Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort

Hughes C, Haddad JM, Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, Ryu JH (2011)
Experimental Brain Research 211(2): 219-229.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
DOI
Autor*in
Hughes, CharmayneUniBi; Haddad, J.M.; Franz, E.A.; Zelaznik, H.N.; Ryu, J.H.
Einrichtung
Center of Excellence - Cognitive Interaction Technology CITEC
Fakultät für Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft > Abteilung Sportwissenschaft > Arbeitsbereich II - Neurokognition und Bewegung - Biomechanik
Erscheinungsjahr
2011
Zeitschriftentitel
Experimental Brain Research
Band
211
Ausgabe
2
Seite(n)
219-229
ISSN
0014-4819
eISSN
1432-1106
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2284057

Zitieren

Hughes C, Haddad JM, Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, Ryu JH. Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort. Experimental Brain Research. 2011;211(2):219-229.
Hughes, C., Haddad, J. M., Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., & Ryu, J. H. (2011). Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort. Experimental Brain Research, 211(2), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2673-4
Hughes, Charmayne, Haddad, J.M., Franz, E.A., Zelaznik, H.N., and Ryu, J.H. 2011. “Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort”. Experimental Brain Research 211 (2): 219-229.
Hughes, C., Haddad, J. M., Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., and Ryu, J. H. (2011). Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort. Experimental Brain Research 211, 219-229.
Hughes, C., et al., 2011. Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort. Experimental Brain Research, 211(2), p 219-229.
C. Hughes, et al., “Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort”, Experimental Brain Research, vol. 211, 2011, pp. 219-229.
Hughes, C., Haddad, J.M., Franz, E.A., Zelaznik, H.N., Ryu, J.H.: Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort. Experimental Brain Research. 211, 219-229 (2011).
Hughes, Charmayne, Haddad, J.M., Franz, E.A., Zelaznik, H.N., and Ryu, J.H. “Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort”. Experimental Brain Research 211.2 (2011): 219-229.

20 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Anticipating different grips reduces bimanual end-state comfort: A tradeoff between goal-related and means-related planning processes.
Seegelke C, Weigelt M., PLoS One 13(1), 2018
PMID: 29309417
The relation between measures of cognitive and motor functioning in 5- to 6-year-old children.
Stöckel T, Hughes CM., Psychol Res 80(4), 2016
PMID: 25820330
Cognitive framing in action.
Huhn JM, Potts CA, Rosenbaum DA., Cognition 151(), 2016
PMID: 26970853
The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Knoblauch A, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 233(2), 2015
PMID: 25370347
The effect of endpoint congruency on bimanual transport and rotation tasks.
Mason AH, Bryden PJ., Front Psychol 6(), 2015
PMID: 25713546
Too much anticipation? Large anticipatory adjustments of grasping movements to minimal object manipulations.
Herbort O., Hum Mov Sci 42(), 2015
PMID: 26004123
Frames of reference in action plan recall: influence of hand and handedness.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Wunsch K, van der Wel R, Weigelt M., Exp Brain Res 233(10), 2015
PMID: 26070901
Limits of end-state planning.
Hermens F, Kral D, Rosenbaum DA., Acta Psychol (Amst) 148(), 2014
PMID: 24531145
Problems in planning bimanually incongruent grasp postures relate to simultaneous response specification processes.
Hughes CM, Seegelke C, Reissig P., Brain Cogn 87(), 2014
PMID: 24650762
Symmetries in action: on the interactive nature of planning constraints for bimanual object manipulation.
Huhn JM, Schimpf KA, van der Wel RP., Exp Brain Res 232(12), 2014
PMID: 25160868
Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schack T., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 25566153
Interlimb coordination during a cooperative bimanual object manipulation task.
Hughes CM, Mäueler B, Tepper H, Seegelke C., Laterality 18(6), 2013
PMID: 23439109
Perturbations in action goal influence bimanual grasp posture planning.
Hughes CM, Seegelke C., J Mot Behav 45(6), 2013
PMID: 24006878
Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Knoblauch A, Schack T., Acta Psychol (Amst) 144(3), 2013
PMID: 24095853
Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children.
Stöckel T, Hughes CM, Schack T., Psychol Res 76(6), 2012
PMID: 22075763
The influence of initial and final precision on motor planning: individual differences in end-state comfort during unimanual grasping and placing.
Hughes CM, Seegelke C, Schack T., J Mot Behav 44(3), 2012
PMID: 22551086
Effects of stimulus cueing on bimanual grasp posture planning.
Hughes CM, Seegelke C, Reissig P, Schütz C., Exp Brain Res 219(3), 2012
PMID: 22562588
Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schütz C, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 222(1-2), 2012
PMID: 22885998
Motor planning and execution in left- and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task.
Hughes CM, Reissig P, Seegelke C., Acta Psychol (Amst) 138(1), 2011
PMID: 21663882
An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 215(1), 2011
PMID: 21938544

36 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Control of multimovement coordination: sensorimotor mechanisms in speech motor programming.
Abbs JH, Gracco VL, Cole KJ., J Mot Behav 16(2), 1984
PMID: 14713665
The speed-accuracy trade-off in manual prehension: effects of movement amplitude, object size and object width on kinematic characteristics.
Bootsma RJ, Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Zaal FT., Exp Brain Res 98(3), 1994
PMID: 8056073
Coordination between the transport and the grasp components during prehension movements.
Chieffi S, Gentilucci M., Exp Brain Res 94(3), 1993
PMID: 8359261
Evidence of motor planning in infant reaching behavior.
Claxton LJ, Keen R, McCarty ME., Psychol Sci 14(4), 2003
PMID: 12807409
On the normal use of reflexes.
Easton TA., Am. Sci. 60(5), 1972
PMID: 4560171
The end-state comfort effect in bimanual grip selection.
Fischman MG, Stodden DF, Lehman DM., Res Q Exerc Sport 74(1), 2003
PMID: 12659472

EA, 2003
Conceptual unifying constraints override sensorimotor interference during anticipatory control of bimanual actions.
Franz EA, McCormick R., Exp Brain Res 205(2), 2010
PMID: 20652230
Spatial topological constraints in a bimanual task.
Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, McCabe G., Acta Psychol (Amst) 77(2), 1991
PMID: 1759589

EA, Psychol Sci 7(), 1996
Spatial conceptual influences on the coordination of bimanual actions: when a dual task becomes a single task.
Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, Swinnen SS, Walter C., J Mot Behav 33(1), 2001
PMID: 11265060
Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects.
Hughes CM, Franz EA., Exp Brain Res 188(4), 2008
PMID: 18443769
Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance.
Janssen L, Beuting M, Meulenbroek R, Steenbergen B., Exp Brain Res 192(1), 2008
PMID: 18751972
Motor planning in bimanual object manipulation: two plans for two hands?
Janssen L, Craje C, Weigelt M, Steenbergen B., Motor Control 14(2), 2010
PMID: 20484772
Behavioral evidence for left-hemisphere specialization of motor planning.
Janssen L, Meulenbroek RG, Steenbergen B., Exp Brain Res 209(1), 2010
PMID: 21184219
The timing of natural prehension movements.
Jeannerod M., J Mot Behav 16(3), 1984
PMID: 15151851

JAS, Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 18(), 1984
On the coordination of two-handed movements.
Kelso JA, Southard DL, Goodman D., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 5(2), 1979
PMID: 528935
Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: evidence for coordinative structures.
Kelso JA, Tuller B, Vatikiotis-Bateson E, Fowler CA., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10(6), 1984
PMID: 6239907
Goal congruency in bimanual object manipulation.
Kunde W, Weigelt M., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31(1), 2005
PMID: 15709869
Goal congruency without stimulus congruency in bimanual coordination.
Kunde W, Krauss H, Weigelt M., Psychol Res 73(1), 2008
PMID: 18320217
Two functionally different synergies during arm reaching movements involving the trunk.
Ma S, Feldman AG., J. Neurophysiol. 73(5), 1995
PMID: 7623104
Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.
Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Jeannerod M, Athenes S, Dugas C., Can J Psychol 41(3), 1987
PMID: 3502905
Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination.
Mechsner F, Kerzel D, Knoblich G, Prinz W., Nature 414(6859), 2001
PMID: 11689944

DA, 1990

DA, 1993
From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect.
Rosenbaum DA, van Heugten CM, Caldwell GE., Acta Psychol (Amst) 94(1), 1996
PMID: 8885711
Kinematic and electromyographic responses to perturbation of the jaw.
Shaiman S., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86(1), 1989
PMID: 2754110
Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect.
Short MW, Cauraugh JH., Acta Psychol (Amst) 100(3), 1999
PMID: 9894689

MT, Behav Brain Sci 2(), 1979

MT, Am Psychol 45(), 1991
Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance.
van der Wel RP, Rosenbaum DA., Exp Brain Res 205(3), 2010
PMID: 20658129
Re-examining structural constraints on the initiation of bimanual movements: the role of starting locations, movement amplitudes, and target locations.
Weigelt M., Hum Mov Sci 26(2), 2007
PMID: 17343946
End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation.
Weigelt M, Kunde W, Prinz W., Exp Psychol 53(2), 2006
PMID: 16909939
Target-related coupling in bimanual reaching movements.
Weigelt M, Rieger M, Mechsner F, Prinz W., Psychol Res 71(4), 2006
PMID: 16397811
The effects of object weight on the kinematics of prehension.
Weir PL, MacKenzie CL, Marteniuk RG, Cargoe SL, Frazer MB., J Mot Behav 23(3), 1991
PMID: 14766516
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 21484393
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar