On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006)

Geiser C, Eid M, Nussbeck FW (2008)
Psychological methods 13(1): 49-57.

Journal Article | Published | English

No fulltext has been uploaded

Author
; ;
Abstract
In a recent article, A. Maydeu-Olivares and D. L. Coffman (2006) presented a random intercept factor approach for modeling idiosyncratic response styles in questionnaire data and compared this approach with competing confirmatory factor analysis models. Among the competing models was the CT-C(M-1) model (M. Eid, 2000). In an application to the Life Orientation Test (M. F. Scheier & C. S. Carver, 1985), Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman found that results obtained from the CT-C(M-1) model were difficult to interpret. In particular, Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman challenged the asymmetry of the CT-C(M-1) model. In the present article, the authors show that the difficulties faced by Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman rest upon an improper interpretation of the meaning of the latent factors. The authors' aim is to clarify the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model. The authors explain how to properly interpret the results from this model and introduce an alternative restricted model that is conceptually similar to the CT-C(M-1) model and nested within it. The fit of this model is invariant across different reference methods. Finally, the authors provide guidelines as to which model should be used in which research context.
Publishing Year
ISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Geiser C, Eid M, Nussbeck FW. On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological methods. 2008;13(1):49-57.
Geiser, C., Eid, M., & Nussbeck, F. W. (2008). On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological methods, 13(1), 49-57.
Geiser, C., Eid, M., and Nussbeck, F. W. (2008). On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological methods 13, 49-57.
Geiser, C., Eid, M., & Nussbeck, F.W., 2008. On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological methods, 13(1), p 49-57.
C. Geiser, M. Eid, and F.W. Nussbeck, “On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006)”, Psychological methods, vol. 13, 2008, pp. 49-57.
Geiser, C., Eid, M., Nussbeck, F.W.: On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological methods. 13, 49-57 (2008).
Geiser, Christian, Eid, Michael, and Nussbeck, Fridtjof W. “On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: a comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006)”. Psychological methods 13.1 (2008): 49-57.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

13 Citations in Europe PMC

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Analyzing Statistical Mediation with Multiple Informants: A New Approach with an Application in Clinical Psychology.
Papa LA, Litson K, Lockhart G, Chassin L, Geiser C., Front Psychol 6(), 2015
PMID: 26617536
A longitudinal multilevel CFA-MTMM model for interchangeable and structurally different methods.
Koch T, Schultze M, Eid M, Geiser C., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 24860515
First Versus Second Order Latent Growth Curve Models: Some Insights From Latent State-Trait Theory.
Geiser C, Keller B, Lockhart G., Struct Equ Modeling 20(3), 2013
PMID: 24244087
Interpreting the psychometric properties of the components of primary care instrument in an elderly population.
Aspy CB, Hamm RM, Schauf KJ, Mold JW, Flocke S., J Family Community Med 19(2), 2012
PMID: 22870416
The importance of modeling method effects: resolving the (uni)dimensionality of the loneliness questionnaire.
Ebesutani C, Drescher CF, Reise SP, Heiden L, Hight TL, Damon JD, Young J., J Pers Assess 94(2), 2012
PMID: 22339311
Cross-informant symptoms from CBCL, TRF, and YSR: trait and method variance in a normative sample of Russian youths.
Grigorenko EL, Geiser C, Slobodskaya HR, Francis DJ., Psychol Assess 22(4), 2010
PMID: 21133549

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Sources

PMID: 18331153
PubMed | Europe PMC

Search this title in

Google Scholar