Unitary social science for causal understanding? Experiences and prospects of life course research
Diewald M (2001)
Canadian Studies in Population 28(2 (Special issue on Longitudinal Research): 219-248.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Erscheinungsjahr
2001
Zeitschriftentitel
Canadian Studies in Population
Band
28
Ausgabe
2 (Special issue on Longitudinal Research)
Seite(n)
219-248
ISSN
0380-1489
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/1863248
Zitieren
Diewald M. Unitary social science for causal understanding? Experiences and prospects of life course research. Canadian Studies in Population. 2001;28(2 (Special issue on Longitudinal Research):219-248.
Diewald, M. (2001). Unitary social science for causal understanding? Experiences and prospects of life course research. Canadian Studies in Population, 28(2 (Special issue on Longitudinal Research), 219-248.
Diewald, Martin. 2001. “Unitary social science for causal understanding? Experiences and prospects of life course research”. Canadian Studies in Population 28 (2 (Special issue on Longitudinal Research): 219-248.
Diewald, M. (2001). Unitary social science for causal understanding? Experiences and prospects of life course research. Canadian Studies in Population 28, 219-248.
Diewald, M., 2001. Unitary social science for causal understanding? Experiences and prospects of life course research. Canadian Studies in Population, 28(2 (Special issue on Longitudinal Research), p 219-248.
M. Diewald, “Unitary social science for causal understanding? Experiences and prospects of life course research”, Canadian Studies in Population, vol. 28, 2001, pp. 219-248.
Diewald, M.: Unitary social science for causal understanding? Experiences and prospects of life course research. Canadian Studies in Population. 28, 219-248 (2001).
Diewald, Martin. “Unitary social science for causal understanding? Experiences and prospects of life course research”. Canadian Studies in Population 28.2 (Special issue on Longitudinal Research) (2001): 219-248.
Google Scholar