On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples

Piedmont RL, McCrae RR, Riemann R, Angleitner A (2000)
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 78(3): 582-593.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
DOI
Autor*in
Piedmont, RL; McCrae, RR; Riemann, RainerUniBi ; Angleitner, AloisUniBi
Einrichtung
Fakultät für Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft > Abteilung für Psychologie
Abstract / Bemerkung
Because of the potential for bias and error in questionnaire responding, many personality inventories include validity scales intended to correct biased scores or identify invalid protocols. The authors evaluated the utility of several types of validity scales in a volunteer sample of 72 men and 106 women who completed the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R; P. T. Costa Be R. R. McCrae, 1992) and the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ; A. Tellegen, 1978/1982) and were rated by 2 acquaintances on the observer form of the NEO-PI-R. Analyses indicated that the validity indexes lacked utility in this sample. A partial replication (N = 1,728) also failed to find consistent support for the use of validity scales. The authors illustrate the use of informant ratings in assessing protocol validity and argue that psychological assessors should limit their use of validity scales and seek instead to improve the quality of personality assessments.
Erscheinungsjahr
2000
Zeitschriftentitel
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Band
78
Ausgabe
3
Seite(n)
582-593
ISSN
0022-3514
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/1619720

Zitieren

Piedmont RL, McCrae RR, Riemann R, Angleitner A. On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. 2000;78(3):582-593.
Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2000). On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 78(3), 582-593. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.582
Piedmont, RL, McCrae, RR, Riemann, Rainer, and Angleitner, Alois. 2000. “On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples”. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 78 (3): 582-593.
Piedmont, R. L., McCrae, R. R., Riemann, R., and Angleitner, A. (2000). On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 78, 582-593.
Piedmont, R.L., et al., 2000. On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 78(3), p 582-593.
R.L. Piedmont, et al., “On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples”, JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 78, 2000, pp. 582-593.
Piedmont, R.L., McCrae, R.R., Riemann, R., Angleitner, A.: On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. 78, 582-593 (2000).
Piedmont, RL, McCrae, RR, Riemann, Rainer, and Angleitner, Alois. “On the invalidity of validity scales: Evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples”. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 78.3 (2000): 582-593.

49 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Source method biases as implicit personality theory at the domain and facet levels.
McCrae RR, Mõttus R, Hřebíčková M, Realo A, Allik J., J Pers 87(4), 2019
PMID: 30244473
Careless responding in internet-based quality of life assessments.
Schneider S, May M, Stone AA., Qual Life Res 27(4), 2018
PMID: 29248996
Does the Convergent Validity of the PAI Antisocial Features Scale Depend on Offender Response Style?
Gardner BO, Boccaccini MT., J Pers Assess 99(5), 2017
PMID: 28375716
A Meta-Analytic Multitrait Multirater Separation of Substance and Style in Social Desirability Scales.
Connelly BS, Chang L., J Pers 84(3), 2016
PMID: 25565409
Quantifying the Association of Self-Enhancement Bias With Self-Ratings of Personality and Life Satisfaction.
Leising D, Locke KD, Kurzius E, Zimmermann J., Assessment 23(5), 2016
PMID: 26092044
Unfaithful findings: identifying careless responding in addictions research.
Godinho A, Kushnir V, Cunningham JA., Addiction 111(6), 2016
PMID: 26662631
Agreement Between Self- and Informant-Reported Ratings of Personality Traits: The Moderating Effects of Major Depressive and/or Panic Disorder.
Lieberman L, Gorka SM, Huggins AA, Katz AC, Sarapas C, Shankman SA., J Nerv Ment Dis 204(4), 2016
PMID: 26658660
Syndromes of collateral-reported psychopathology for ages 18-59 in 18 Societies.
Ivanova MY, Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA, Turner LV, Árnadóttir HA, Au A, Caldas JC, Chaalal N, Chen YC, da Rocha MM, Decoster J, Fontaine JRJ, Funabiki Y, Guðmundsson HS, Kim YA, Leung P, Liu J, Malykh S, Marković J, Oh KJ, Petot JM, Samaniego VC, Silvares EFM, Šimulionienė R, Šobot V, Sokoli E, Sun G, Talcott JB, Vázquez N, Zasępa E., Int J Clin Health Psychol 15(1), 2015
PMID: 29399019
The value of suppressor effects in explicating the construct validity of symptom measures.
Watson D, Clark LA, Chmielewski M, Kotov R., Psychol Assess 25(3), 2013
PMID: 23795886
Convergent validity of MCMI-III clinical syndrome scales.
Hesse M, Guldager S, Linneberg IH., Br J Clin Psychol 51(2), 2012
PMID: 22574802
Longitudinal intergroup contact effects on prejudice using self- and observer-reports.
Dhont K, Van Hiel A, De Bolle M, Roets A., Br J Soc Psychol 51(2), 2012
PMID: 21749415
The inconsistency of inconsistency scales: a comparison of two widely used measures.
Nikolova NL, Hendry MC, Douglas KS, Edens JF, Lilienfeld SO., Behav Sci Law 30(1), 2012
PMID: 22298127
Epidemiological evidence for the bimodal chronotype using the Composite Scale of Morningness.
Randler C, Vollmer C., Chronobiol Int 29(1), 2012
PMID: 22217095
Applicant reactions and faking in real-life personnel selection.
Honkaniemi L, Tolvanen A, Feldt T., Scand J Psychol 52(4), 2011
PMID: 21752026
Sources of variance in personality facets: a multiple-rater twin study of self-peer, peer-peer, and self-self (dis)agreement.
Kandler C, Riemann R, Spinath FM, Angleitner A., J Pers 78(5), 2010
PMID: 20663023
More may be better but there may be too much: optimal trait level and self-enhancement bias.
Borkenau P, Zaltauskas K, Leising D., J Pers 77(3), 2009
PMID: 20078739
Ethnicity, Education, and the Temporal Stability of Personality Traits In the East Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study.
Löckenhoff CE, Terracciano A, Bienvenu OJ, Patriciu NS, Nestadt G, McCrae RR, Eaton WW, Costa PT., J Res Pers 42(3), 2008
PMID: 19122849
Personality of young adults born prematurely: the Helsinki study of very low birth weight adults.
Pesonen AK, Räikkönen K, Heinonen K, Andersson S, Hovi P, Järvenpää AL, Eriksson JG, Kajantie E., J Child Psychol Psychiatry 49(6), 2008
PMID: 18341548
Detection of aberrant responding on a personality scale in a military sample: an application of evaluating person fit with two-level logistic regression.
Woods CM, Oltmanns TF, Turkheimer E., Psychol Assess 20(2), 2008
PMID: 18557693
Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five.
McCrae RR, Yamagata S, Jang KL, Riemann R, Ando J, Ono Y, Angleitner A, Spinath FM., J Pers Soc Psychol 95(2), 2008
PMID: 18665712
Do humans prefer altruistic mates? Testing a link between sexual selection and altruism towards non-relatives.
Phillips T, Barnard C, Ferguson E, Reader T., Br J Psychol 99(pt 4), 2008
PMID: 18817596
Personality traits in Sardinia: testing founder population effects on trait means and variances.
Costa PT, Terracciano A, Uda M, Vacca L, Mameli C, Pilia G, Zonderman AB, Lakatta E, Schlessinger D, McCrae RR., Behav Genet 37(2), 2007
PMID: 16972192
Substance and style in socially desirable responding.
Lönnqvist JE, Paunonen S, Tuulio-Henriksson A, Lönnqvist J, Verkasalo M., J Pers 75(2), 2007
PMID: 17359240
Cross-sectional age differences and longitudinal age changes of personality in middle adulthood and old age.
Allemand M, Zimprich D, Hertzog C., J Pers 75(2), 2007
PMID: 17359241
Growth-mortality tradeoffs and 'personality traits' in animals.
Stamps JA., Ecol Lett 10(5), 2007
PMID: 17498134
Relationships matter in personality development: evidence from an 8-year longitudinal study across young adulthood.
Neyer FJ, Lehnart J., J Pers 75(3), 2007
PMID: 17489891
Situation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior.
Fleeson W., J Pers 75(4), 2007
PMID: 17576360
Temperament and developmental psychopathology.
Nigg JT., J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47(3-4), 2006
PMID: 16492265
Integration of multidimensional self-concept and core personality constructs: construct validation and relations to well-being and achievement.
Marsh HW, Trautwein U, Lüdtke O, Köller O, Baumert J., J Pers 74(2), 2006
PMID: 16529582
Generativity and successful parenting: an analysis of young adult outcomes.
Peterson BE., J Pers 74(3), 2006
PMID: 16684255
Self-liking and self-competence separate self-evaluation from self-deception: associations with personality, ability, and achievement.
Mar RA, DeYoung CG, Higgins DM, Peterson JB., J Pers 74(4), 2006
PMID: 16787428
Basic personality dispositions, self-esteem, and personal goals: an approach-avoidance analysis.
Heimpel SA, Elliot AJ, Wood JV., J Pers 74(5), 2006
PMID: 16958703
Putting the five-factor model into context: evidence linking big five traits to narrative identity.
Raggatt P., J Pers 74(5), 2006
PMID: 16958704
Psychiatric patient and informant reports of patient behavior.
Ready RE, Clark LA., J Pers 73(1), 2005
PMID: 15660671
Searching for a developmental typology of personality and its relations to antisocial behavior: a longitudinal study of a representative sample of men.
Morizot J, Le Blanc M., J Pers 73(1), 2005
PMID: 15660676
A chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) analogue of cross-national generalization of personality structure: zoological parks and an African sanctuary.
King JE, Weiss A, Farmer KH., J Pers 73(2), 2005
PMID: 15745435
Do people know how their personality has changed? Correlates of perceived and actual personality change in young adulthood.
Robins RW, Noftle EE, Trzesniewski KH, Roberts BW., J Pers 73(2), 2005
PMID: 15745439
Personality stability in late adulthood: a behavioral genetic analysis.
Johnson W, McGue M, Krueger RF., J Pers 73(2), 2005
PMID: 15745440
Assessment of adult psychopathology: meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant correlations.
Achenbach TM, Krukowski RA, Dumenci L, Ivanova MY., Psychol Bull 131(3), 2005
PMID: 15869333
Personality dimensions across cultures.
Allik J., J Pers Disord 19(3), 2005
PMID: 16175734
Conceptual complexity and construct validity.
McGrath RE., J Pers Assess 85(2), 2005
PMID: 16171410
Personality differences in childhood and adolescence: measurement, development, and consequences.
Shiner R, Caspi A., J Child Psychol Psychiatry 44(1), 2003
PMID: 12553411
Comparing continuous and dichotomous scoring of the balanced inventory of desirable responding.
Stöber J, Dette DE, Musch J., J Pers Assess 78(2), 2002
PMID: 12067199
Response styles in affect ratings: making a mountain out of a molehill.
Schimmack U, Böckenholt U, Reisenzein R., J Pers Assess 78(3), 2002
PMID: 12146815
Elisions in the field of caring.
Deary V, Deary IJ, McKenna HP, McCance TV, Watson R, Hoogbruin AL., J Adv Nurs 39(1), 2002
PMID: 12074756
The Marlowe-Crowne affair: short forms, psychometric structure, and social desirability.
Barger SD., J Pers Assess 79(2), 2002
PMID: 12425392
Substance or style? An investigation of the NEO-PI-R validity scales.
Morey LC, Quigley BD, Sanislow CA, Skodol AE, McGlashan TH, Shea MT, Stout RL, Zanarini MC, Gunderson JG., J Pers Assess 79(3), 2002
PMID: 12511022
Semantic response consistency and protocol validity in structured personality assessment: the case of the NEO-PI-R.
Kurtz JE, Parrish CL., J Pers Assess 76(2), 2001
PMID: 11393463
Effectiveness of NEO-PI-R research validity scales for discriminating analog malingering and genuine psychopathology.
Berry DT, Bagby RM, Smerz J, Rinaldo JC, Caldwell-Andrews A, Baer RA., J Pers Assess 76(3), 2001
PMID: 11499461
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 10743882
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar