Heuristic methods for cost-oriented assembly line balancing: A comparison on solution quality and computing time
Amen M (2001)
International Journal of Production Economics 69(3): 255-264.
Zeitschriftenaufsatz
| Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor*in
Einrichtung
Erscheinungsjahr
2001
Zeitschriftentitel
International Journal of Production Economics
Band
69
Ausgabe
3
Seite(n)
255-264
ISSN
0925-5273
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/1858806
Zitieren
Amen M. Heuristic methods for cost-oriented assembly line balancing: A comparison on solution quality and computing time. International Journal of Production Economics. 2001;69(3):255-264.
Amen, M. (2001). Heuristic methods for cost-oriented assembly line balancing: A comparison on solution quality and computing time. International Journal of Production Economics, 69(3), 255-264.
Amen, Matthias. 2001. “Heuristic methods for cost-oriented assembly line balancing: A comparison on solution quality and computing time”. International Journal of Production Economics 69 (3): 255-264.
Amen, M. (2001). Heuristic methods for cost-oriented assembly line balancing: A comparison on solution quality and computing time. International Journal of Production Economics 69, 255-264.
Amen, M., 2001. Heuristic methods for cost-oriented assembly line balancing: A comparison on solution quality and computing time. International Journal of Production Economics, 69(3), p 255-264.
M. Amen, “Heuristic methods for cost-oriented assembly line balancing: A comparison on solution quality and computing time”, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 69, 2001, pp. 255-264.
Amen, M.: Heuristic methods for cost-oriented assembly line balancing: A comparison on solution quality and computing time. International Journal of Production Economics. 69, 255-264 (2001).
Amen, Matthias. “Heuristic methods for cost-oriented assembly line balancing: A comparison on solution quality and computing time”. International Journal of Production Economics 69.3 (2001): 255-264.
Google Scholar