Optimal integration of actions and their visual effects is based on both online and prior causality evidence

Debats N, Heuer H (2018)
Scientific Reports 8(1): 9796.

Download
OA 3.07 MB
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Volltext vorhanden für diesen Nachweis
Abstract / Bemerkung
The brain needs to identify redundant sensory signals in order to integrate them optimally. The identification process, referred to as causal inference, depends on the spatial and temporal correspondence of the incoming sensory signals (‘online sensory causality evidence’) as well as on prior expectations regarding their causal relation. We here examine whether the same causal inference process underlies spatial integration of actions and their visual consequences. We used a basic cursor-control task for which online sensory causality evidence is provided by the correlated hand and cursor movements, and prior expectations are formed by everyday experience of such correlated movements. Participants made out-and-back movements and subsequently judged the hand or cursor movement endpoints. In one condition, we omitted the online sensory causality evidence by showing the cursor only at the movement endpoint. The integration strength was lower than in conditions where the cursor was visible during the outward movement, but a substantial level of integration persisted. These findings support the hypothesis that the binding of actions and their visual consequences is based on the general mechanism of optimal integration, and they specifically show that such binding can occur even if it is previous experience only that identifies the action consequence.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Scientific Reports
Band
8
Ausgabe
1
Art.-Nr.
9796
eISSN
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Article Processing Charge funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University.
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Debats N, Heuer H. Optimal integration of actions and their visual effects is based on both online and prior causality evidence. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1): 9796.
Debats, N., & Heuer, H. (2018). Optimal integration of actions and their visual effects is based on both online and prior causality evidence. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 9796. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28251-x
Debats, N., and Heuer, H. (2018). Optimal integration of actions and their visual effects is based on both online and prior causality evidence. Scientific Reports 8:9796.
Debats, N., & Heuer, H., 2018. Optimal integration of actions and their visual effects is based on both online and prior causality evidence. Scientific Reports, 8(1): 9796.
N. Debats and H. Heuer, “Optimal integration of actions and their visual effects is based on both online and prior causality evidence”, Scientific Reports, vol. 8, 2018, : 9796.
Debats, N., Heuer, H.: Optimal integration of actions and their visual effects is based on both online and prior causality evidence. Scientific Reports. 8, : 9796 (2018).
Debats, Nienke, and Heuer, Herbert. “Optimal integration of actions and their visual effects is based on both online and prior causality evidence”. Scientific Reports 8.1 (2018): 9796.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0):
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2018-07-11T07:03:55Z

2 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

45 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.


AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Bayesian integration of spatial information.
Cheng K, Shettleworth SJ, Huttenlocher J, Rieser JJ., Psychol Bull 133(4), 2007
PMID: 17592958
Object perception as Bayesian inference.
Kersten D, Mamassian P, Yuille A., Annu Rev Psychol 55(), 2004
PMID: 14744217
Sound-induced flash illusion as an optimal percept.
Shams L, Ma WJ, Beierholm U., Neuroreport 16(17), 2005
PMID: 16272880
Multisensory integration, perception and ecological validity.
De Gelder B, Bertelson P., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 7(10), 2003
PMID: 14550494
Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy.
Welch RB, Warren DH., Psychol Bull 88(3), 1980
PMID: 7003641

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Causal inference in perception.
Shams L, Beierholm UR., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 14(9), 2010
PMID: 20705502

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Causal inference in multisensory perception.
Kording KP, Beierholm U, Ma WJ, Quartz S, Tenenbaum JB, Shams L., PLoS ONE 2(9), 2007
PMID: 17895984
Probability matching as a computational strategy used in perception.
Wozny DR, Beierholm UR, Shams L., PLoS Comput. Biol. 6(8), 2010
PMID: 20700493
Human trimodal perception follows optimal statistical inference.
Wozny DR, Beierholm UR, Shams L., J Vis 8(3), 2008
PMID: 18484830

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Temporal and spatial dependency of the ventriloquism effect.
Slutsky DA, Recanzone GH., Neuroreport 12(1), 2001
PMID: 11201094
The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity.
Gepshtein S, Burge J, Ernst MO, Banks MS., J Vis 5(11), 2005
PMID: 16441199
When correlation implies causation in multisensory integration.
Parise CV, Spence C, Ernst MO., Curr. Biol. 22(1), 2011
PMID: 22177899

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
A dedicated binding mechanism for the visual control of movement.
Reichenbach A, Franklin DW, Zatka-Haas P, Diedrichsen J., Curr. Biol. 24(7), 2014
PMID: 24631246
Perceptual attraction in tool use: evidence for a reliability-based weighting mechanism.
Debats NB, Ernst MO, Heuer H., J. Neurophysiol. 117(4), 2017
PMID: 28100656
Kinematic cross-correlation induces sensory integration across separate objects.
Debats NB, Ernst MO, Heuer H., Eur. J. Neurosci. 46(12), 2017
PMID: 29068094

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Intra- and intermodal integration of discrepant visual and proprioceptive action effects.
Ladwig S, Sutter C, Musseler J., Exp Brain Res 231(4), 2013
PMID: 24101198
Spatial action-effect binding.
Kirsch W, Pfister R, Kunde W., Atten Percept Psychophys 78(1), 2016
PMID: 26486641
Voluntary action and conscious awareness.
Haggard P, Clark S, Kalogeras J., Nat. Neurosci. 5(4), 2002
PMID: 11896397

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Recalibration of multisensory simultaneity: cross-modal transfer coincides with a change in perceptual latency
Di M, Machulla T-K, Ernst MO., 2009
Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning.
Sober SJ, Sabes PN., Nat. Neurosci. 8(4), 2005
PMID: 15793578
An internal model for sensorimotor integration.
Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI., Science 269(5232), 1995
PMID: 7569931
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato M., Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9(6), 1999
PMID: 10607637
When knowing can replace seeing in audiovisual integration of actions.
Petrini K, Russell M, Pollick F., Cognition 110(3), 2009
PMID: 19121519
Bayesian approaches to sensory integration for motor control.
Berniker M, Kording K., Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 2(4), 2011
PMID: 26302201
Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.
Kording KP, Wolpert DM., Nature 427(6971), 2004
PMID: 14724638

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Experience can change the 'light-from-above' prior.
Adams WJ, Graf EW, Ernst MO., Nat. Neurosci. 7(10), 2004
PMID: 15361877
Sensorimotor priors in nonstationary environments.
Narain D, van Beers RJ, Smeets JB, Brenner E., J. Neurophysiol. 109(5), 2012
PMID: 23235999
Learning Bayesian priors for depth perception.
Knill DC., J Vis 7(8), 2007
PMID: 17685820

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 29955156
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar