Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk

Ramm SA, Stockley P (2014)
Behavioral Ecology 25(3): 660-667.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Ramm, Steven A.UniBi ; Stockley, Paula
Abstract / Bemerkung
Male eagerness to mate is a central paradigm of sexual selection theory. However, limited sperm supplies mean that male sexual restraint might sometimes be favored under promiscuous mating. Here, we demonstrate dynamic plasticity in male mating effort when females are encountered sequentially under varying sperm competition risk. Rather than showing consistent eagerness to mate, male house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) instead tailor their mating effort according to likely reproductive payoffs. They are significantly less likely to mate when sperm competition is certain and potential reproductive payoffs low, but dramatically increase investment if they do choose to mate under such circumstances. By contrast, male mice are significantly more likely to mate in situations simulating extra-territorial copulations, where future risk of competition is high but so too are potential reproductive rewards. Differential mating propensity appears to be the primary mechanism by which male house mice allocate sperm adaptively under sperm competition risk because we find no evidence for facultative adjustment of sperm numbers per ejaculate or ejaculation frequency in response to female-related cues. We conclude that sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk could be a widespread but often unappreciated mechanism of strategic sperm allocation.
Behavioral Ecology
Page URI


Ramm SA, Stockley P. Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk. Behavioral Ecology. 2014;25(3):660-667.
Ramm, S. A., & Stockley, P. (2014). Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk. Behavioral Ecology, 25(3), 660-667. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru037
Ramm, Steven A., and Stockley, Paula. 2014. “Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk”. Behavioral Ecology 25 (3): 660-667.
Ramm, S. A., and Stockley, P. (2014). Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk. Behavioral Ecology 25, 660-667.
Ramm, S.A., & Stockley, P., 2014. Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk. Behavioral Ecology, 25(3), p 660-667.
S.A. Ramm and P. Stockley, “Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk”, Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25, 2014, pp. 660-667.
Ramm, S.A., Stockley, P.: Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk. Behavioral Ecology. 25, 660-667 (2014).
Ramm, Steven A., and Stockley, Paula. “Sequential male mate choice under sperm competition risk”. Behavioral Ecology 25.3 (2014): 660-667.

11 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Odor Communication and Mate Choice in Rodents.
Ferkin MH., Biology (Basel) 7(1), 2018
PMID: 29370074
Males prefer virgin females, even if parasitized, in the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare.
Fortin M, Debenest C, Souty-Grosset C, Richard FJ., Ecol Evol 8(6), 2018
PMID: 29607029
Sex roles and adult sex ratios: insights from mammalian biology and consequences for primate behaviour.
Kappeler PM., Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 372(1729), 2017
PMID: 28760762
Copulatory plugs inhibit the reproductive success of rival males.
Mangels R, Tsung K, Kwan K, Dean MD., J Evol Biol 29(11), 2016
PMID: 27488082
The molecular basis and reproductive function(s) of copulatory plugs.
Schneider MR, Mangels R, Dean MD., Mol Reprod Dev 83(9), 2016
PMID: 27518218
A trade-off between precopulatory and postcopulatory trait investment in male cetaceans.
Dines JP, Mesnick SL, Ralls K, May-Collado L, Agnarsson I, Dean MD., Evolution 69(6), 2015
PMID: 25929734
Genetic and phenotypic influences on copulatory plug survival in mice.
Mangels R, Young B, Keeble S, Ardekani R, Meslin C, Ferreira Z, Clark NL, Good JM, Dean MD., Heredity (Edinb) 115(6), 2015
PMID: 26103947
Sperm competition risk drives plasticity in seminal fluid composition.
Ramm SA, Edward DA, Claydon AJ, Hammond DE, Brownridge P, Hurst JL, Beynon RJ, Stockley P., BMC Biol 13(), 2015
PMID: 26507392

71 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Arnqvist G, Rowe L., 2005
Copulation duration in the soldier fly: the roles of cryptic male choice and sperm competition risk
Barbosa F., 2011
Male mate choice: why sequential choice can make its evolution difficult
Barry KL, Kokko H., 2010
Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila.
BATEMAN AJ., Heredity (Edinb) 2(Pt. 3), 1948
PMID: 18103134
Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution.
Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MH, White JS., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 24(3), 2009
PMID: 19185386
Reversed sexual conflict in a promiscuous antelope.
Bro-Jorgensen J., Curr. Biol. 17(24), 2007
PMID: 18060785
The reproductive ecology of the house mouse.
Bronson FH., Q Rev Biol 54(3), 1979
PMID: 390600
Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.
Byrne PG, Rice WR., Proc. Biol. Sci. 273(1589), 2006
PMID: 16627276
Duration of mating relates to fertility in mice.
deCatanzaro D., Physiol. Behav. 50(2), 1991
PMID: 1745685
Limited variation in the major urinary proteins of laboratory mice.
Cheetham SA, Smith AL, Armstrong SD, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL., Physiol. Behav. 96(2), 2008
PMID: 18973768

Darwin C., 1871
Patterns of copulatory behavior in male mammals.
Dewsbury DA., Q Rev Biol 47(1), 1972
PMID: 4553708
Effects of novelty on copulatory behavior: the Coolidge effect and related phenomena
Dewsbury DA., 1981
The Coolidge effect in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster)
Dewsbury DA., 1981
Ejaculate cost and male choice
Dewsbury DA., 1982
Paternal behavior in rodents
Dewsbury DA., 1985

Eberhard WG., 1996
The evolution and significance of male mate choice.
Edward DA, Chapman T., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 26(12), 2011
PMID: 21890230
Strategic male mating effort and cryptic male choice in a scorpionfly.
Engqvist L, Sauer KP., Proc. Biol. Sci. 268(1468), 2001
PMID: 11321062
Copulatory behavior and nest building behavior of wild house mice (Mus musculus).
Estep DQ, Lanier DL, Dewsbury DA., Anim Learn Behav 3(4), 1975
PMID: 1228022
Cryptic preference for MHC-dissimilar females in male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus.
Gillingham MA, Richardson DS, Lovlie H, Moynihan A, Worley K, Pizzari T., Proc. Biol. Sci. 276(1659), 2009
PMID: 19129124

Green EL., 1966
Comparative analysis of copulatory plugs in muroid rodents and their relationship to copulatory behavior
Hartung TG, Dewsbury DA., 1978
Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. I. Communication between males
Hurst JL., 1990
Recovery from sexual satiety in male rats
Jackson SB, Dewsbury DA., 1979
Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.
Jennions MD, Petrie M., Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 75(1), 2000
PMID: 10740892
Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies.
Kelley JL, Graves JA, Magurran AE., Nature 401(6754), 1999
PMID: 10537103
Size and function of mammalian testes in relation to body size
Kenagy GJ, Trombulak SC., 1986
Sexual selection in mice. IV. Experimental demonstration of selective fertilization
Levine L., 1967
Male mounting alone reduces female promiscuity in the fowl.
Lovlie H, Cornwallis CK, Pizzari T., Curr. Biol. 15(13), 2005
PMID: 16005296
Male Drosophilamelanogaster adjust ejaculate size based on female mating status, fecundity, and age
Lüpold S, Manier MK, Ala-Honkola O, Belote JM, Pitnick S., 2011
Mate quality and mating decisions
Parker GA., 1983
Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base
Parker GA., 1998
Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview.
Parker GA., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 361(1466), 2006
PMID: 16612884
Sperm competition and ejaculate economics.
Parker GA, Pizzari T., Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 85(4), 2010
PMID: 20560928
No effect of familiarity on the Coolidge effect in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
Pierce JD, O’Brien KK, Dewsbury DA., 1992
Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl.
Pizzari T, Cornwallis CK, Lovlie H, Jakobsson S, Birkhead TR., Nature 426(6962), 2003
PMID: 14603319
Sex-specific, counteracting responses to inbreeding in a bird.
Pizzari T, Lovlie H, Cornwallis CK., Proc. Biol. Sci. 271(1553), 2004
PMID: 15475330
Male mate choice influences female promiscuity in Soay sheep.
Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Pemberton JM, Coltman DW, Wilson K., Proc. Biol. Sci. 272(1561), 2005
PMID: 15734690
Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion.
Preston BT, Stevenson IR, Pemberton JM, Wilson K., Nature 409(6821), 2001
PMID: 11217847
R: a language and environment for statistical computing
Ejaculate allocation under varying sperm competition risk in the house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus
Ramm SA, Stockley P., 2007
Male house mice do not adjust sperm allocation in response to odours from related or unrelated rivals
Ramm SA, Stockley P., 2009
Adaptive plasticity of mammalian sperm production in response to social experience.
Ramm SA, Stockley P., Proc. Biol. Sci. 276(1657), 2009
PMID: 18986975
Scent marks as reliable signals of the competitive ability of mates.
Rich TJ, Hurst JL., Anim Behav 56(3), 1998
PMID: 9784223
Male mate choice, sexual conflict and strategic allocation of copulations in a lekking bird.
Saether SA, Fiske P, Kalas JA., Proc. Biol. Sci. 268(1481), 2001
PMID: 11600073
Male mate choice as predicted by sperm competition in thirteen-lined ground squirrels
Schwagmeyer PL, Parker GA., 1990
Sperm competition selects for male mate choice and protandry in the bushcricket, Requena verticalis (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)
Simmons LW, Llorens T, Schinzig M, Hosken D, Craig M., 1994
The effect of social organization on reproductive success and gene flow in colonies of wild house mice, Requena verticalis
Singleton GR, Hay DA., 1983
Strategic sperm allocation and a Coolidge effect in an externally fertilizing species
Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals.
Stockley P, Bro-Jorgensen J., Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 86(2), 2011
PMID: 20636474
Sperm competition and diversity in rodent copulatory behaviour.
Stockley P, Preston BT., J. Evol. Biol. 17(5), 2004
PMID: 15312077
Sex-specific responses to sexual familiarity, and the role of olfaction in Drosophila.
Tan CK, Lovlie H, Greenway E, Goodwin SF, Pizzari T, Wigby S., Proc. Biol. Sci. 280(1771), 2013
PMID: 24068355
Detection of female mating status using chemical signals and cues.
Thomas ML., Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 86(1), 2011
PMID: 20233168
Major histocompatibility complex heterozygosity enhances reproductive success.
Thoss M, Ilmonen P, Musolf K, Penn DJ., Mol. Ecol. 20(7), 2011
PMID: 21291500
Males distinguish between former female residents of their territories and unfamiliar, nonresident females as preferred mating partners in the lizard Anolis sagrei
Tokarz RR., 2008
Variation in male mate preference for female size in the swordtail Xiphophorus malinche
Tudor MS, Morris MR., 2009
Protandry and mate assessment in the wartbiter Decticus verrucivorus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae)
Wedell N., 1992
Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females
Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA., 2002
Modification in the sexual behavior of male rats produced by changing the stimulus female.
WILSON JR, KUEHN RE, BEACH FA., J Comp Physiol Psychol 56(), 1963
PMID: 14001051
Prudent male mate choice under perceived sperm competition risk in the eastern mosquito fish
Wong BBM, McCarthy M., 2009
Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility
Zeh JA, Zeh DW., 2003

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

PMID: 24822023
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar