Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception

Di Luca M, Knörlein B, Ernst MO, Harders M (2011)
Brain Research Bulletin 85(5): 245-259.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Di Luca, M; Knörlein, B; Ernst, Marc O.UniBi; Harders, M
Abstract / Bemerkung
Spring compliance is perceived by combining the sensed force exerted by the spring with the displacement caused by the action (sensed through vision and proprioception). We investigated the effect of delay of visual and force information with respect to proprioception to understand how visual–haptic perception of compliance is achieved. First, we confirm an earlier result that force delay increases perceived compliance. Furthermore, we find that perceived compliance decreases with a delay in the visual information. These effects of delay on perceived compliance would not be present if the perceptual system would utilize all force–displacement information available during the interaction. Both delays generate a bias in compliance which is opposite in the loading and unloading phases of the interaction. To explain these findings, we propose that information during the loading phase of the spring displacement is weighted more than information obtained during unloading. We confirm this hypothesis by showing that sensitivity to compliance during loading movements is much higher than during unloading movements. Moreover, we show that visual and proprioceptive information about the hand position are used for compliance perception depending on the sensitivity to compliance. Finally, by analyzing participants’ movements we show that these two factors (loading/unloading and reliability) account for the change in perceived compliance due to visual and force delays.
Erscheinungsjahr
2011
Zeitschriftentitel
Brain Research Bulletin
Band
85
Ausgabe
5
Seite(n)
245-259
ISSN
0361-9230
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2286060

Zitieren

Di Luca M, Knörlein B, Ernst MO, Harders M. Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception. Brain Research Bulletin. 2011;85(5):245-259.
Di Luca, M., Knörlein, B., Ernst, M. O., & Harders, M. (2011). Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception. Brain Research Bulletin, 85(5), 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2010.02.009
Di Luca, M, Knörlein, B, Ernst, Marc O., and Harders, M. 2011. “Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception”. Brain Research Bulletin 85 (5): 245-259.
Di Luca, M., Knörlein, B., Ernst, M. O., and Harders, M. (2011). Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception. Brain Research Bulletin 85, 245-259.
Di Luca, M., et al., 2011. Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception. Brain Research Bulletin, 85(5), p 245-259.
M. Di Luca, et al., “Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception”, Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 85, 2011, pp. 245-259.
Di Luca, M., Knörlein, B., Ernst, M.O., Harders, M.: Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception. Brain Research Bulletin. 85, 245-259 (2011).
Di Luca, M, Knörlein, B, Ernst, Marc O., and Harders, M. “Effects of visual-haptic asynchronies and loading-unloading movements on compliance perception”. Brain Research Bulletin 85.5 (2011): 245-259.

15 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

A recursive Bayesian updating model of haptic stiffness perception.
Wu B, Klatzky RL., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 44(6), 2018
PMID: 29723007
Neglect-Like Effects on Drawing Symmetry Induced by Adaptation to a Laterally Asymmetric Visuomotor Delay.
Avraham C, Avraham G, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Nisky I., Front Hum Neurosci 12(), 2018
PMID: 30233340
On the Transparency of Client/Server-Based Haptic Interaction with Deformable Objects.
Schuwerk C, Xu X, Steinbach E., IEEE Trans Haptics 10(2), 2017
PMID: 28113990
Representing delayed force feedback as a combination of current and delayed states.
Avraham G, Mawase F, Karniel A, Shmuelof L, Donchin O, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Nisky I., J Neurophysiol 118(4), 2017
PMID: 28724784
The Mechanical Representation of Temporal Delays.
Leib R, Karniel A, Mussa-Ivaldi FA., Sci Rep 7(1), 2017
PMID: 28794465
State-Based Delay Representation and Its Transfer from a Game of Pong to Reaching and Tracking.
Avraham G, Leib R, Pressman A, Simo LS, Karniel A, Shmuelof L, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Nisky I., eNeuro 4(6), 2017
PMID: 29379875
Touch influences perceived gloss.
Adams WJ, Kerrigan IS, Graf EW., Sci Rep 6(), 2016
PMID: 26915492
Awareness shaping or shaped by prediction and postdiction: Editorial.
Yamada Y, Kawabe T, Miyazaki M., Front Psychol 6(), 2015
PMID: 25762959
Rendered and Characterized Closed-Loop Accuracy of Impedance-Type Haptic Displays.
Colonnese N, Siu AF, Abbott CM, Okamura AM., IEEE Trans Haptics 8(4), 2015
PMID: 26208363
Delays in Admittance-Controlled Haptic Devices Make Simulated Masses Feel Heavier.
Kuling IA, Smeets JB, Lammertse P, Onneweer B, Mugge W., PLoS One 10(9), 2015
PMID: 26361353
Imposed visual feedback delay of an action changes mass perception based on the sensory prediction error.
Honda T, Hagura N, Yoshioka T, Imamizu H., Front Psychol 4(), 2013
PMID: 24167494
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 20193747
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar