The Influence of Initial and Final Precision on Motor Planning: Individual Differences in End-State Comfort During Unimanual Grasping and Placing
Hughes C, Seegelke C, Schack T (2012)
Journal of Motor Behavior 44(3): 195-201.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Einrichtung
Fakultät für Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft > Abteilung für Psychologie > Arbeitseinheit 14 - Biopsychologie und Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
Research Institute for Cognition and Robotics
Fakultät für Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft > Abteilung Sportwissenschaft > Arbeitsbereich II - Neurokognition und Bewegung - Biomechanik
Center of Excellence - Cognitive Interaction Technology CITEC
Research Institute for Cognition and Robotics
Fakultät für Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft > Abteilung Sportwissenschaft > Arbeitsbereich II - Neurokognition und Bewegung - Biomechanik
Center of Excellence - Cognitive Interaction Technology CITEC
Abstract / Bemerkung
People will often grasp an object with an uncomfortable initial grasp if this affords more comfort at the end of the movement. The authors' primary objective was to examine whether grasp planning is influenced by precision demands at the start and end of the movement. Twenty right-handed individuals performed a unimanual grasping and placing task in which the precision requirements at the start and end of the movement were either identical (low initial and final precision, high initial and final precision) or different (low initial and high final precision, high initial and low final precision). The major finding to emerge was the presence of individual differences. 50% of participants changed their initial grasps based on the precision requirements of the task, and were more likely to satisfy end-state comfort when the final precision requirements were high than when they were low. In contrast, 50% of participants generally planned their movements to satisfy end-state comfort (regardless of precision requirements). The authors hypothesized that the former group of participants was sensitive to the precision demands of the task, and participants planned their grips in accordance with these demands. In contrast, the latter group of participants reduced the cognitive costs by using previously successful grasp plans.
Stichworte
individual differences;
end-state comfort;
grasping;
precision
Erscheinungsjahr
2012
Zeitschriftentitel
Journal of Motor Behavior
Band
44
Ausgabe
3
Seite(n)
195-201
ISSN
0022-2895
eISSN
1940-1027
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2510064
Zitieren
Hughes C, Seegelke C, Schack T. The Influence of Initial and Final Precision on Motor Planning: Individual Differences in End-State Comfort During Unimanual Grasping and Placing. Journal of Motor Behavior. 2012;44(3):195-201.
Hughes, C., Seegelke, C., & Schack, T. (2012). The Influence of Initial and Final Precision on Motor Planning: Individual Differences in End-State Comfort During Unimanual Grasping and Placing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 44(3), 195-201. doi:10.1080/00222895.2012.672483
Hughes, Charmayne, Seegelke, Christian, and Schack, Thomas. 2012. “The Influence of Initial and Final Precision on Motor Planning: Individual Differences in End-State Comfort During Unimanual Grasping and Placing”. Journal of Motor Behavior 44 (3): 195-201.
Hughes, C., Seegelke, C., and Schack, T. (2012). The Influence of Initial and Final Precision on Motor Planning: Individual Differences in End-State Comfort During Unimanual Grasping and Placing. Journal of Motor Behavior 44, 195-201.
Hughes, C., Seegelke, C., & Schack, T., 2012. The Influence of Initial and Final Precision on Motor Planning: Individual Differences in End-State Comfort During Unimanual Grasping and Placing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 44(3), p 195-201.
C. Hughes, C. Seegelke, and T. Schack, “The Influence of Initial and Final Precision on Motor Planning: Individual Differences in End-State Comfort During Unimanual Grasping and Placing”, Journal of Motor Behavior, vol. 44, 2012, pp. 195-201.
Hughes, C., Seegelke, C., Schack, T.: The Influence of Initial and Final Precision on Motor Planning: Individual Differences in End-State Comfort During Unimanual Grasping and Placing. Journal of Motor Behavior. 44, 195-201 (2012).
Hughes, Charmayne, Seegelke, Christian, and Schack, Thomas. “The Influence of Initial and Final Precision on Motor Planning: Individual Differences in End-State Comfort During Unimanual Grasping and Placing”. Journal of Motor Behavior 44.3 (2012): 195-201.
Daten bereitgestellt von European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)
13 Zitationen in Europe PMC
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
Anticipating different grips reduces bimanual end-state comfort: A tradeoff between goal-related and means-related planning processes.
Seegelke C, Weigelt M., PLoS One 13(1), 2018
PMID: 29309417
Seegelke C, Weigelt M., PLoS One 13(1), 2018
PMID: 29309417
Inverting the planning gradient: adjustment of grasps to late segments of multi-step object manipulations.
Mathew H, Kunde W, Herbort O., Exp Brain Res 235(5), 2017
PMID: 28233050
Mathew H, Kunde W, Herbort O., Exp Brain Res 235(5), 2017
PMID: 28233050
How the mode of action affects evidence of planning and movement kinematics in aging: End-state comfort in older adults.
Scharoun SM, Gonzalez DA, Roy EA, Bryden PJ., Dev Psychobiol 58(4), 2016
PMID: 26617081
Scharoun SM, Gonzalez DA, Roy EA, Bryden PJ., Dev Psychobiol 58(4), 2016
PMID: 26617081
Motor planning in different grasping tasks by capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.).
Sabbatini G, Meglio G, Truppa V., Behav Brain Res 312(), 2016
PMID: 27283976
Sabbatini G, Meglio G, Truppa V., Behav Brain Res 312(), 2016
PMID: 27283976
The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Knoblauch A, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 233(2), 2015
PMID: 25370347
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Knoblauch A, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 233(2), 2015
PMID: 25370347
Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall.
Seegelke C., Front Psychol 6(), 2015
PMID: 25688223
Seegelke C., Front Psychol 6(), 2015
PMID: 25688223
Too much anticipation? Large anticipatory adjustments of grasping movements to minimal object manipulations.
Herbort O., Hum Mov Sci 42(), 2015
PMID: 26004123
Herbort O., Hum Mov Sci 42(), 2015
PMID: 26004123
Frames of reference in action plan recall: influence of hand and handedness.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Wunsch K, van der Wel R, Weigelt M., Exp Brain Res 233(10), 2015
PMID: 26070901
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Wunsch K, van der Wel R, Weigelt M., Exp Brain Res 233(10), 2015
PMID: 26070901
Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schack T., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 25566153
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schack T., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 25566153
Optimal control in the critical phase of movement: a functional approach to motor planning processes.
Künzell S, Augste C, Hering M, Maier S, Meinzinger AM, Sießmeir D., Acta Psychol (Amst) 143(3), 2013
PMID: 23727597
Künzell S, Augste C, Hering M, Maier S, Meinzinger AM, Sießmeir D., Acta Psychol (Amst) 143(3), 2013
PMID: 23727597
Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Knoblauch A, Schack T., Acta Psychol (Amst) 144(3), 2013
PMID: 24095853
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Knoblauch A, Schack T., Acta Psychol (Amst) 144(3), 2013
PMID: 24095853
Simulating my own or others action plans?--Motor representations, not visual representations are recalled in motor memory.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schack T., PLoS One 8(12), 2013
PMID: 24367689
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schack T., PLoS One 8(12), 2013
PMID: 24367689
Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schütz C, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 222(1-2), 2012
PMID: 22885998
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schütz C, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 222(1-2), 2012
PMID: 22885998
18 References
Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Individual differences in extraversion and dopamine genetics predict neural reward responses.
Cohen MX, Young J, Baek JM, Kessler C, Ranganath C., Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 25(3), 2005
PMID: 16289773
Cohen MX, Young J, Baek JM, Kessler C, Ranganath C., Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 25(3), 2005
PMID: 16289773
Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans.
Cohen RG, Rosenbaum DA., Exp Brain Res 157(4), 2004
PMID: 15071711
Cohen RG, Rosenbaum DA., Exp Brain Res 157(4), 2004
PMID: 15071711
The end-state comfort effect in bimanual grip selection.
Fischman MG, Stodden DF, Lehman DM., Res Q Exerc Sport 74(1), 2003
PMID: 12659472
Fischman MG, Stodden DF, Lehman DM., Res Q Exerc Sport 74(1), 2003
PMID: 12659472
Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects.
Hughes CM, Franz EA., Exp Brain Res 188(4), 2008
PMID: 18443769
Hughes CM, Franz EA., Exp Brain Res 188(4), 2008
PMID: 18443769
Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.
Hughes CM, Haddad JM, Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, Ryu JH., Exp Brain Res 211(2), 2011
PMID: 21484393
Hughes CM, Haddad JM, Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, Ryu JH., Exp Brain Res 211(2), 2011
PMID: 21484393
Motor planning and execution in left- and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task.
Hughes CM, Reissig P, Seegelke C., Acta Psychol (Amst) 138(1), 2011
PMID: 21663882
Hughes CM, Reissig P, Seegelke C., Acta Psychol (Amst) 138(1), 2011
PMID: 21663882
Motor planning in bimanual object manipulation: two plans for two hands?
Janssen L, Craje C, Weigelt M, Steenbergen B., Motor Control 14(2), 2010
PMID: 20484772
Janssen L, Craje C, Weigelt M, Steenbergen B., Motor Control 14(2), 2010
PMID: 20484772
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Mohammed, 2009
The prehensile movements of the human hand.
NAPIER JR., J Bone Joint Surg Br 38-B(4), 1956
PMID: 13376678
NAPIER JR., J Bone Joint Surg Br 38-B(4), 1956
PMID: 13376678
Rosenbaum, 1990
From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect.
Rosenbaum DA, van Heugten CM, Caldwell GE., Acta Psychol (Amst) 94(1), 1996
PMID: 8885711
Rosenbaum DA, van Heugten CM, Caldwell GE., Acta Psychol (Amst) 94(1), 1996
PMID: 8885711
Rosenbaum, 1993
An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 215(1), 2011
PMID: 21938544
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 215(1), 2011
PMID: 21938544
Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect.
Short MW, Cauraugh JH., Acta Psychol (Amst) 100(3), 1999
PMID: 9894689
Short MW, Cauraugh JH., Acta Psychol (Amst) 100(3), 1999
PMID: 9894689
On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability.
Stanovich KE, West RF., J Pers Soc Psychol 94(4), 2008
PMID: 18361678
Stanovich KE, West RF., J Pers Soc Psychol 94(4), 2008
PMID: 18361678
Developing motor planning over ages.
Thibaut JP, Toussaint L., J Exp Child Psychol 105(1-2), 2009
PMID: 19919864
Thibaut JP, Toussaint L., J Exp Child Psychol 105(1-2), 2009
PMID: 19919864
Export
Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen
Web of Science
Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®Quellen
PMID: 22551086
PubMed | Europe PMC
Suchen in