Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: Biogas and digestate

Astals S, Nolla Ardevol V, Mata-Alvarez J (2012)
Bioresource Technology 110: 63-70.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Astals, S.; Nolla Ardevol, VimacUniBi; Mata-Alvarez, J.
Abstract / Bemerkung
Crude glycerol derived from biodiesel production is characterized by its high concentration of organic carbon and its solubility in water; properties that make it a suitable co-substrate to improve the efficiency of a manure digester. An increase of about 400% in biogas production was obtained under mesophilic conditions when pig manure was co-digested with 4% of glycerol, on a wet-basis, compared to mono-digestion. The increase in biogas production was mainly a consequence of the increase in organic loading rate. However, the differences could also be related to the synergy between both substrates and the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio. Moreover, the analysis of the macro-compounds, protein, lipids, carbohydrates and fibers, showed lower removal efficiencies in the co-digester as the microorganisms obtained nutrients from the soluble carbohydrates provided by the glycerol. The digestate stability, evaluated through a respirometric assay, showed that co-substrate addition does not exert a negative impact on digestate quality. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Stichworte
Anaerobic digestion; Codigestion; Glycerine; Swine manure
Erscheinungsjahr
2012
Zeitschriftentitel
Bioresource Technology
Band
110
Seite(n)
63-70
ISSN
0960-8524
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2518071

Zitieren

Astals S, Nolla Ardevol V, Mata-Alvarez J. Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: Biogas and digestate. Bioresource Technology. 2012;110:63-70.
Astals, S., Nolla Ardevol, V., & Mata-Alvarez, J. (2012). Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: Biogas and digestate. Bioresource Technology, 110, 63-70. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.080
Astals, S., Nolla Ardevol, Vimac, and Mata-Alvarez, J. 2012. “Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: Biogas and digestate”. Bioresource Technology 110: 63-70.
Astals, S., Nolla Ardevol, V., and Mata-Alvarez, J. (2012). Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: Biogas and digestate. Bioresource Technology 110, 63-70.
Astals, S., Nolla Ardevol, V., & Mata-Alvarez, J., 2012. Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: Biogas and digestate. Bioresource Technology, 110, p 63-70.
S. Astals, V. Nolla Ardevol, and J. Mata-Alvarez, “Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: Biogas and digestate”, Bioresource Technology, vol. 110, 2012, pp. 63-70.
Astals, S., Nolla Ardevol, V., Mata-Alvarez, J.: Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: Biogas and digestate. Bioresource Technology. 110, 63-70 (2012).
Astals, S., Nolla Ardevol, Vimac, and Mata-Alvarez, J. “Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: Biogas and digestate”. Bioresource Technology 110 (2012): 63-70.

51 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Enhanced biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and horse manure with mechanical pre-treatment.
Lopes M, Baptista P, Duarte E, Moreira ALN., Environ Technol 40(10), 2019
PMID: 29267133
Metabolic survey of Botryococcus braunii: Impact of the physiological state on product formation.
Blifernez-Klassen O, Chaudhari S, Klassen V, Wördenweber R, Steffens T, Cholewa D, Niehaus K, Kalinowski J, Kruse O., PLoS One 13(6), 2018
PMID: 29879215
Optimization of the anaerobic co-digestion of pasteurized slaughterhouse waste, pig slurry and glycerine.
Rodríguez-Abalde Á, Flotats X, Fernández B., Waste Manag 61(), 2017
PMID: 28024897
A stability assessment tool for anaerobic codigestion.
Cook SM, Skerlos SJ, Raskin L, Love NG., Water Res 112(), 2017
PMID: 28122271
Value-adding conversion and volume reduction of sewage sludge by anaerobic co-digestion with crude glycerol.
Kurahashi K, Kimura C, Fujimoto Y, Tokumoto H., Bioresour Technol 232(), 2017
PMID: 28214698
Highly efficient methane generation from untreated microalgae biomass.
Klassen V, Blifernez-Klassen O, Wibberg D, Winkler A, Kalinowski J, Posten C, Kruse O., Biotechnol Biofuels 10(), 2017
PMID: 28725266
The effect of magnesium as activator and inhibitor of anaerobic digestion.
Romero-Güiza MS, Mata-Alvarez J, Chimenos JM, Astals S., Waste Manag 56(), 2016
PMID: 27402564
Efficiency and biotechnological aspects of biogas production from microalgal substrates.
Klassen V, Blifernez-Klassen O, Wobbe L, Schlüter A, Kruse O, Mussgnug JH., J Biotechnol 234(), 2016
PMID: 27449486
Microalgal cultivation with biogas slurry for biofuel production.
Zhu L, Yan C, Li Z., Bioresour Technol 220(), 2016
PMID: 27599623
Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and pig manure with different mixing ratios.
Tian H, Duan N, Lin C, Li X, Zhong M., J Biosci Bioeng 120(1), 2015
PMID: 25617184
Inoculum selection influences the biochemical methane potential of agro-industrial substrates.
De Vrieze J, Raport L, Willems B, Verbrugge S, Volcke E, Meers E, Angenent LT, Boon N., Microb Biotechnol 8(5), 2015
PMID: 25756301
Microbial population dynamics in response to increasing loadings of pre-hydrolyzed pig manure in an expanded granular sludge bed.
Wang H, Tao Y, Gao D, Liu G, Chen C, Ren N, van Lier JB, de Kreuk M., Water Res 87(), 2015
PMID: 26378729
Metagenome from a Spirulina digesting biogas reactor: analysis via binning of contigs and classification of short reads.
Nolla-Ardèvol V, Peces M, Strous M, Tegetmeyer HE., BMC Microbiol 15(), 2015
PMID: 26680455
Effect of ultrasound pre-treatment in the anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure with food waste and sludge.
Quiroga G, Castrillón L, Fernández-Nava Y, Marañón E, Negral L, Rodríguez-Iglesias J, Ormaechea P., Bioresour Technol 154(), 2014
PMID: 24384312
Feasibility of spent metalworking fluids as co-substrate for anaerobic co-digestion.
Rodriguez-Verde I, Regueiro L, Pena R, Álvarez JA, Lema JM, Carballa M., Bioresour Technol 155(), 2014
PMID: 24457301
Using pig manure to promote fermentation of sugarcane molasses alcohol wastewater and its effects on microbial community structure.
Shen P, Han F, Su S, Zhang J, Chen Z, Li J, Gan J, Feng B, Wu B., Bioresour Technol 155(), 2014
PMID: 24463412
Towards energy neutral wastewater treatment: methodology and state of the art.
Gao H, Scherson YD, Wells GF., Environ Sci Process Impacts 16(6), 2014
PMID: 24777396
Anaerobic digestion of pig and dairy manure under photo-dark fermentation condition.
Yin D, Liu W, Zhai N, Yang G, Wang X, Feng Y, Ren G., Bioresour Technol 166(), 2014
PMID: 24929281
Effect of ultrasound, low-temperature thermal and alkali pre-treatments on waste activated sludge rheology, hygienization and methane potential.
Ruiz-Hernando M, Martín-Díaz J, Labanda J, Mata-Alvarez J, Llorens J, Lucena F, Astals S., Water Res 61(), 2014
PMID: 24907480
Assessing anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with agroindustrial wastes: the link between environmental impacts and operational parameters.
Rodriguez-Verde I, Regueiro L, Carballa M, Hospido A, Lema JM., Sci Total Environ 497-498(), 2014
PMID: 25150742
Long-term monodigestion of crude glycerol in a UASB reactor.
Hutňan M, Kolesárová N, Bodík I, Czölderová M., Bioresour Technol 130(), 2013
PMID: 23306115
Pilot scale anaerobic co-digestion of municipal wastewater sludge with biodiesel waste glycerin.
Razaviarani V, Buchanan ID, Malik S, Katalambula H., Bioresour Technol 133(), 2013
PMID: 23428817
Pilot-scale anaerobic co-digestion of municipal wastewater sludge with restaurant grease trap waste.
Razaviarani V, Buchanan ID, Malik S, Katalambula H., J Environ Manage 123(), 2013
PMID: 23583789
Thermophilic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol: process performance and digestate stability.
Astals S, Nolla-Ardèvol V, Mata-Alvarez J., J Biotechnol 166(3), 2013
PMID: 23685137
A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia.
Rajagopal R, Massé DI, Singh G., Bioresour Technol 143(), 2013
PMID: 23835276
Anaerobic digestion of crude glycerol as sole substrate in mixed reactor.
Hutnan M, Kolesárová N, Bodik I., Environ Technol 34(13-16), 2013
PMID: 24350472
Anaerobic digestion of seven different sewage sludges: a biodegradability and modelling study.
Astals S, Esteban-Gutiérrez M, Fernández-Arévalo T, Aymerich E, García-Heras JL, Mata-Alvarez J., Water Res 47(16), 2013
PMID: 23938118
Generalised modelling approach for anaerobic co-digestion of fermentable substrates.
García-Gen S, Lema JM, Rodríguez J., Bioresour Technol 147(), 2013
PMID: 24012848
Enhancing methane production during the anaerobic digestion of crude glycerol using Japanese cedar charcoal.
Watanabe R, Tada C, Baba Y, Fukuda Y, Nakai Y., Bioresour Technol 150(), 2013
PMID: 24189339
Enhanced methane production from pig manure anaerobic digestion using fish and biodiesel wastes as co-substrates.
Regueiro L, Carballa M, Alvarez JA, Lema JM., Bioresour Technol 123(), 2012
PMID: 22940361

37 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.


AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
A comparative study of the advanced oxidation of 2,4-dichlorophenol
Al, J. Hazard. Mater. 19(3), 2004
A methodology for optimising feed composition for anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes.
Alvarez JA, Otero L, Lema JM., Bioresour. Technol. 101(4), 2009
PMID: 19833510
Optimising methane yield from anaerobic digestion of manure: effects of dairy systems and glycerine supplementation
Amon, Int. Congress Ser. 1293(), 2006
Anaerobic thermophilic digestion of manure at different ammonia loads: effect of temperature
Angelidaki, Water Res. 28(3), 1994
Modeling anaerobic codigestion of manure with olive oil mill effluent
Angelidaki, Water Sci. Technol. 36(), 1997
A comprehensive model of anaerobic bioconversion of complex substrates to biogas
Angelidaki I I, Ellegaard L, Ahring BK., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 63(3), 1999
PMID: 10099616
Anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural products and industrial wastes
Anna, Environ. Prot. Eng. 35(3), 2009
Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid.
Anthonisen AC, Loehr RC, Prakasam TB, Srinath EG., J Water Pollut Control Fed 48(5), 1976
PMID: 948105
Co-digestion of pig manure and glycerine: experimental and modelling study.
Astals S, Ariso M, Gali A, Mata-Alvarez J., J. Environ. Manage. 92(4), 2010
PMID: 21183273

APHA, 2005
The use of respiration indices in the composting process: a review
Barrena, Waste Manage. Res. 24(), 2006
Study of thermal hydrolysis as a pretreatment to mesophilic anaerobic digestion of pig slurry.
Bonmati A, Flotats X, Mateu L, Campos E., Water Sci. Technol. 44(4), 2001
PMID: 11575073
Anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure and glycerine
Chen, Am. Soc. Agric. and Biol. Eng. Annu. Int. Meeting 8(), 2008

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Anaerobic treatment of fibreboard manufacturing wastewaters in a pilot scale hybrid usbf reactor.
Fernandez JM, Omil F, Mendez R, Lema JM., Water Res. 35(17), 2001
PMID: 11791844
Long term operation of a thermophilic anaerobic reactor: process stability and efficiency at decreasing sludge retention time
Ferrer, Bioresour. Technol. 101(2), 2010
Co-digestion of sewage sludge with glycerol to boost biogas production.
Fountoulakis MS, Petousi I, Manios T., Waste Manag 30(10), 2010
PMID: 20434322
Modified version of ADM1 model for agro-waste application.
Gali A, Benabdallah T, Astals S, Mata-Alvarez J., Bioresour. Technol. 100(11), 2009
PMID: 19201603

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: inhibition by ammonia
Hansen, Water Res. 32(1), 1998
The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization.
Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P., Bioresour. Technol. 100(22), 2009
PMID: 19217772
The glycerin glut: options for the value-added conversion of crude glycerol resulting from biodiesel production
Johnson, Environ. Prog. 26(4), 2007
Ammonia inhibition in high-solids biogasification: an overview and practical solutions
Kayhanian, Environ. Technol. 20(), 1999
Improvement of the anaerobic treatment of potato processing wastewater in a UASB reactor by co-digestion with glycerol
Ma J, Van Wambeke M, Carballa M, Verstraete W., Biotechnol. Lett. 30(5), 2008
PMID: IND44039849
Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives
Mata-Alvarez, Bioresour. Technol. 74(1), 2000
Codigestion of solid wastes: a review of its uses and perspectives including modeling.
Mata-Alvarez J, Dosta J, Mace S, Astals S., Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 31(2), 2011
PMID: 21351815

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Pachauri, 2006

Pagliaro, 2008
Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic stability indices through a MSW biological treatment process.
Ponsa S, Gea T, Alerm L, Cerezo J, Sanchez A., Waste Manag 28(12), 2008
PMID: 18262404
Carbon mineralization kinetics as influenced by soil properties
Riffaldi, Biol. Fert. Soils 22(), 1996
Generation of biogas using crude glycerine from biodiesel production as a supplement to cattle slurry
Robra, Biomass Bioenergy 34(), 2010
Substituting energy crops with organic wastes and agro-industrial residues for biogas production.
Schievano A, D'Imporzano G, Adani F., J. Environ. Manage. 90(8), 2009
PMID: 19254824
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 22341889
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar