Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes

Schindler S, Wolff W, Kißler J, Brand R (2015)
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 9: 139.

Download
OA
Journal Article | Published | English
Author
; ; ;
Abstract
Direct assessment of attitudes toward socially sensitive topics can be affected by deception attempts. Reaction-time based indirect measures, such as the Implicit Association Test (IAT), are less susceptible to such biases. Neuroscientific evidence shows that deception can evoke characteristic ERP differences. However, the cerebral processes involved in faking an IAT are still unknown. We randomly assigned 20 university students (15 females, 24.65 ± 3.50 years of age) to a counterbalanced repeated-measurements design, requesting them to complete a Brief-IAT (BIAT) on attitudes toward doping without deception instruction, and with the instruction to fake positive and negative doping attitudes. Cerebral activity during BIAT completion was assessed using high-density EEG. Event-related potentials during faking revealed enhanced frontal and reduced occipital negativity, starting around 150 ms after stimulus presentation. Further, a decrease in the P300 and LPP components was observed. Source analyses showed enhanced activity in the right inferior frontal gyrus between 150 and 200 ms during faking, thought to reflect the suppression of automatic responses. Further, more activity was found for faking in the bilateral middle occipital gyri and the bilateral temporoparietal junction. Results indicate that faking reaction-time based tests alter brain processes from early stages of processing and reveal the cortical sources of the effects. Analyzing the EEG helps to uncover response patterns in indirect attitude tests and broadens our understanding of the neural processes involved in such faking. This knowledge might be useful for uncovering faking in socially sensitive contexts, where attitudes are likely to be concealed.
Publishing Year
ISSN
Financial disclosure
Article Processing Charge funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University.
PUB-ID

Cite this

Schindler S, Wolff W, Kißler J, Brand R. Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 2015;9: 139.
Schindler, S., Wolff, W., Kißler, J., & Brand, R. (2015). Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9: 139.
Schindler, S., Wolff, W., Kißler, J., and Brand, R. (2015). Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 9:139.
Schindler, S., et al., 2015. Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9: 139.
S. Schindler, et al., “Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes”, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 9, 2015, : 139.
Schindler, S., Wolff, W., Kißler, J., Brand, R.: Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience. 9, : 139 (2015).
Schindler, Sebastian, Wolff, Wanja, Kißler, Johanna, and Brand, Ralf. “Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes”. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 9 (2015): 139.
Main File(s)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Last Uploaded
2016-02-26T07:00:10Z

This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

1 Citation in Europe PMC

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Sources

PMID: 26074798
PubMed | Europe PMC

Search this title in

Google Scholar