Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals

Mayer KM, Di Luca M, Ernst MO (2014)
Acta Psychologica 147: 2-9.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Mayer, Katja M.; Di Luca, Massimiliano; Ernst, Marc O.UniBi
Abstract / Bemerkung
How humans perform duration judgments withmultisensory stimuli is an ongoing debate. Here, we investigated how sub-second duration judgments are achieved by asking participants to compare the duration of a continuous sound to the duration of an empty interval inwhich onset and offset were marked by signals of different modalities using all combinations of visual, auditory and tactile stimuli. The pattern of perceived durations across five stimulus durations (ranging from 100 ms to 900 ms) follows the Vierordt Law. Furthermore, intervals with a sound as onset (audio-visual, audio-tactile) are perceived longer than intervalswith a sound as offset. Nomodality ordering effect is found for visualtactile intervals. To infer whether a single modality-independent or multiple modality-dependent time-keeping mechanisms exist we tested whether perceived duration follows a summative or a multiplicative distortion pattern by fitting a model to all modality combinations and durations. The results confirm that perceived duration depends on sensory latency (summative distortion). Instead, we did not find evidence for multiplicative distortions. The results of the model and the behavioural data support the concept of a single time-keeping mechanism that allows for judgments of durations marked by multisensory stimuli.
Acta Psychologica
Page URI


Mayer KM, Di Luca M, Ernst MO. Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals. Acta Psychologica. 2014;147:2-9.
Mayer, K. M., Di Luca, M., & Ernst, M. O. (2014). Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals. Acta Psychologica, 147, 2-9. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.009
Mayer, Katja M., Di Luca, Massimiliano, and Ernst, Marc O. 2014. “Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals”. Acta Psychologica 147: 2-9.
Mayer, K. M., Di Luca, M., and Ernst, M. O. (2014). Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals. Acta Psychologica 147, 2-9.
Mayer, K.M., Di Luca, M., & Ernst, M.O., 2014. Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals. Acta Psychologica, 147, p 2-9.
K.M. Mayer, M. Di Luca, and M.O. Ernst, “Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals”, Acta Psychologica, vol. 147, 2014, pp. 2-9.
Mayer, K.M., Di Luca, M., Ernst, M.O.: Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals. Acta Psychologica. 147, 2-9 (2014).
Mayer, Katja M., Di Luca, Massimiliano, and Ernst, Marc O. “Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals”. Acta Psychologica 147 (2014): 2-9.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Copyright Statement:
Dieses Objekt ist durch das Urheberrecht und/oder verwandte Schutzrechte geschützt. [...]
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
MD5 Prüfsumme

7 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

A tRNS investigation of the sensory representation of time.
Mioni G, Grondin S, Mapelli D, Stablum F., Sci Rep 8(1), 2018
PMID: 29985432
A single mechanism account of duration and rate processing via the pacemaker-accumulator and beat frequency models.
Hartcher-O'Brien J, Brighouse C, Levitan CA., Curr Opin Behav Sci 8(), 2016
PMID: 27294175
Rate perception adapts across the senses: evidence for a unified timing mechanism.
Levitan CA, Ban YH, Stiles NR, Shimojo S., Sci Rep 5(), 2015
PMID: 25748443
Why studying intermodal duration discrimination matters.
Grondin S., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 25071626

27 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Psychophysical theories of duration discrimination
Allan, Perception & Psychophysics 16(1), 1974
The scalp topogrphy of human visual evoked potentials.
Allison T, Matsumiya Y, Goff GD, Goff WR., Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 42(2), 1977
PMID: 65254
Relativity theory and time perception: single or multiple clocks?
Buhusi CV, Meck WH., PLoS ONE 4(7), 2009
PMID: 19623247
Alternative representations of time, number, and rate
Church, Cognition 37(1–2), 1990
Recalibration of multisensory simultaneity: Cross-modal transfer coincides with a change in perceptual latency
Di, Journal of Vision 9(12:7), 2009
Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions
Grondin, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72(3), 2010
Markers' influence on the duration discrimination of intermodal intervals.
Grondin S, Ivry RB, Franz E, Perreault L, Metthe L., Percept Psychophys 58(3), 1996
PMID: 8935903
Judging the relative duration of multimodal short empty time intervals.
Grondin S, Rousseau R., Percept Psychophys 49(3), 1991
PMID: 2011462
Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception.
Ivry RB, Schlerf JE., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 12(7), 2008
PMID: 18539519
Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism.
Morein-Zamir S, Soto-Faraco S, Kingstone A., Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 17(1), 2003
PMID: 12763201
Time-shrinking: the process of unilateral temporal assimilation.
Nakajima Y, ten Hoopen G, Sasaki T, Yamamoto K, Kadota M, Simons M, Suetomi D., Perception 33(9), 2004
PMID: 15560508
A new illusion of time perception
Nakajima, Music Perception 8(), 1991
Visuotactile temporal order judgments in ageing.
Poliakoff E, Shore DI, Lowe C, Spence C., Neurosci. Lett. 396(3), 2005
PMID: 16356634
Duration discrimination of empty time intervals marked by intermodal pulses.
Rousseau R, Poirier J, Lemyre L., Percept Psychophys 34(6), 1983
PMID: 6664809
Time stretching: Illusory lengthening of filled auditory durations
Sasaki, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72(5), 2010
Time-shrinking, its propagation, and Gestalt principles.
Sasaki T, Suetomi D, Nakajima Y, ten Hoopen G., Percept Psychophys 64(6), 2002
PMID: 12269299
Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the ‘internal clock’
Treisman, Psychological Monographs 77(1–31), 1963
Crossmodal temporal discrimination: assessing the predictions of a general pacemaker-counter model.
Ulrich R, Nitschke J, Rammsayer T., Percept Psychophys 68(7), 2006
PMID: 17355038

von, 1868
Why “sounds are judged longer than lights”
Wearden, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. B 51(), 1998
The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.
Wichmann FA, Hill NJ., Percept Psychophys 63(8), 2001
PMID: 11800458
Audiotactile temporal order judgments.
Zampini M, Brown T, Shore DI, Maravita A, Roder B, Spence C., Acta Psychol (Amst) 118(3), 2004
PMID: 15698825
Audio-visual simultaneity judgments.
Zampini M, Guest S, Shore DI, Spence C., Percept Psychophys 67(3), 2005
PMID: 16119399

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

PMID: 23953664
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar