Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag?

Dimitrov D, Haake C-J (2006)
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 89(2): 115-128.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Autor/in
;
Abstract / Bemerkung
We model the process of coalition formation in the 16th German Bundestag as a hedonic coalition formation game. In order to induce players' preferences in the game we apply the Shapley value of the simple game describing all winning coalitions in the Bundestag. Using different stability notions for hedonic games we prove that the ``most'' stable government is formed by the Union Parties together with the Social Democratic Party.
Stichworte
simple games; Shapley value; coalition formation; winning coalitions
Erscheinungsjahr
2006
Zeitschriftentitel
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS
Band
89
Ausgabe
2
Seite(n)
115-128
ISSN
0931-8658
eISSN
1617-7134
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/1597077

Zitieren

Dimitrov D, Haake C-J. Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag? JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS. 2006;89(2):115-128.
Dimitrov, D., & Haake, C. - J. (2006). Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag? JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 89(2), 115-128. doi:10.1007/s00712-006-0207-5
Dimitrov, D., and Haake, C. - J. (2006). Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag? JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 89, 115-128.
Dimitrov, D., & Haake, C.-J., 2006. Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag? JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 89(2), p 115-128.
D. Dimitrov and C.-J. Haake, “Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag?”, JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, vol. 89, 2006, pp. 115-128.
Dimitrov, D., Haake, C.-J.: Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag? JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS. 89, 115-128 (2006).
Dimitrov, Dinko, and Haake, Claus-Jochen. “Government versus opposition: Who should be who in the 16th German Bundestag?”. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS 89.2 (2006): 115-128.