The Complexity of Personality: Advantages of a Genetically Sensitive Multi-Group Design

Hahn E, Spinath FM, Siedler T, Wagner GG, Schupp J, Kandler C (2012)
Behavior Genetics 42(2): 221-233.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Campus/VPN Hahn_et_al.__2012__BG.pdf
Autor*in
Hahn, Elisabeth; Spinath, Frank M.; Siedler, Thomas; Wagner, Gert G.; Schupp, Jürgen; Kandler, ChristianUniBi
Abstract / Bemerkung
Findings from many behavioral genetic studies utilizing the classical twin design suggest that genetic and non-shared environmental effects play a significant role in human personality traits. This study focuses on the methodological advantages of extending the sampling frame to include multiple dyads of relatives. We investigated the sensitivity of heritability estimates to the inclusion of sibling pairs, mother–child pairs and grandparent–grandchild pairs from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study in addition to a classical German twin sample consisting of monozygotic- and dizygotic twins. The resulting dataset contained 1.308 pairs, including 202 monozygotic and 147 dizygotic twin pairs, along with 419 sibling pairs, 438 mother–child dyads, and 102 grandparent–child dyads. This genetically sensitive multi-group design allowed the simultaneous testing of additive and non-additive genetic, common and specific environmental effects, including cultural transmission and twin-specific environmental influences. Using manifest and latent modeling of phenotypes (i.e., controlling for measurement error), we compare results from the extended sample with those from the twin sample alone and discuss implications for future research.
Erscheinungsjahr
2012
Zeitschriftentitel
Behavior Genetics
Band
42
Ausgabe
2
Seite(n)
221-233
ISSN
0001-8244
eISSN
1573-3297
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2472854

Zitieren

Hahn E, Spinath FM, Siedler T, Wagner GG, Schupp J, Kandler C. The Complexity of Personality: Advantages of a Genetically Sensitive Multi-Group Design. Behavior Genetics. 2012;42(2):221-233.
Hahn, E., Spinath, F. M., Siedler, T., Wagner, G. G., Schupp, J., & Kandler, C. (2012). The Complexity of Personality: Advantages of a Genetically Sensitive Multi-Group Design. Behavior Genetics, 42(2), 221-233. doi:10.1007/s10519-011-9493-y
Hahn, Elisabeth, Spinath, Frank M., Siedler, Thomas, Wagner, Gert G., Schupp, Jürgen, and Kandler, Christian. 2012. “The Complexity of Personality: Advantages of a Genetically Sensitive Multi-Group Design”. Behavior Genetics 42 (2): 221-233.
Hahn, E., Spinath, F. M., Siedler, T., Wagner, G. G., Schupp, J., and Kandler, C. (2012). The Complexity of Personality: Advantages of a Genetically Sensitive Multi-Group Design. Behavior Genetics 42, 221-233.
Hahn, E., et al., 2012. The Complexity of Personality: Advantages of a Genetically Sensitive Multi-Group Design. Behavior Genetics, 42(2), p 221-233.
E. Hahn, et al., “The Complexity of Personality: Advantages of a Genetically Sensitive Multi-Group Design”, Behavior Genetics, vol. 42, 2012, pp. 221-233.
Hahn, E., Spinath, F.M., Siedler, T., Wagner, G.G., Schupp, J., Kandler, C.: The Complexity of Personality: Advantages of a Genetically Sensitive Multi-Group Design. Behavior Genetics. 42, 221-233 (2012).
Hahn, Elisabeth, Spinath, Frank M., Siedler, Thomas, Wagner, Gert G., Schupp, Jürgen, and Kandler, Christian. “The Complexity of Personality: Advantages of a Genetically Sensitive Multi-Group Design”. Behavior Genetics 42.2 (2012): 221-233.
Volltext(e)
Name
Hahn_et_al.__2012__BG.pdf
Access Level
Campus/VPN UniBi Only
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2019-09-06T09:17:59Z
MD5 Prüfsumme
84720bb0e0fa2d47ce818cb21b08b000


7 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

The Role of Nature and Nurture for Individual Differences in Primary Emotional Systems: Evidence from a Twin Study.
Montag C, Hahn E, Reuter M, Spinath FM, Davis K, Panksepp J., PLoS One 11(3), 2016
PMID: 26999649
The genetic and environmental roots of variance in negativity toward foreign nationals.
Kandler C, Lewis GJ, Feldhaus LH, Riemann R., Behav Genet 45(2), 2015
PMID: 25534512
Molecular genetics and subjective well-being.
Rietveld CA, Cesarini D, Benjamin DJ, Koellinger PD, De Neve JE, Tiemeier H, Johannesson M, Magnusson PK, Pedersen NL, Krueger RF, Bartels M., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(24), 2013
PMID: 23708117
Shared environmental influences on personality: a combined twin and adoption approach.
Matteson LK, McGue M, Iacono WG., Behav Genet 43(6), 2013
PMID: 24065564
[The Socioeconomic Panel (SOEP)].
Schupp J., Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 55(6-7), 2012
PMID: 22736154

57 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.


JL, 2006
Twin zygosity. Automated determination with microsatellites.
Becker A, Busjahn A, Faulhaber HD, Bahring S, Robertson J, Schuster H, Luft FC., J Reprod Med 42(5), 1997
PMID: 9172114
Patterns and sources of adult personality development: growth curve analyses of the NEO PI-R scales in a longitudinal twin study.
Bleidorn W, Kandler C, Riemann R, Spinath FM, Angleitner A., J Pers Soc Psychol 97(1), 2009
PMID: 19586245
Genetic and environmental influences on observed personality: evidence from the German Observational Study of Adult Twins.
Borkenau P, Riemann R, Angleitner A, Spinath FM., J Pers Soc Psychol 80(4), 2001
PMID: 11316228
Genes, evolution, and personality.
Bouchard TJ Jr, Loehlin JC., Behav. Genet. 31(3), 2001
PMID: 11699599
Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences.
Bouchard TJ Jr, McGue M., J. Neurobiol. 54(1), 2003
PMID: 12486697

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1993
Sources of human psychological differences: the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart.
Bouchard TJ Jr, Lykken DT, McGue M, Segal NL, Tellegen A., Science 250(4978), 1990
PMID: 2218526

PT, 1992

PT, 1985

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

LJ, 1989

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Comparing the biological and cultural inheritance of personality and social attitudes in the Virginia 30,000 study of twins and their relatives.
Eaves L, Heath A, Martin N, Maes H, Neale M, Kendler K, Kirk K, Corey L., Twin Res 2(2), 1999
PMID: 10480741

DM, GeneScreen 1(), 2000

DS, 1960

SL, 1981

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Heritability of facet-level traits in a cross-cultural twin sample: support for a hierarchical model of personality.
Jang KL, McCrae RR, Angleitner A, Riemann R, Livesley WJ., J Pers Soc Psychol 74(6), 1998
PMID: 9654759

OP, 1991

AM, 2008
Sources of cumulative continuity in personality: a longitudinal multiple-rater twin study.
Kandler C, Bleidorn W, Riemann R, Spinath FM, Thiel W, Angleitner A., J Pers Soc Psychol 98(6), 2010
PMID: 20515254
Modeling extended twin family data I: description of the Cascade model.
Keller MC, Medland SE, Duncan LE, Hatemi PK, Neale MC, Maes HH, Eaves LJ., Twin Res Hum Genet 12(1), 2009
PMID: 19210175
A test of the equal-environment assumption in twin studies of psychiatric illness.
Kendler KS, Neale MC, Kessler RC, Heath AC, Eaves LJ., Behav. Genet. 23(1), 1993
PMID: 8476388
Profiting from controversy. Lessons from the person-situation debate.
Kenrick DT, Funder DC., Am Psychol 43(1), 1988
PMID: 3279875

RB, 1998

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

IM, Aust J Psychol 61(2), 2009

RJA, 2002
Personality resemblances in adoptive families when the children are late-adolescent or adult.
Loehlin JC, Willerman L, Horn JM., J Pers Soc Psychol 48(2), 1985
PMID: 3981401

JC, J Res Pers 32(), 1998

JC, J Res Pers 37(), 2003
Adjustment of twin data for the effects of age and sex.
McGue M, Bouchard TJ Jr., Behav. Genet. 14(4), 1984
PMID: 6542356

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Using non-normal SEM to resolve the ACDE model in the classical twin design.
Ozaki K, Toyoda H, Iwama N, Kubo S, Ando J., Behav. Genet. 41(2), 2010
PMID: 20703791

R, 1994
Adoption results for self-reported personality: evidence for nonadditive genetic effects?
Plomin R, Corley R, Caspi A, Fulker DW, DeFries J., J Pers Soc Psychol 75(1), 1998
PMID: 9686459

R, 2008
A note on the statistical power in extended twin designs.
Posthuma D, Boomsma DI., Behav. Genet. 30(2), 2000
PMID: 10979605

D, 2000
Genetic and environmental influences on substance initiation, use, and problem use in adolescents.
Rhee SH, Hewitt JK, Young SE, Corley RP, Crowley TJ, Stallings MC., Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 60(12), 2003
PMID: 14662558
Twin method: defense of a critical assumption.
Scarr S, Carter-Saltzman L., Behav. Genet. 9(6), 1979
PMID: 263638
CoSMoS and TwinPaW: initial report on two new German twin studies.
Spinath FM, Wolf H., Twin Res Hum Genet 9(6), 2006
PMID: 17254409
The Jena Twin Registry and the Jena Twin Study of Social Attitudes (JeTSSA).
Stossel K, Kampfe N, Riemann R., Twin Res Hum Genet 9(6), 2006
PMID: 17254408

GG, J Appl Soc Sci Stud 127(1), 2007
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 21858515
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar