Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability

van Ee R, van Dam L, Brouwer GJ (2005)
VISION RESEARCH 45(1): 41-55.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
van Ee, R.; van Dam, LoesUniBi ; Brouwer, G.J.
Page URI


van Ee R, van Dam L, Brouwer GJ. Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. VISION RESEARCH. 2005;45(1):41-55.
van Ee, R., van Dam, L., & Brouwer, G. J. (2005). Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. VISION RESEARCH, 45(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.030
van Ee, R., van Dam, Loes, and Brouwer, G.J. 2005. “Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability”. VISION RESEARCH 45 (1): 41-55.
van Ee, R., van Dam, L., and Brouwer, G. J. (2005). Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. VISION RESEARCH 45, 41-55.
van Ee, R., van Dam, L., & Brouwer, G.J., 2005. Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. VISION RESEARCH, 45(1), p 41-55.
R. van Ee, L. van Dam, and G.J. Brouwer, “Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability”, VISION RESEARCH, vol. 45, 2005, pp. 41-55.
van Ee, R., van Dam, L., Brouwer, G.J.: Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. VISION RESEARCH. 45, 41-55 (2005).
van Ee, R., van Dam, Loes, and Brouwer, G.J. “Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability”. VISION RESEARCH 45.1 (2005): 41-55.

87 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Individual differences in change blindness are predicted by the strength and stability of visual representations.
Andermane N, Bosten JM, Seth AK, Ward J., Neurosci Conscious 2019(1), 2019
PMID: 30697440
Perceptual flexibility is coupled with reduced executive inhibition in students of the visual arts.
Chamberlain R, Swinnen L, Heeren S, Wagemans J., Br J Psychol 109(2), 2018
PMID: 28657648
Genomic Analyses of Visual Cognition: Perceptual Rivalry and Top-Down Control.
Chen B, Zhu Z, Na R, Fang W, Zhang W, Zhou Q, Zhou S, Lei H, Huang A, Chen T, Ni D, Gu Y, Liu J, Fang F, Rao Y., J Neurosci 38(45), 2018
PMID: 30242048
Inhibition-excitation balance in the parietal cortex modulates volitional control for auditory and visual multistability.
Kondo HM, Pressnitzer D, Shimada Y, Kochiyama T, Kashino M., Sci Rep 8(1), 2018
PMID: 30267021
Newly acquired audio-visual associations bias perception in binocular rivalry.
Einhäuser W, Methfessel P, Bendixen A., Vision Res 133(), 2017
PMID: 28237813
fMRI-based decoding of reward effects in binocular rivalry.
Wilbertz G, van Kemenade BM, Schmack K, Sterzer P., Neurosci Conscious 2017(1), 2017
PMID: 30042846
Ego depletion in visual perception: Ego-depleted viewers experience less ambiguous figure reversal.
Wimmer MC, Stirk S, Hancock PJB., Psychon Bull Rev 24(5), 2017
PMID: 28229298
Aging into Perceptual Control: A Dynamic Causal Modeling for fMRI Study of Bistable Perception.
Dowlati E, Adams SE, Stiles AB, Moran RJ., Front Hum Neurosci 10(), 2016
PMID: 27064235
Assessing the validity of subjective reports in the auditory streaming paradigm.
Farkas D, Denham SL, Bendixen A, Winkler I., J Acoust Soc Am 139(4), 2016
PMID: 27106324
Assessing Attention Deficit by Binocular Rivalry.
Amador-Campos JA, Aznar-Casanova JA, Ortiz-Guerra JJ, Moreno-Sánchez M, Medina-Peña A., J Atten Disord 19(12), 2015
PMID: 23569154
Temporal dynamics of different cases of bi-stable figure-ground perception.
Kogo N, Hermans L, Stuer D, van Ee R, van Ee R, Wagemans J., Vision Res 106(), 2015
PMID: 25451239
Competition with and without priority control: linking rivalry to attention through winner-take-all networks with memory.
Marx S, Gruenhage G, Walper D, Rutishauser U, Einhäuser W., Ann N Y Acad Sci 1339(), 2015
PMID: 25581077
Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression.
Moors P, Huygelier H, Wagemans J, de-Wit L, van Ee R, van Ee R., Iperception 6(1), 2015
PMID: 26034573
Sensory memory of illusory depth in structure-from-motion.
Pastukhov A, Lissner A, Füllekrug J, Braun J., Atten Percept Psychophys 76(1), 2014
PMID: 24097015
Interpreting the temporal dynamics of perceptual rivalries.
Gallagher RM, Arnold DH., Perception 43(11), 2014
PMID: 25638939
Event-related potential responses to perceptual reversals are modulated by working memory load.
Intaitė M, Koivisto M, Castelo-Branco M., Neuropsychologia 56(), 2014
PMID: 24565733
Multisensory constraints on awareness.
Deroy O, Chen YC, Spence C., Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369(1641), 2014
PMID: 24639579
Online tracking of the contents of conscious perception using real-time fMRI.
Reichert C, Fendrich R, Bernarding J, Tempelmann C, Hinrichs H, Rieger JW., Front Neurosci 8(), 2014
PMID: 24904260
Action imitation changes perceptual alternations in binocular rivalry.
Di Pace E, Saracini C., PLoS One 9(5), 2014
PMID: 24870450
Top-down influences on ambiguous perception: the role of stable and transient states of the observer.
Scocchia L, Valsecchi M, Triesch J., Front Hum Neurosci 8(), 2014
PMID: 25538601
Age-related deficits in attentional control of perceptual rivalry.
Aydin S, Strang NC, Manahilov V., Vision Res 77(), 2013
PMID: 23206550
Effects of attention on visual experience during monocular rivalry.
Reavis EA, Kohler PJ, Caplovitz GP, Wheatley TP, Tse PU., Vision Res 83(), 2013
PMID: 23499978
Visual working memory contents bias ambiguous structure from motion perception.
Scocchia L, Valsecchi M, Gegenfurtner KR, Triesch J., PLoS One 8(3), 2013
PMID: 23527141
Eye rivalry and object rivalry in the intact and split-brain.
Ritchie KL, Bannerman RL, Turk DJ, Sahraie A., Vision Res 91(), 2013
PMID: 23973439
Binocular rivalry: competition and inhibition in visual perception.
Alais D., Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 3(1), 2012
PMID: 26302474
Separability and commonality of auditory and visual bistable perception.
Kondo HM, Kitagawa N, Kitamura MS, Koizumi A, Nomura M, Kashino M., Cereb Cortex 22(8), 2012
PMID: 21965442
Interocular conflict attracts attention.
Paffen CL, Hessels RS, Van der Stigchel S., Atten Percept Psychophys 74(2), 2012
PMID: 22167536
Binocular rivalry alternations and their relation to visual adaptation.
Roumani D, Moutoussis K., Front Hum Neurosci 6(), 2012
PMID: 22403533
Assessing the effects of audiovisual semantic congruency on the perception of a bistable figure.
Hsiao JY, Chen YC, Spence C, Yeh SL., Conscious Cogn 21(2), 2012
PMID: 22386069
Visual rivalry without spatial conflict.
van Boxtel JJ, Koch C., Psychol Sci 23(4), 2012
PMID: 22395132
United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.
Klink PC, van Wezel RJ, van Ee R., Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367(1591), 2012
PMID: 22371615
The effects of categorical and linguistic adaptation on binocular rivalry initial dominance.
Pelekanos V, Roumani D, Moutoussis K., Front Hum Neurosci 5(), 2011
PMID: 22291630
Scene congruency biases Binocular Rivalry.
Mudrik L, Deouell LY, Lamy D., Conscious Cogn 20(3), 2011
PMID: 21306920
On the functional relevance of frontal cortex for passive and voluntarily controlled bistable vision.
de Graaf TA, de Jong MC, Goebel R, van Ee R, van Ee R, Sack AT., Cereb Cortex 21(10), 2011
PMID: 21385836
The role of frontal and parietal brain areas in bistable perception.
Knapen T, Brascamp J, Pearson J, van Ee R, van Ee R, Blake R., J Neurosci 31(28), 2011
PMID: 21753006
Attentional modulation of binocular rivalry.
Paffen CL, Alais D., Front Hum Neurosci 5(), 2011
PMID: 22046156
Increased readiness for adaptation and faster alternation rates under binocular rivalry in children.
Hudak M, Gervan P, Friedrich B, Pastukhov A, Braun J, Kovacs I., Front Hum Neurosci 5(), 2011
PMID: 22069386
High-level binocular rivalry effects.
Wolf M, Hochstein S., Front Hum Neurosci 5(), 2011
PMID: 22144953
Genetic contribution to individual variation in binocular rivalry rate.
Miller SM, Hansell NK, Ngo TT, Liu GB, Pettigrew JD, Martin NG, Wright MJ., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(6), 2010
PMID: 20133779
Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry.
Alais D, van Boxtel JJ, Parker A, van Ee R, van Ee R., Vision Res 50(10), 2010
PMID: 20338191
Disrupting parietal function prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry.
Zaretskaya N, Thielscher A, Logothetis NK, Bartels A., Curr Biol 20(23), 2010
PMID: 21093263
Task usefulness affects perception of rivalrous images.
Chopin A, Mamassian P., Psychol Sci 21(12), 2010
PMID: 21106886
Multistable perception: when bottom-up and top-down coincide.
Kornmeier J, Hein CM, Bach M., Brain Cogn 69(1), 2009
PMID: 18682314
Cueing the interpretation of a Necker Cube: a way to inspect fundamental cognitive processes.
Arrighi R, Arecchi FT, Farini A, Gheri C., Cogn Process 10 Suppl 1(), 2009
PMID: 19048318
Attentional influences on the dynamics of motion-induced blindness.
Schölvinck ML, Rees G., J Vis 9(1), 2009
PMID: 19271908
Intermittent ambiguous stimuli: implicit memory causes periodic perceptual alternations.
Brascamp JW, Pearson J, Blake R, van den Berg AV., J Vis 9(3), 2009
PMID: 19757942
The neural bases of multistable perception.
Sterzer P, Kleinschmidt A, Rees G., Trends Cogn Sci 13(7), 2009
PMID: 19540794
Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection.
van Ee R, van Ee R, van Boxtel JJ, Parker AL, Alais D., J Neurosci 29(37), 2009
PMID: 19759311
Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence.
Wismeijer DA, van Ee R, Erkelens CJ., Exp Brain Res 184(1), 2008
PMID: 17717656
The changing face of perceptual rivalry.
Ngo TT, Liu GB, Tilley AJ, Pettigrew JD, Miller SM., Brain Res Bull 75(5), 2008
PMID: 18355637
Early top-down influences on bistable perception revealed by event-related potentials.
Pitts MA, Gavin WJ, Nerger JL., Brain Cogn 67(1), 2008
PMID: 18155339
Revisiting Wittgenstein on Köhler and Gestalt psychology.
Benjafield JG., J Hist Behav Sci 44(2), 2008
PMID: 18409204
Deciding what to see: the role of intention and attention in the perception of apparent motion.
Kohler A, Haddad L, Singer W, Muckli L., Vision Res 48(8), 2008
PMID: 18279907
The effects of pattern shape, subliminal stimulation, and voluntary control on multistable visual perception.
Taddei-Ferretti C, Radilova J, Musio C, Santillo S, Cibelli E, Cotugno A, Radil T., Brain Res 1225(), 2008
PMID: 18617160
Functional hierarchies of nonconscious visual processing.
Breitmeyer BG, Koç A, Oğmen H, Ziegler R., Vision Res 48(14), 2008
PMID: 18511097
The spatial origin of a perceptual transition in binocular rivalry.
Paffen CL, Naber M, Verstraten FA., PLoS One 3(6), 2008
PMID: 18545647
Influence of emotional facial expressions on binocular rivalry.
Bannerman RL, Milders M, De Gelder B, Sahraie A., Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 28(4), 2008
PMID: 18565087
General validity of Levelt's propositions reveals common computational mechanisms for visual rivalry.
Klink PC, van Ee R, van Ee R, van Wezel RJ., PLoS One 3(10), 2008
PMID: 18941522
Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry.
Kamphuisen AP, van Wezel RJ, van Ee R, van Ee R., Vision Res 47(9), 2007
PMID: 17360017
Plaid motion rivalry: correlates with binocular rivalry and positive mood state.
Sheppard BM, Pettigrew JD., Perception 35(2), 2006
PMID: 16583762
Neural bases of binocular rivalry.
Tong F, Meng M, Blake R., Trends Cogn Sci 10(11), 2006
PMID: 16997612
Voluntarily controlled bi-stable slant perception of real and photographed surfaces.
van Ee R, Krumina G, Pont S, van der Ven S., Proc Biol Sci 272(1559), 2005
PMID: 15695204

101 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Individual and interindividual differences in binocular retinal rivalry in man.
Aafjes M, Hueting JE, Visser P., Psychophysiology 3(1), 1966
PMID: 5942867
The influence of figure-ground relationships in binocular rivalry.
ALEXANDER LT., J Exp Psychol 41(5), 1951
PMID: 14861391
Voluntary control of perception of depth in a two-dimensional drawing
Ammons, Proceedings of the Montana Acadamy of Sciences 19(), 1960
Satiation effects with reversible figures.
Babich S, Standing L., Percept Mot Skills 52(1), 1981
PMID: 7232083
A cross-cultural study of perceptual dominance in binocular rivalry
Bagby, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 54(), 1957
Unilateral neglect and disambiguation of the Necker cube.
Bisiach E, Ricci R, Lai E, De Tanti A, Inzaghi MG., Brain 122 ( Pt 1)(), 1999
PMID: 10050901
Stochastic properties of stabilized-image binocular rivalry alternations.
Blake RR, Fox R, McIntyre C., J Exp Psychol 88(3), 1971
PMID: 5090924
Visual competition.
Blake R, Logothetis N., Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3(1), 2002
PMID: 11823801
On inhibition
Breese, Psychological Monographs 3(), 1899
Attenuating Necker cube depth reversals.
Brigner WL, Deni JR., Percept Mot Skills 74(3 Pt 1), 1992
PMID: 1608720
The neural correlates of bistable stereoscopic depth perception––an fMRI study
Brouwer, Society for NeuroScience (), 2003
A note on the measurement of reversals of perspective
Bruner, Psychometrika 15(), 1950
The stability of binocular rivalry during spaced and massed viewing
Cogan, Perception and Psychophysics 2(), 1967
Rate of apparent change of a Necker cube as a function of prior stimulation
Cohen, American Journal of Psychology 72(), 1959
Perception of reversible figures after brain injury.
COHEN L., AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry 81(6), 1959
PMID: 13649013
Objective measurement of dominance control in binocular rivalry
Collyer, Perception and Psychophysics 8(), 1970
Necker cube perspective dominance as a function of retinal disparity.
Cormack RH, Arger R., Percept Mot Skills 26(2), 1968
PMID: 5654852
Optimal experimental design for event-related fMRI.
Dale AM., Hum Brain Mapp 8(2-3), 1999
PMID: 10524601
The influence of complexity on the fluctuations of the illusions of reversible perspective
Donahue, American Journal of Psychology 43(), 1931
The influence of attention in illusions of reversible perspective
Flügel, British Journal of Psychology 5(), 1913
Personality traits and fluctuations of the outline cube
Frederiksen, American Journal of Psychology 46(), 1934
The significance of the fluctuations experienced in observing ambiguous figures and in binocular rivalry
George, Journal of General Psychology 15(), 1936
Ocular movements in reversibility of perspective
Glen, Journal of General Psychology 23(), 1940
Timing and competition in networks representing ambiguous figures.
Gomez C, Argandona ED, Solier RG, Angulo JC, Vazquez M., Brain Cogn 29(2), 1995
PMID: 8573326

Helmholtz, 1866
Piecemeal organization and cognitive components in object perception: Perceptually coupled responses to moving objects
Hochberg, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116(), 1987
Fluctuation of an ambiguous figure in dementia praecox and in manic-depressive patients
Hunt, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 27(), 1933
Attention and depth perception.
Kawabata N., Perception 15(5), 1986
PMID: 3588216
Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures.
Kleinschmidt A, Buchel C, Zeki S, Frackowiak RS., Proc. Biol. Sci. 265(1413), 1998
PMID: 9921682

The effect of practice on binocular rivalry control
Lack, Perception and Psychophysics 6(), 1969

Lack, 1978
Binocular rivalry is not chaotic.
Lehky SR., Proc. Biol. Sci. 259(1354), 1995
PMID: 7700878
Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception.
Leopold DA, Logothetis NK., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 3(7), 1999
PMID: 10377540
Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns.
Leopold DA, Wilke M, Maier A, Logothetis NK., Nat. Neurosci. 5(6), 2002
PMID: 11992115
Voluntary control of reversible figures.
Liebert RM, Burk B., Percept Mot Skills 61(3 Pt 2), 1985
PMID: 4094876
What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?
Logothetis NK, Leopold DA, Sheinberg DL., Nature 380(6575), 1996
PMID: 8602261
To reverse or not to reverse: when is an ambiguous figure not ambiguous?
Long GM, Olszweski AD., Am J Psychol 112(1), 1999
PMID: 10696278
Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns.
Maier A, Wilke M, Logothetis NK, Leopold DA., Curr. Biol. 13(13), 2003
PMID: 12842006
Physiological factors of the attention process (III)
McDougall, Mind 12(), 1903
Physiological factors of the attention process (IV)
McDougall, Mind 15(), 1906
Effect of instructional conditions on rate of binocular rivalry.
MEREDITH GM, MEREDITH CG., Percept Mot Skills 15(), 1962
PMID: 13934952
The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion.
Nawrot M, Blake R., Percept Psychophys 49(3), 1991
PMID: 2011461
Observations on some remarkable optical phaenomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phenomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometical solid
Necker, London and Edinburgh Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 1(), 1832
Binocular rivalry and visual awareness: the role of attention.
Ooi TL, He ZJ., Perception 28(5), 1999
PMID: 10664754
ORBACH J, EHRLICH D, HEATH HA., Percept Mot Skills 17(), 1963
PMID: 14065532
Dichoptic priming effects on ambiguous picture processing.
Owen LA., Br J Psychol 76 ( Pt 4)(), 1985
PMID: 4075059
Neural activity and its links with the perception of multi-stable figures
Parker, 2003
Acceleration of reversals of a Necker cube.
Pelton LH, Solley CM., Am J Psychol 81(4), 1968
PMID: 5760039
Illusory concomitant motion in ambiguous stereograms: Evidence for nonstimulus contributions to perceptual organization
Peterson, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 12(), 1986
Opposed-set measurement procedure: A quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception
Peterson, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9(), 1983
Searching for the switch: Neural bases for perceptual rivalry alternations
Pettigrew, Brain and Mind 2(), 2001
Diverting subjects' concentration slows figural reversals.
Reisberg D, O'Shaughnessy M., Perception 13(4), 1984
PMID: 6527933
Perception of ambiguous figures after focal brain lesions.
Ricci C, Blundo C., Neuropsychologia 28(11), 1990
PMID: 2290491

