Are social desirability scales useful to identify subjects who respond in a socially desirable way?
Borkenau P, Ostendorf F (1995)
European Journal of Psychological Assessment 11(S1): 23.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Borkenau, Peter;
Ostendorf, FritzUniBi 
Erscheinungsjahr
1995
Zeitschriftentitel
European Journal of Psychological Assessment
Band
11
Ausgabe
S1
Seite(n)
23
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/1902841
Zitieren
Borkenau P, Ostendorf F. Are social desirability scales useful to identify subjects who respond in a socially desirable way? European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 1995;11(S1):23.
Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1995). Are social desirability scales useful to identify subjects who respond in a socially desirable way? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11(S1), 23.
Borkenau, Peter, and Ostendorf, Fritz. 1995. “Are social desirability scales useful to identify subjects who respond in a socially desirable way?”. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 11 (S1): 23.
Borkenau, P., and Ostendorf, F. (1995). Are social desirability scales useful to identify subjects who respond in a socially desirable way? European Journal of Psychological Assessment 11, 23.
Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F., 1995. Are social desirability scales useful to identify subjects who respond in a socially desirable way? European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 11(S1), p 23.
P. Borkenau and F. Ostendorf, “Are social desirability scales useful to identify subjects who respond in a socially desirable way?”, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, vol. 11, 1995, pp. 23.
Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F.: Are social desirability scales useful to identify subjects who respond in a socially desirable way? European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 11, 23 (1995).
Borkenau, Peter, and Ostendorf, Fritz. “Are social desirability scales useful to identify subjects who respond in a socially desirable way?”. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 11.S1 (1995): 23.
Google Scholar