Heritability of and early-environmental effects on variation in mating preferences

Schielzeth H, Bolund E, Forstmeier W (2009)
Evolution 64(4): 998-1006.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Schielzeth, HolgerUniBi ; Bolund, Elisabeth; Forstmeier, Wolfgang
Abstract / Bemerkung
Many species show substantial between-individual variation in mating preferences, but studying the causes of such variation remains a challenge. For example, the relative importance of heritable variation versus shared early environment effects (like sexual imprinting) on mating preferences has never been quantified in a population of animals. Here, we estimate the heritability of and early rearing effects on mate choice decisions in zebra finches based on the similarity of choices between pairs of genetic sisters raised apart and pairs of unrelated foster sisters. We found a low and nonsignificant heritability of preferences and no significant shared early rearing effects. A literature review shows that a low heritability of preferences is rather typical, whereas empirical tests for the relevance of sexual imprinting within populations are currently limited to very few studies. Although effects on preference functions (i.e., which male to prefer) were weak, we found strong individual consistency in choice behavior and part of this variation was heritable. It seems likely that variation in choice behavior (choosiness, responsiveness, sampling behavior) would produce patterns of nonrandom mating and this might be the more important source of between-individual differences in mating patterns.
Erscheinungsjahr
2009
Zeitschriftentitel
Evolution
Band
64
Ausgabe
4
Seite(n)
998-1006
ISSN
0014-3820
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2496068

Zitieren

Schielzeth H, Bolund E, Forstmeier W. Heritability of and early-environmental effects on variation in mating preferences. Evolution. 2009;64(4):998-1006.
Schielzeth, H., Bolund, E., & Forstmeier, W. (2009). Heritability of and early-environmental effects on variation in mating preferences. Evolution, 64(4), 998-1006. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00890.x
Schielzeth, Holger, Bolund, Elisabeth, and Forstmeier, Wolfgang. 2009. “Heritability of and early-environmental effects on variation in mating preferences”. Evolution 64 (4): 998-1006.
Schielzeth, H., Bolund, E., and Forstmeier, W. (2009). Heritability of and early-environmental effects on variation in mating preferences. Evolution 64, 998-1006.
Schielzeth, H., Bolund, E., & Forstmeier, W., 2009. Heritability of and early-environmental effects on variation in mating preferences. Evolution, 64(4), p 998-1006.
H. Schielzeth, E. Bolund, and W. Forstmeier, “Heritability of and early-environmental effects on variation in mating preferences”, Evolution, vol. 64, 2009, pp. 998-1006.
Schielzeth, H., Bolund, E., Forstmeier, W.: Heritability of and early-environmental effects on variation in mating preferences. Evolution. 64, 998-1006 (2009).
Schielzeth, Holger, Bolund, Elisabeth, and Forstmeier, Wolfgang. “Heritability of and early-environmental effects on variation in mating preferences”. Evolution 64.4 (2009): 998-1006.

10 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Choosiness, a neglected aspect of preference functions: a review of methods, challenges and statistical approaches.
Reinhold K, Schielzeth H., J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 201(1), 2015
PMID: 25398575
Fitness Benefits of Mate Choice for Compatibility in a Socially Monogamous Species.
Ihle M, Kempenaers B, Forstmeier W., PLoS Biol 13(9), 2015
PMID: 26366558
Heritability of preferences for multiple cues of mate quality in humans.
Zietsch BP, Verweij KJ, Burri AV., Evolution 66(6), 2012
PMID: 22671545
Environment-dependent selection on mate choice in a natural population of birds.
Robinson MR, van Doorn GS, Gustafsson L, Qvarnström A., Ecol Lett 15(6), 2012
PMID: 22487545
Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation.
Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, Mueller JC, Ellegren H, Kempenaers B., Mol Ecol 21(13), 2012
PMID: 22554318

51 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Sexual selection and mate choice.
Andersson M, Simmons LW., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 21(6), 2006
PMID: 16769428
Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks
Bakker TCM., 1993
The genetic basis of female mate preferences
Bakker TCM, Pomiankowski A., 1995
lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes
Bates D, Maechler M, Dai B., 2008
Comparative evaluation and its implications for mate choice.
Bateson M, Healy SD., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 20(12), 2005
PMID: 16701454
Sexual imprinting in human mate choice
Bereczkei T, Gyuris P, Weisfeld GE., 2004
Intrasexual competition in zebra finches, the role of beak colour and body size
Bolund E, Schielzeth H, Forstmeier W., 2007
Test of indirect models of selection in the Trinidad guppy
Breden F, Hornaday K., 1994
Multiple sexual ornaments coevolve with multiple mating preferences
Brooks R, Couldridge V., 1999
Variation in female choice of mates: condition influences selectivity
Burley NT, Foster VS., 2006
The use of multiple cues in mate choice.
Candolin U., Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 78(4), 2003
PMID: 14700392
Genetic variation in male song and female song preference in the grasshopper Chorthippus brunneus (Orthoptera: Acrididae)
Charalambous M, Butlin RK, Hewitt GM., 1994
Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice.
Chenoweth SF, Blows MW., Nat. Rev. Genet. 7(9), 2006
PMID: 16921346
Heritable variation in pheromone response of the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae)
Collins RD, Cardé RT., 1989
Optimal assessment of multiple cues
Fawcett TW, Johnstone RA., 2003

Fisher RA., 1930
Repeatability of mate choice in the zebra finch: consistency within and between females
Forstmeier W, Birkhead TR., 2004
Development of polymorphic microsatellite markers for the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata)
FORSTMEIER W, SCHIELZETH H, SCHNEIDER M, KEMPENAERS B., Mol. Ecol. Notes 7(6), 2007
PMID: IND43974441
Effect of artificial selection on male colour patterns on mating preference of female guppies
Houde AE., 1994
Ecological significance of imprinting and early learning
Immelmann K., 1975
Paternal inheritance of a female moth's mating preference.
Iyengar VK, Reeve HK, Eisner T., Nature 419(6909), 2002
PMID: 12397356
Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
Jennions MD, Petrie M., Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 72(2), 1997
PMID: 9155244
The direction of mothers and daughters preferences and the heritability of male ornaments in red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus)
Johnson K, Thornhill R, Ligon JD, Zuk M., 1993
Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.
Lande R., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78(6), 1981
PMID: 16593036
Female mating preference is genetic.
Majerus ME, O'Donald P, Weir J., Nature 300(5892), 1982
PMID: 7144902
Female collared flycatchers learn to prefer males with an artificial novel ornament
Qvarnström A, Blomgren V, Wiley C, Svedin N., 2004

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2008
Variation, but no covariance, in female preference functions and male song in a natural population of Drosophila montana
Ritchie MG, Saarikettu M, Hoikkala A., 2005
Genotypic variation in calling song and female preferences of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus
Simmons LW., 2004
Sexual selection: the evolution of conspicuous characteristics in birds by means of imprinting
ten C, Bateson P., 1988
Sexual imprinting can induce sexual preferences for exaggerated parental traits.
ten Cate C, Verzijden MN, Etman E., Curr. Biol. 16(11), 2006
PMID: 16753567
Genetics of female mate discrimination of heterospecific males in Nasonia (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae)
Velthuis BJ, Yang WC, van T, Werren JH., 2005
Measuring female mating preferences.
Wagner WE., Anim Behav 55(4), 1998
PMID: 9632487
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences.
Widemo F, Sæther SA., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 14(1), 1999
PMID: 10234244
Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly
Wilkinson GS, Reillo PR., 1994
Time spent with a male is a good indicator of mate preference in female zebra finches
Witte K., 2006
Mate selection-a selection for a handicap.
Zahavi A., J. Theor. Biol. 53(1), 1975
PMID: 1195756

Zann RA., 1996
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 19895552
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar