Indirect benefits for choosy female grasshoppers (Chorthippus biguttulus)?

Klappert K, Reinhold K (2007)
ZOOLOGY 110(5): 354-359.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Klappert, Kirsten; Reinhold, KlausUniBi
Abstract / Bemerkung
Since direct benefits are likely to be absent in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus, indirect genetic benefits are a potential explanation for costly female preference. Choosy females may improve their fitness in terms of enhanced attractiveness of sons alone or additionally by improved viability of offspring. We tested the predictions of these two hypotheses by comparing attractiveness-related song traits and viability in offspring of attractive and unattractive grasshopper males. The experiment was conducted with larvae reared under semi natural lab conditions in one year and under natural conditions in the field in the following year. If reared under natural conditions no significant differences in viability and song traits between offspring of attractive and unattractive males could be found. Offspring reared in the lab produced calling songs with a significantly more exact song rhythm when sired by attractive males than offspring of unattractive males. Offspring of attractive males should thus have a theoretical advantage in mate choice, which, however, did not translate into higher attractiveness values in acoustic female choice experiments. Therefore our experiments could not resolve whether female choice in C biguttulus evolved according to the sexy son hypothesis. Since viability in offspring of attractive males did not differ from offspring of unattractive males, "good genes" seems unlikely to be the underlying mechanism of female choice. (C) 2007 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
sexual selection; attractiveness; good genes; hypothesis; sexy son; mate choice
Page URI


Klappert K, Reinhold K. Indirect benefits for choosy female grasshoppers (Chorthippus biguttulus)? ZOOLOGY. 2007;110(5):354-359.
Klappert, K., & Reinhold, K. (2007). Indirect benefits for choosy female grasshoppers (Chorthippus biguttulus)? ZOOLOGY, 110(5), 354-359.
Klappert, K., and Reinhold, K. (2007). Indirect benefits for choosy female grasshoppers (Chorthippus biguttulus)? ZOOLOGY 110, 354-359.
Klappert, K., & Reinhold, K., 2007. Indirect benefits for choosy female grasshoppers (Chorthippus biguttulus)? ZOOLOGY, 110(5), p 354-359.
K. Klappert and K. Reinhold, “Indirect benefits for choosy female grasshoppers (Chorthippus biguttulus)?”, ZOOLOGY, vol. 110, 2007, pp. 354-359.
Klappert, K., Reinhold, K.: Indirect benefits for choosy female grasshoppers (Chorthippus biguttulus)? ZOOLOGY. 110, 354-359 (2007).
Klappert, Kirsten, and Reinhold, Klaus. “Indirect benefits for choosy female grasshoppers (Chorthippus biguttulus)?”. ZOOLOGY 110.5 (2007): 354-359.

3 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Chemical cues from females trigger male courtship behaviour in grasshoppers.
Finck J, Kuntze J, Ronacher B., J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 202(5), 2016
PMID: 27025933
Grasshopper calling songs convey information about condition and health of males.
Stange N, Ronacher B., J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 198(4), 2012
PMID: 22246210
Reducing mutation load through sexual selection on males.
McGuigan K, Petfield D, Blows MW., Evolution 65(10), 2011
PMID: 21967424

29 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Andersson, 1994
Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks
Bakker, Nature 363(), 1993
Butlin RK, Woodhatch CW, Hewitt GM., Evolution 41(1), 1987
PMID: 28563749
Testing genetic models of mate choice evolution in the wild.
Charmantier A, Sheldon BC., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 21(8), 2006
PMID: 16782227
Sire attractiveness influences offspring performance in guppies.
Evans JP, Kelley JL, Bisazza A, Finazzo E, Pilastro A., Proc. Biol. Sci. 271(1552), 2004
PMID: 15451693
A novel song parameter correlates with extra-pair paternity and reflects male longevity.
Forstmeier W, Kempenaers B, Meyer A, Leisler B., Proc. Biol. Sci. 269(1499), 2002
PMID: 12137578
Sexual selection in natural populations of seaweed flies: variation in the offspring fitness of females carrying different inversion karyotypes
Gilburn, Proc. Roy. Soc. London B 263(), 1996
The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs.
Head ML, Hunt J, Jennions MD, Brooks R., PLoS Biol. 3(2), 2005
PMID: 15678167
Signals for survival in the lives of crickets
Hoy, Am. Zool. 31(), 1991
Heritability of body mass, a sexually selected trait, in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix).
Iyengar VK, Eisner T., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96(16), 1999
PMID: 10430914
Female bluethroats enhance offspring immunocompetence through extra-pair copulations.
Johnsen A, Andersen V, Sunding C, Lifjeld JT., Nature 406(6793), 2000
PMID: 10917529
Fisherian flies: benefits of female choice in a lekking sandfly.
Jones TM, Quinnell RJ, Balmford A., Proc. Biol. Sci. 265(1406), 1998
PMID: PMC1689344
Acoustic preference functions and sexual selection on the male calling song in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus
Klappert, Anim. Behav. 65(), 2002
Local adaptation and sexual selection: a reciprocal transfer experiment with the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus
Klappert, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58(), 2005
Sexual signalling and viability in a wolf spider (Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata): measurements under laboratory and field conditions
Kotiaho, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46(), 1999
Influence of male songs on female mating behavior in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus (Orthoptera: Acrididae)
Kriegbaum, Ethology 91(), 1992
Females of the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus (Zett.) do not remate for fresh sperm.
Reinhardt K, hler GK, Schumacher J., Proc. Biol. Sci. 266(1432), 1999
PMID: PMC1690304
Extra-pair paternity in relation to male age in Bullock's orioles
Richardson DS, Burke T., Mol. Ecol. 8(12), 1999
PMID: 10632862
An experimental test for indirect benefits in Drosophila melanogaster.
Rundle HD, Odeen A, Mooers AO., BMC Evol. Biol. 7(), 2007
PMID: 17349042
Species recognition influences female mate preferences in the common European grasshopper (Chorthippus biguttulus Linnaeus, 1758)
Safi, Ethology 112(), 2006
Experimentally reduced male attractiveness increases parental care in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca
Sanz, Behav. Ecol. 12(), 2001
Long-term fitness consequences of female extra-pair matings in a socially monogamous passerine.
Schmoll T, Dietrich V, Winkel W, Epplen JT, Lubjuhn T., Proc. Biol. Sci. 270(1512), 2003
PMID: 12614574
Seasonal variation in female response to male calling song in the field cricket, Gryllus rubens
Velez, Ethology 112(), 2006
Acoustic pattern recognition in a grasshopper: processing in the time or frequency domain?
von, Biol. Cyb. 79(), 1998
Successful fathers sire successful sons.
Wedell N, Tregenza T., Evolution 53(2), 1999
PMID: IND22000793
Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs.
Welch AM, Semlitsch RD, Gerhardt HC., Science 280(5371), 1998
PMID: 9632389


Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®


PMID: 17720463
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar