz J, Schack T, Koester D., PLoS ONE 8(7), 2013
PMID: 23844211
Awareness affects motor planning for goal-oriented actions.
Bozzacchi C, Giusti MA, Pitzalis S, Spinelli D, Di Russo F., Biol Psychol 89(2), 2012
PMID: 22234365
Similar cerebral motor plans for real and virtual actions.
Bozzacchi C, Giusti MA, Pitzalis S, Spinelli D, Di Russo F., PLoS ONE 7(10), 2012
PMID: 23112847
Premotor and motor components of reaction time.
Botwinick J, Thompson LW., J Exp Psychol 71(1), 1966
PMID: 5902149
Goal-directed aiming: two components but multiple processes.
Elliott D, Hansen S, Grierson LE, Lyons J, Bennett SJ, Hayes SJ., Psychol Bull 136(6), 2010
PMID: 20822209
When the brain changes its mind: flexibility of action selection in instructed and free choices.
Fleming SM, Mars RB, Gladwin TE, Haggard P., Cereb. Cortex 19(10), 2009
PMID: 19211661
The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.
Oldfield RC., Neuropsychologia 9(1), 1971
PMID: 5146491
The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements.
Oostenveld R, Praamstra P., Clin Neurophysiol 112(4), 2001
PMID: 11275545
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.
Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E., Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55(4), 1983
PMID: 6187540
ERP effects of spatial attention and display search with unilateral and bilateral stimulus displays.
Lange JJ, Wijers AA, Mulder LJ, Mulder G., Biol Psychol 50(3), 1999
PMID: 10461806
Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1990
Conceptual knowledge for understanding other's actions is organized primarily around action goals.
van Elk M, van Schie HT, Bekkering H., Exp Brain Res 189(1), 2008
PMID: 18521584
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 24691654
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar