Folivory versus florivory-adaptiveness of flower feeding

Bandeili B, Müller C (2010)

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Bandeili, Babak; Müller, CarolineUniBi
Abstract / Bemerkung
The distribution of resources and defence is heterogeneous within plants. Specialist insects may prefer tissue with high concentrations of the plant's characteristic defence compounds. Most herbivorous butterfly or sawfly larvae are considered to be folivores, so also the turnip sawfly Athalia rosae (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae), a specialist herbivore on Brassicaceae. We investigated which tissue larvae choose to feed upon and how they perform on flowers, young or old leaves of Sinapis alba. Furthermore, constitutive and inducible levels of glucosinolates and myrosinases were investigated and nutrients analysed. Larvae moved from leaves to flowers for feeding from the third larval instar on. Flowers were not actively chosen, but larvae moved upwards on the plant, regardless of how plants were orientated (upright or inverted). Flower-feeding larvae were heavier and developed faster than larvae feeding on young leaves, and adults laid more eggs. Old leaves as food source resulted in the lowest growth rates. Flowers contained three and ten times higher myrosinase activities than young and old leaves, respectively, whereas glucosinolate concentrations and nitrogen levels of flowers and young leaves were comparable. Glucosinolate concentrations of old leaves were very low. Changes in tissue chemistry caused by larval feeding were tissue specific. Defence levels did not change in flowers and old leaves after A. rosae feeding in contrast to young leaves. The high insect performance on flowers cannot be explained by differences in chemical defence. Instead, the lack of mechanical defence (trichomes) is probably responsible. Movement to the flowers and folivory is overall highly adaptive for this sawfly species.
Florivory; Performance; Myrosinase; Glucosinolate; Brassicaceae; Specialist
Page URI


Bandeili B, Müller C. Folivory versus florivory-adaptiveness of flower feeding. NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN. 2010;97(1):79-88.
Bandeili, B., & Müller, C. (2010). Folivory versus florivory-adaptiveness of flower feeding. NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, 97(1), 79-88.
Bandeili, Babak, and Müller, Caroline. 2010. “Folivory versus florivory-adaptiveness of flower feeding”. NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN 97 (1): 79-88.
Bandeili, B., and Müller, C. (2010). Folivory versus florivory-adaptiveness of flower feeding. NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN 97, 79-88.
Bandeili, B., & Müller, C., 2010. Folivory versus florivory-adaptiveness of flower feeding. NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, 97(1), p 79-88.
B. Bandeili and C. Müller, “Folivory versus florivory-adaptiveness of flower feeding”, NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, vol. 97, 2010, pp. 79-88.
Bandeili, B., Müller, C.: Folivory versus florivory-adaptiveness of flower feeding. NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN. 97, 79-88 (2010).
Bandeili, Babak, and Müller, Caroline. “Folivory versus florivory-adaptiveness of flower feeding”. NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN 97.1 (2010): 79-88.

9 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

A Hierarchy of Cues Directs the Foraging of Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) Larvae.
Tsuji J, Logan T, Russo A., Environ Entomol 47(6), 2018
PMID: 30165377
Seasonal importance of flowers to Costa Rican capuchins (Cebus capucinus imitator): Implications for plant and primate.
Hogan JD, Melin AD, Mosdossy KN, Fedigan LM., Am J Phys Anthropol 161(4), 2016
PMID: 27492752
Uncovering different parameters influencing florivory in a specialist herbivore
ABDALSAMEE MK, MÜLLER C., Ecol Entomol 40(3), 2015
PMID: IND601326117
Caught between parasitoids and predators - survival of a specialist herbivore on leaves and flowers of mustard plants.
Lucas-Barbosa D, Poelman EH, Aartsma Y, Snoeren TA, van Loon JJ, Dicke M., J Chem Ecol 40(6), 2014
PMID: 24888744

42 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

AM, Chemoecology 16(), 2006

B, J Chem Ecol 23(), 1997
Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates.
Halkier BA, Gershenzon J., Annu Rev Plant Biol 57(), 2006
PMID: 16669764

T, Top Curr Chem 209(), 2000

RJ, J Chem Ecol 24(), 1998

CW, Environ Entomol 16(), 1987

P, Basic Appl Ecol 9(), 2008

PW, Agric Ecosyst Environ 97(), 2003

Q, J Chem Ecol 26(), 2000

H, Abh Larv Syst Ins 1(), 1957

N, Basic Appl Ecol 8(), 2007
Florivory: the intersection of pollination and herbivory.
McCall AC, Irwin RE., Ecol. Lett. 9(12), 2006
PMID: 17118009

D, 1979

C, Phytochem Rev 8(), 2009

C, Chemoecology 16(), 2006
Uptake and turn-over of glucosinolates sequestered in the sawfly Athalia rosae.
Muller C, Wittstock U., Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 35(10), 2005
PMID: 16102424
Sequestration of host plant glucosinolates in the defensive hemolymph of the sawfly Athalia rosae.
Muller C, Agerbirk N, Olsen CE, Boeve JL, Schaffner U, Brakefield PM., J. Chem. Ecol. 27(12), 2001
PMID: 11789955
Host plant derived feeding deterrence towards ants in the turnip sawfly Athalia rosae
Muller C, Boeve J, Brakefield PM., Entomol. Exp. Appl. 104(1), 2002
PMID: IND23321180

B, Anzeiger Schädlingskund 52(), 1979

SEW, Chemoecology 19(), 2009

MS, New Phytol 60(), 1961

LE, Arthr-Plant Interact 2(), 2008

LE, Arthr-Plant Interact 3(), 2009

R, Nachrbl Dtsch Pflanzenschutzd (Berlin) 15(), 1961

E, Z ang Entomol 26(), 1939

LM, 2006
Flower vs. leaf feeding by Pieris brassicae: glucosinolate-rich flower tissues are preferred and sustain higher growth rate.
Smallegange RC, van Loon JJ, Blatt SE, Harvey JA, Agerbirk N, Dicke M., J. Chem. Ecol. 33(10), 2007
PMID: 17828429

E, Phytochem Rev 8(), 2009

JLM, J Insect Behav 10(), 1997
Optimal defence theory and flower petal colour predict variation in the secondary chemistry of wild radish
Strauss SY, Rebecca E. Irwin , Virginia M. Lambrix ., J. Ecol. 92(1), 2004
PMID: IND43650032


S, Phytochem Rev 8(), 2009

N, Funct Ecol 22(), 2008
Specificity of induction responses in Sinapis alba L.: Plant growth and development.
Travers-Martin N, Muller C., Plant Signal Behav 3(5), 2008
PMID: 19841655
Revised determination of free and complexed myrosinase activities in plant extracts.
Travers-Martin N, Kuhlmann F, Muller C., Plant Physiol. Biochem. 46(4), 2008
PMID: 18395461
Factors affecting the glucosinolate content of kale (Brassica oleracea acephala group).
Velasco P, Cartea ME, Gonzalez C, Vilar M, Ordas A., J. Agric. Food Chem. 55(3), 2007
PMID: 17263499

U, 2003

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

PMID: 19826770
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar