Decentralized planning for multiobjective resource allocation and project selection
Stummer C, Vetschera R (2003)
Central European Journal of Operations Research 11(3): 253-279.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Stummer, ChristianUniBi 
;
Vetschera, Rudolf
;
Vetschera, RudolfEinrichtung
Erscheinungsjahr
2003
Zeitschriftentitel
Central European Journal of Operations Research
Band
11
Ausgabe
3
Seite(n)
253-279
ISSN
1435-246X
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/1901079
Zitieren
Stummer C, Vetschera R. Decentralized planning for multiobjective resource allocation and project selection. Central European Journal of Operations Research. 2003;11(3):253-279.
Stummer, C., & Vetschera, R. (2003). Decentralized planning for multiobjective resource allocation and project selection. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 11(3), 253-279.
Stummer, Christian, and Vetschera, Rudolf. 2003. “Decentralized planning for multiobjective resource allocation and project selection”. Central European Journal of Operations Research 11 (3): 253-279.
Stummer, C., and Vetschera, R. (2003). Decentralized planning for multiobjective resource allocation and project selection. Central European Journal of Operations Research 11, 253-279.
Stummer, C., & Vetschera, R., 2003. Decentralized planning for multiobjective resource allocation and project selection. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 11(3), p 253-279.
C. Stummer and R. Vetschera, “Decentralized planning for multiobjective resource allocation and project selection”, Central European Journal of Operations Research, vol. 11, 2003, pp. 253-279.
Stummer, C., Vetschera, R.: Decentralized planning for multiobjective resource allocation and project selection. Central European Journal of Operations Research. 11, 253-279 (2003).
Stummer, Christian, and Vetschera, Rudolf. “Decentralized planning for multiobjective resource allocation and project selection”. Central European Journal of Operations Research 11.3 (2003): 253-279.
Google Scholar