Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us?

Kristensen FB, Gerhardus A (2010)
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 341(oct22 1): c5236.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
DOI
Autor*in
Kristensen, Finn Borlum; Gerhardus, AnsgarUniBi
Einrichtung
Fakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften
Erscheinungsjahr
2010
Zeitschriftentitel
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Band
341
Ausgabe
oct22 1
Seite(n)
c5236
ISSN
0959-8138
eISSN
1468-5833
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/1929625

Zitieren

Kristensen FB, Gerhardus A. Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us? BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL. 2010;341(oct22 1):c5236.
Kristensen, F. B., & Gerhardus, A. (2010). Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us? BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 341(oct22 1), c5236. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5236
Kristensen, Finn Borlum, and Gerhardus, Ansgar. 2010. “Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us?”. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 341 (oct22 1): c5236.
Kristensen, F. B., and Gerhardus, A. (2010). Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us? BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 341, c5236.
Kristensen, F.B., & Gerhardus, A., 2010. Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us? BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 341(oct22 1), p c5236.
F.B. Kristensen and A. Gerhardus, “Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us?”, BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 341, 2010, pp. c5236.
Kristensen, F.B., Gerhardus, A.: Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us? BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL. 341, c5236 (2010).
Kristensen, Finn Borlum, and Gerhardus, Ansgar. “Health technology assessments: what do differing conclusions tell us?”. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL 341.oct22 1 (2010): c5236.

6 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

HTA Implementation Roadmap in Central and Eastern European Countries.
Kaló Z, Gheorghe A, Huic M, Csanádi M, Kristensen FB., Health Econ 25 Suppl 1(), 2016
PMID: 26763688
Can a Joint Assessment Provide Relevant Information for National/Local Relative Effectiveness Assessments? An In-Depth Comparison of Pazopanib Assessments.
Kleijnen S, Fathallah M, van der Linden MW, Vancraeynest P, Dahmani B, Timoney A, De Boer A, Leufkens HG, Goettsch WG., Value Health 18(5), 2015
PMID: 26297095
Responsibility and accountability for well informed health-care decisions: a global challenge.
Jamtvedt G, Klemp M, Mørland B, Nylenna M., Lancet 386(9995), 2015
PMID: 26085031
Collaboration in health technology assessment (EUnetHTA joint action, 2010-2012): four case studies.
Huić M, Nachtnebel A, Zechmeister I, Pasternak I, Wild C., Int J Technol Assess Health Care 29(3), 2013
PMID: 23759333
Engaging with economic evaluation methods: insights from small and medium enterprises in the UK medical devices industry after training workshops.
Craven MP, Allsop MJ, Morgan SP, Martin JL., Health Res Policy Syst 10(), 2012
PMID: 22943625
[Do media reports and public brochures facilitate informed decision making about cervical cancer prevention?].
Neumeyer-Gromen A, Bodemer N, Müller SM, Gigerenzer G., Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 54(11), 2011
PMID: 22015792
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 20971784
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar