Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study

Cacciari C, Bolognini N, Senna I, Pellicciari MC, Miniussi C, Papagno C (2011)
Brain and Language 119(3): 149-157.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
DOI
Autor*in
Cacciari, C.; Bolognini, N.; Senna, IreneUniBi; Pellicciari, M.C.; Miniussi, C.; Papagno, C.
Einrichtung
Center of Excellence - Cognitive Interaction Technology CITEC
Fakultät für Biologie > Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
Erscheinungsjahr
2011
Zeitschriftentitel
Brain and Language
Band
119
Ausgabe
3
Seite(n)
149-157
ISSN
0093-934X
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2651525

Zitieren

Cacciari C, Bolognini N, Senna I, Pellicciari MC, Miniussi C, Papagno C. Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language. 2011;119(3):149-157.
Cacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M. C., Miniussi, C., & Papagno, C. (2011). Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language, 119(3), 149-157. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.004
Cacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, Irene, Pellicciari, M.C., Miniussi, C., and Papagno, C. 2011. “Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study”. Brain and Language 119 (3): 149-157.
Cacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M. C., Miniussi, C., and Papagno, C. (2011). Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language 119, 149-157.
Cacciari, C., et al., 2011. Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language, 119(3), p 149-157.
C. Cacciari, et al., “Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study”, Brain and Language, vol. 119, 2011, pp. 149-157.
Cacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M.C., Miniussi, C., Papagno, C.: Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language. 119, 149-157 (2011).
Cacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, Irene, Pellicciari, M.C., Miniussi, C., and Papagno, C. “Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study”. Brain and Language 119.3 (2011): 149-157.

22 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Time-Course of Motor Involvement in Literal and Metaphoric Action Sentence Processing: A TMS Study.
Reilly M, Howerton O, Desai RH., Front Psychol 10(), 2019
PMID: 30863346
Idioms in the World: A Focus on Processing.
Kulkova ES, Fischer MH., Front Psychol 10(), 2019
PMID: 31178789
Metaphor Comprehension in Schizophrenic Patients.
Rossetti I, Brambilla P, Papagno C., Front Psychol 9(), 2018
PMID: 29867648
Embodied Simulations Are Modulated by Sentential Perspective.
van Dam WO, Desai RH., Cogn Sci 41(6), 2017
PMID: 27859508
Involvement of the Motor System in Comprehension of Non-Literal Action Language: A Meta-Analysis Study.
Yang J, Shu H., Brain Topogr 29(1), 2016
PMID: 25681159
Conventional metaphors in longer passages evoke affective brain response.
Citron FMM, Güsten J, Michaelis N, Goldberg AE., Neuroimage 139(), 2016
PMID: 27346546
Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction.
Jamrozik A, McQuire M, Cardillo ER, Chatterjee A., Psychon Bull Rev 23(4), 2016
PMID: 27294425
Brain dynamics in the comprehension of action-related language. A time-frequency analysis of mu rhythms.
Moreno I, de Vega M, León I, Bastiaansen M, Glen Lewis A, Magyari L., Neuroimage 109(), 2015
PMID: 25583610
Auditory and motion metaphors have different scalp distributions: an ERP study.
Schmidt-Snoek GL, Drew AR, Barile EC, Agauas SJ., Front Hum Neurosci 9(), 2015
PMID: 25821433
Does the road go up the mountain? Fictive motion between linguistic conventions and cognitive motivations.
Stosic D, Fagard B, Sarda L, Colin C., Cogn Process 16 Suppl 1(), 2015
PMID: 26239755
TEST: a tropic, embodied, and situated theory of cognition.
Myachykov A, Scheepers C, Fischer MH, Kessler K., Top Cogn Sci 6(3), 2014
PMID: 23616259
Action sentences activate sensory motor regions in the brain independently of their status of reality.
de Vega M, León I, Hernández JA, Valdés M, Padrón I, Ferstl EC., J Cogn Neurosci 26(7), 2014
PMID: 24392906
Sticking your neck out and burying the hatchet: what idioms reveal about embodied simulation.
Kacinik NA., Front Hum Neurosci 8(), 2014
PMID: 25309381
How the context matters. Literal and figurative meaning in the embodied language paradigm.
Cuccio V, Ambrosecchia M, Ferri F, Carapezza M, Lo Piparo F, Fogassi L, Gallese V., PLoS One 9(12), 2014
PMID: 25531530
Ambiguous idiom processing in Parkinson's disease patients.
Papagno C, Mattavelli G, Cattaneo Z, Romito L, Albanese A., Cogn Neuropsychol 30(7-8), 2013
PMID: 24479736
Where is the action? Action sentence processing in Parkinson's disease.
Fernandino L, Conant LL, Binder JR, Blindauer K, Hiner B, Spangler K, Desai RH., Neuropsychologia 51(8), 2013
PMID: 23624313
Motor activation in literal and non-literal sentences: does time matter?
Cacciari C, Pesciarelli F., Front Hum Neurosci 7(), 2013
PMID: 23730278
She runs, the road runs, my mind runs, bad blood runs between us: literal and figurative motion verbs: an fMRI study.
Romero Lauro LJ, Mattavelli G, Papagno C, Tettamanti M., Neuroimage 83(), 2013
PMID: 23792983
A piece of the action: modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors.
Desai RH, Conant LL, Binder JR, Park H, Seidenberg MS., Neuroimage 83(), 2013
PMID: 23891645
ERP evidence for conceptual mappings and comparison processes during the comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors.
Lai VT, Curran T., Brain Lang 127(3), 2013
PMID: 24182839
When do you grasp the idea? MEG evidence for instantaneous idiom understanding.
Boulenger V, Shtyrov Y, Pulvermüller F., Neuroimage 59(4), 2012
PMID: 22100772
Where in the brain is nonliteral language? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.
Rapp AM, Mutschler DE, Erb M., Neuroimage 63(1), 2012
PMID: 22759997
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 21684590
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar