Synthesizing Disparate Ideas: How a Chinese Model of Social Assistance Was Forged

Leisering L, Liu T, ten Brink T (2017)
Global Social Policy 17(3): 307-327.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
; ;
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Global Social Policy
Band
17
Zeitschriftennummer
3
Seite
307-327
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Leisering L, Liu T, ten Brink T. Synthesizing Disparate Ideas: How a Chinese Model of Social Assistance Was Forged. Global Social Policy. 2017;17(3):307-327.
Leisering, L., Liu, T., & ten Brink, T. (2017). Synthesizing Disparate Ideas: How a Chinese Model of Social Assistance Was Forged. Global Social Policy, 17(3), 307-327. doi:10.1177/1468018117704381
Leisering, L., Liu, T., and ten Brink, T. (2017). Synthesizing Disparate Ideas: How a Chinese Model of Social Assistance Was Forged. Global Social Policy 17, 307-327.
Leisering, L., Liu, T., & ten Brink, T., 2017. Synthesizing Disparate Ideas: How a Chinese Model of Social Assistance Was Forged. Global Social Policy, 17(3), p 307-327.
L. Leisering, T. Liu, and T. ten Brink, “Synthesizing Disparate Ideas: How a Chinese Model of Social Assistance Was Forged”, Global Social Policy, vol. 17, 2017, pp. 307-327.
Leisering, L., Liu, T., ten Brink, T.: Synthesizing Disparate Ideas: How a Chinese Model of Social Assistance Was Forged. Global Social Policy. 17, 307-327 (2017).
Leisering, Lutz, Liu, Tao, and ten Brink, Tobias. “Synthesizing Disparate Ideas: How a Chinese Model of Social Assistance Was Forged”. Global Social Policy 17.3 (2017): 307-327.