Rosenbaum, 1991
Saccades actively maintain perceptual continuity.
Ross J, Ma-Wyatt A., Nat. Neurosci. 7(1), 2003
PMID: 14661023

Competing theories of binocular rivalry: A possible resolution
Tong, Brain Mind 2(), 2001
Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex.
Tong F, Nakayama K, Vaughan JT, Kanwisher N., Neuron 21(4), 1998
PMID: 9808462
Reversible-figure perception: mechanisms of intentional control.
Toppino TC., Percept Psychophys 65(8), 2003
PMID: 14710962
Selective adaptation with reversible figures: don't change that channel.
Toppino TC, Long GM., Percept Psychophys 42(1), 1987
PMID: 3658636
Disambiguating ambiguous figures by selective attention
Tsal, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Experimental Psychology 37(), 1985
Integration of perspective and disparity cues in surface-orientation-selective neurons of area CIP.
Tsutsui K, Jiang M, Yara K, Sakata H, Taira M., J. Neurophysiol. 86(6), 2001
PMID: 11731542
Neural correlates for perception of 3D surface orientation from texture gradient.
Tsutsui K, Sakata H, Naganuma T, Taira M., Science 298(5592), 2002
PMID: 12376700
Voluntary control over perceived dimensionality (perspective) of three-dimensional objects
Ulrich, Proceedings of the Montana Academy of Sciences 19(), 1960
Bistability in stereoscopically perceived slant about a horizontal axis
van, Journal of Vision 3(), 2003

Voluntarily controlled percepts, will-power, and conscious vision
van, Journal of Vision 2(10), 2002
Bayesian modeling of cue interaction: bistability in stereoscopic slant perception.
van Ee R, Adams WJ, Mamassian P., J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 20(7), 2003
PMID: 12868644
Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception.
Van Ee R, Erkelens CJ., Vision Res. 36(1), 1996
PMID: 8746241
Bistable stereoscopic 3D percepts: Will-power, flip frequency, eye movements and blinks
van, Journal of Vision 3(9), 2003

Vernon, 1937
Determination of perspective reversals.
Virsu V., Nature 257(5529), 1975
PMID: 1186857
Binocular rivalry between single lines viewed as real images and afterimages
Wade, Perception and Psychophysics 17(), 1975
Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations
Walker, Perception and Psychophysics 18(), 1975
Studies from the Psychological Laboratory of Vassar College: LXII. Motor factors in voluntary control of cube perspective fluctuations and retinal rivalry fluctuations
Washburn, American Journal of Psychology 45(), 1933
The comparative controllability of the fluctuations of simple and complex ambiguous perspective figures
Washburn, American Journal of Psychology 46(), 1934
Contributions to the physiology of vision––Part the first; on some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision
Wheatstone, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 128(), 1838
Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision.
Wilson HR., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100(24), 2003
PMID: 14612564
Die geometrisch-optischen Tauschungen
Wundt, Abhandlungen der mathematisch-physischen Classe der Koniglich Sachsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 24(), 1898
Do recognizable figures enjoy an advantage in binocular rivalry
Yu, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18(), 1992

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

PMID: 15571737
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar