Retention of nutrients, suspended particulate matter and phytoplankton in a pondage associated with a run-of-the-river type hydroelectric power plant

Sow MM, Majdi N, Muylaert K, Tackx M, Julien F, Probst J-L, Mialet B, Sutra C, Probst A, Thebault J-M, Kenarlikdjian M, et al. (2016)
ECOHYDROLOGY 9(2): 229-237.

Download
No fulltext has been uploaded. References only!
Journal Article | Original Article | Published | English

No fulltext has been uploaded

Author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
All
Abstract
Reservoirs associated with run-of-the-river type hydroelectrical power plants (i.e. pondages) have short water residence times. For this reason, pondages are thought to have a limited impact on the fluxes of particles and solutes transported by rivers. The Malause reservoir (South West France) is such a pondage. Fed by both the Garonne and Tarn rivers, it has a water residence time of only a few days. Incoming and outgoing fluxes of nutrients, suspended particulate matter (SPM) and phytoplankton were measured weekly over the course of 1year. Mass balance calculations showed that Malause pondage retained 24% of soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) supplied by both rivers on an annual basis. SRP retention occurred mostly in spring-summer, pointing to biological uptake. In addition, the pondage was a sink for SPM and phytoplankton, retaining 39% of SPM and 14% of chlorophyll a supplied by both rivers on an annual basis. The retention efficiency appeared to be constrained by water temperature and residence time. The pondage was a source of phytoplankton during summer, when temperature and water residence time was high. The pondage was a sink for SPM when water residence time was low (<1day). Our observations highlight the need to reconsider the impact of minor hydrological discontinuities on the functioning of the river continuum. The shallow depth of the pondage and the presence of dense stands of submerged macrophytes have probably favoured the retention of nutrients and the sedimentation of particles within the pondage. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Publishing Year
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Sow MM, Majdi N, Muylaert K, et al. Retention of nutrients, suspended particulate matter and phytoplankton in a pondage associated with a run-of-the-river type hydroelectric power plant. ECOHYDROLOGY. 2016;9(2):229-237.
Sow, M. M., Majdi, N., Muylaert, K., Tackx, M., Julien, F., Probst, J. - L., Mialet, B., et al. (2016). Retention of nutrients, suspended particulate matter and phytoplankton in a pondage associated with a run-of-the-river type hydroelectric power plant. ECOHYDROLOGY, 9(2), 229-237. doi:10.1002/eco.1626
Sow, M. M., Majdi, N., Muylaert, K., Tackx, M., Julien, F., Probst, J. - L., Mialet, B., Sutra, C., Probst, A., Thebault, J. - M., et al. (2016). Retention of nutrients, suspended particulate matter and phytoplankton in a pondage associated with a run-of-the-river type hydroelectric power plant. ECOHYDROLOGY 9, 229-237.
Sow, M.M., et al., 2016. Retention of nutrients, suspended particulate matter and phytoplankton in a pondage associated with a run-of-the-river type hydroelectric power plant. ECOHYDROLOGY, 9(2), p 229-237.
M.M. Sow, et al., “Retention of nutrients, suspended particulate matter and phytoplankton in a pondage associated with a run-of-the-river type hydroelectric power plant”, ECOHYDROLOGY, vol. 9, 2016, pp. 229-237.
Sow, M.M., Majdi, N., Muylaert, K., Tackx, M., Julien, F., Probst, J.-L., Mialet, B., Sutra, C., Probst, A., Thebault, J.-M., Kenarlikdjian, M., Gerino, M.: Retention of nutrients, suspended particulate matter and phytoplankton in a pondage associated with a run-of-the-river type hydroelectric power plant. ECOHYDROLOGY. 9, 229-237 (2016).
Sow, Mohamadou Mamoudou, Majdi, Nabil, Muylaert, Koenraad, Tackx, Micky, Julien, Frederic, Probst, Jean-Luc, Mialet, Benoit, Sutra, Carine, Probst, Anne, Thebault, Jean-Marc, Kenarlikdjian, Mathilde, and Gerino, Magali. “Retention of nutrients, suspended particulate matter and phytoplankton in a pondage associated with a run-of-the-river type hydroelectric power plant”. ECOHYDROLOGY 9.2 (2016): 229-237.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Search this title in

Google Scholar