Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five

McCrae RR, Yamagata S, Jang KL, Riemann R, Ando J, Ono Y, Angleitner A, Spinath FM (2008)
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 95(2): 442-455.

Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
 
Download
Es wurden keine Dateien hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
DOI
Autor*in
McCrae, Robert R.; Yamagata, Shinji; Jang, Kerry L.; Riemann, RainerUniBi ; Ando, Juko; Ono, Yutaka; Angleitner, AloisUniBi; Spinath, Frank M.
Einrichtung
Fakultät für Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft > Abteilung für Psychologie
Abstract / Bemerkung
J. M. Digman (1997) proposed that the Big Five personality traits showed a higher-order structure with 2 factors he labeled alpha and beta. These factors have been alternatively interpreted as heritable components of personality or as artifacts of evaluative bias. Using structural equation modeling, the authors reanalyzed data from a cross-national twin study and from American cross-observer studies and analyzed new multimethod data from a German twin study. In all analyses, artifact models outperformed substance models by root-mean-square error of approximation criteria, but models combining both artifact and substance were slightly better. These findings suggest that the search for the biological basis of personality traits may be more profitably focused on the 5 factors themselves and their specific facets, especially in monomethod studies.
Stichworte
cross-cultural; behavior genetics; Big Five; five-factor model; cross-observer
Erscheinungsjahr
2008
Zeitschriftentitel
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Band
95
Ausgabe
2
Seite(n)
442-455
ISSN
0022-3514
eISSN
1939-1315
Page URI
https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/1586951

Zitieren

McCrae RR, Yamagata S, Jang KL, et al. Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. 2008;95(2):442-455.
McCrae, R. R., Yamagata, S., Jang, K. L., Riemann, R., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Angleitner, A., et al. (2008). Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 95(2), 442-455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.442
McCrae, Robert R., Yamagata, Shinji, Jang, Kerry L., Riemann, Rainer, Ando, Juko, Ono, Yutaka, Angleitner, Alois, and Spinath, Frank M. 2008. “Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five”. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 95 (2): 442-455.
McCrae, R. R., Yamagata, S., Jang, K. L., Riemann, R., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Angleitner, A., and Spinath, F. M. (2008). Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 95, 442-455.
McCrae, R.R., et al., 2008. Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 95(2), p 442-455.
R.R. McCrae, et al., “Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five”, JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 95, 2008, pp. 442-455.
McCrae, R.R., Yamagata, S., Jang, K.L., Riemann, R., Ando, J., Ono, Y., Angleitner, A., Spinath, F.M.: Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. 95, 442-455 (2008).
McCrae, Robert R., Yamagata, Shinji, Jang, Kerry L., Riemann, Rainer, Ando, Juko, Ono, Yutaka, Angleitner, Alois, and Spinath, Frank M. “Substance and artifact in the higher-order factors of the Big Five”. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 95.2 (2008): 442-455.

20 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Personality Traits: Hierarchically Organized Systems.
Fajkowska M., J Pers 86(1), 2018
PMID: 28295309
Resting-state functional brain connectivity best predicts the personality dimension of openness to experience.
Dubois J, Galdi P, Han Y, Paul LK, Adolphs R., Personal Neurosci 1(), 2018
PMID: 30225394
A Meta-Analytic Multitrait Multirater Separation of Substance and Style in Social Desirability Scales.
Connelly BS, Chang L., J Pers 84(3), 2016
PMID: 25565409
Personality Traits and Successful Aging: Findings From the Georgia Centenarian Study.
Baek Y, Martin P, Siegler IC, Davey A, Poon LW., Int J Aging Hum Dev 83(3), 2016
PMID: 27298487
Egoistic and moralistic self-enhancement in the eye of the beholder: a cross-informant study.
Vecchione M, Alessandri G., J Pers 82(5), 2014
PMID: 24117980
How universal is the Big Five? Testing the five-factor model of personality variation among forager-farmers in the Bolivian Amazon.
Gurven M, von Rueden C, Massenkoff M, Kaplan H, Lero Vie M., J Pers Soc Psychol 104(2), 2013
PMID: 23245291
Alpha and Beta traits and egoistic and moralistic self-enhancement: a point of convergence between two research traditions.
Vecchione M, Alessandri G., J Pers 81(1), 2013
PMID: 22432909
Exploring trait assessment of samples, persons, and cultures.
McCrae RR., J Pers Assess 95(6), 2013
PMID: 23924211
Structure of observed temperament in middle childhood.
Kotelnikova Y, Olino TM, Mackrell SV, Jordan PL, Hayden EP., J Res Pers 47(5), 2013
PMID: 24293740
Parent Personality and Positive Parenting as Predictors of Positive Adolescent Personality Development Over Time.
Schofield TJ, Conger RD, Donnellan MB, Jochem R, Widaman KF, Conger KJ., Merrill Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ Press) 58(2), 2012
PMID: 22822287
Broad bandwidth or high fidelity? Evidence from the structure of genetic and environmental effects on the facets of the five factor model.
Briley DA, Tucker-Drob EM., Behav Genet 42(5), 2012
PMID: 22695681
Development of big five domains and facets in adulthood: mean-level age trends and broadly versus narrowly acting mechanisms.
Soto CJ, John OP., J Pers 80(4), 2012
PMID: 22091969
Higher-order factors of the big five and basic values: empirical and theoretical relations.
Vecchione M, Alessandri G, Barbaranelli C, Caprara G., Br J Psychol 102(3), 2011
PMID: 21752001
The genetic links between the big five personality traits and general interest domains.
Kandler C, Bleidorn W, Riemann R, Angleitner A, Spinath FM., Pers Soc Psychol Bull 37(12), 2011
PMID: 21742861
Sources of variance in personality facets: a multiple-rater twin study of self-peer, peer-peer, and self-self (dis)agreement.
Kandler C, Riemann R, Spinath FM, Angleitner A., J Pers 78(5), 2010
PMID: 20663023
Genetic and environmental mediation between measures of personality and family environment in twins reared together.
Kandler C, Riemann R, Kämpfe N., Behav Genet 39(1), 2009
PMID: 19005750
Not all conscientiousness scales change alike: a multimethod, multisample study of age differences in the facets of conscientiousness.
Jackson JJ, Bogg T, Walton KE, Wood D, Harms PD, Lodi-Smith J, Edmonds GW, Roberts BW., J Pers Soc Psychol 96(2), 2009
PMID: 19159142
Metatraits of the Big Five differentially predict engagement and restraint of behavior.
Hirsh JB, Deyoung CG, Peterson JB., J Pers 77(4), 2009
PMID: 19558442
Higher order factors of personality: do they exist?
Ashton MC, Lee K, Goldberg LR, de Vries RE., Pers Soc Psychol Rev 13(2), 2009
PMID: 19458345
Evidence for shared genetic dominance between the general factor of personality, mental and physical health, and life history traits.
Figueredo AJ, Rushton JP., Twin Res Hum Genet 12(6), 2009
PMID: 19943718

55 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Twins and the study of rater (dis)agreement.
Bartels M, Boomsma DI, Hudziak JJ, van Beijsterveldt TCEM, van den Oord EJCG., Psychol Methods 12(4), 2007
PMID: 18179355
Beyond the Big Five
Becker P., 1999
From adorable to worthless: Implicit and self-report structure of highly evaluative personality descriptors
Benet-Martinez V, Waller NG., 2002
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler PM., Psychol Bull 107(2), 1990
PMID: 2320703
Towards understanding assessments of the big five: multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer.
Biesanz JC, West SG., J Pers 72(4), 2004
PMID: 15210019
Genetic and environmental influences on observed personality: evidence from the German Observational Study of Adult Twins.
Borkenau P, Riemann R, Angleitner A, Spinath FM., J Pers Soc Psychol 80(4), 2001
PMID: 11316228
Genes, evolution, and personality.
Bouchard TJ Jr, Loehlin JC., Behav. Genet. 31(3), 2001
PMID: 11699599
Alternative ways of assessing model fit
Browne MW, Cudeck R., 1992
Methods as diluting trait relationships rather than adding irrelevant systematic variance
Campbell DT, O’Connell EJ., 1982
An fMRI study of personality influences on brain reactivity to emotional stimuli.
Canli T, Zhao Z, Desmond JE, Kang E, Gross J, Gabrieli JD., Behav. Neurosci. 115(1), 2001
PMID: 11256451
The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis.
Cole DA, Ciesla JA, Steiger JH., Psychol Methods 12(4), 2007
PMID: 18179350

Costa PT, McCrae RR., 1992
Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data.
Cumming G, Finch S., Am Psychol 60(2), 2005
PMID: 15740449
Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample.
DeYoung CG., J Pers Soc Psychol 91(6), 2006
PMID: 17144770
Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health?
DeYoung CG, Peterson JB, Higgins DM., 2002
Higher-order factors of the Big Five.
Digman JM., J Pers Soc Psychol 73(6), 1997
PMID: 9418278
An evaluation of evaluative personality terms: a comparison of the big seven and five-factor model in predicting psychopathology.
Durrett C, Trull TJ., Psychol Assess 17(3), 2005
PMID: 16262461
Four ways five factors are not basic
Eysenck HJ., 1992
Viewpoints on personality: Consensus, self-other agreement and accuracy in personality judgment [Special issue]
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 1993
The Five-Factor Personality Inventory: Assessing the Big Five by means of brief and concrete statements
Hendriks AAJ, Hofstee WKB, De B., 2002

Jang KL., 2005
Behavioral genetics of the higher-order factors of the Big Five
Jang KL, Livesley WJ, Ando J, Yamagata S, Suzuki A, Angleitner A., 2006
Heritability of facet-level traits in a cross-cultural twin sample: support for a hierarchical model of personality.
Jang KL, McCrae RR, Angleitner A, Riemann R, Livesley WJ., J Pers Soc Psychol 74(6), 1998
PMID: 9654759

Kenny DA., 2003
The structure of common mental disorders
Krueger RF., 1999
The behavioral genetics of personality disorder.
Livesley WJ, Jang KL., Annu Rev Clin Psychol 4(), 2008
PMID: 17716041
Extraversion and emotional reactivity.
Lucas RE, Baird BM., J Pers Soc Psychol 86(3), 2004
PMID: 15008650
Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach.
Markon KE, Krueger RF, Watson D., J Pers Soc Psychol 88(1), 2005
PMID: 15631580

Maslow AH., 1954
A new Big Five: fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality.
McAdams DP, Pals JL., Am Psychol 61(3), 2006
PMID: 16594837
Different points of view: Self-reports and ratings in the assessment of personality
McCrae RR, Costa PT., 1989
Discriminant validity of NEO-PI-R facets
McCrae RR, Costa PT., 1992
Positive and negative valence within the five-factor model
McCrae RR, Costa PT., 1995
A five-factor theory of personality
McCrae RR, Costa PT., 1999
The five-factor theory of personality
McCrae RR, Costa PT., 2008
The NEO-PI-3: a more readable revised NEO Personality Inventory.
McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr, Martin TA., J Pers Assess 84(3), 2005
PMID: 15907162
Sources of structure: genetic, environmental, and artifactual influences on the covariation of personality traits.
McCrae RR, Jang KL, Livesley WJ, Riemann R, Angleitner A., J Pers 69(4), 2001
PMID: 11497029
An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications.
McCrae RR, John OP., J Pers 60(2), 1992
PMID: 1635039
Age trends and age norms for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 in adolescents and adults.
McCrae RR, Martin TA, Costa PT Jr., Assessment 12(4), 2005
PMID: 16244117

Neale M, Boker SM, Xie G, Maes HH., 2004

Ostendorf F, Angleitner A., 2004
Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives
Paulhus DL, John OP., 1998
On the invalidity of validity scales: evidence from self-reports and observer ratings in volunteer samples.
Piedmont RL, McCrae RR, Riemann R, Angleitner A., J Pers Soc Psychol 78(3), 2000
PMID: 10743882
Why are children in the same family so different from one another?
Plomin R, Daniels D., 1987
Trait as default: extraversion, subjective well-being, and the distinction between neutral and positive events.
Robinson MD, Solberg EC, Vargas PT, Tamir M., J Pers Soc Psychol 85(3), 2003
PMID: 14498787

Rogers CR., 1961
Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: premises, products, and prospects.
Saucier G, Goldberg LR, Institute OR., J Pers 69(6), 2001
PMID: 11767821
Lay conceptions of the five-factor model and its indicators
Sneed CD, McCrae RR, Funder DC., 1998
German Observational Study of Adult Twins (GOSAT): A multimodal investigation of personality, temperament and cognitive ability
Spinath FM, Angleitner A, Borkenau P, Riemann R, Wolf H., 2002
Structural equation modeling
Steiger JH., 1995
The Jena Twin Registry and the Jena Twin Study of Social Attitudes (JeTSSA).
Stossel K, Kampfe N, Riemann R., Twin Res Hum Genet 9(6), 2006
PMID: 17254408

Tellegen A, Grove WM, Waller NG., 1991
Structural equation modeling [Special issue]
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2007
Is the genetic structure of human personality universal? A cross-cultural twin study from North America, Europe, and Asia.
Yamagata S, Suzuki A, Ando J, Ono Y, Kijima N, Yoshimura K, Ostendorf F, Angleitner A, Riemann R, Spinath FM, Livesley WJ, Jang KL., J Pers Soc Psychol 90(6), 2006
PMID: 16784347
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): A population-based survey in Aomori prefecture
Yoshimura K, Nakamura K, Ono Y, Sakurai A, Saito N, Mitani M., 1998
Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®
Quellen

PMID: 18665712
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar