Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review

Seegelke C, Hughes CML, Schack T (2014)
Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1480.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
DOI
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
; ;
Einrichtung
Center of Excellence - Cognitive Interaction Technology CITEC
Fakultät für Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft > Abteilung Sportwissenschaft > Arbeitsbereich II - Neurokognition und Bewegung - Biomechanik
Fakultät für Psychologie und Sportwissenschaft > Abteilung für Psychologie > Arbeitseinheit 14 - Physiologische Psychologie
Projekt
Deep Familiarization and Learning Grounded in Cooperative manual Action and Language - from Analysis to Implementation (FAMULA, LSP-02)
Abstract / Bemerkung
Many activities of daily living require that we physically interact with one or more objects. Object manipulation provides an intriguing domain in which the presence and extent of manual asymmetries can be studied on a motor planning and a motor execution level. In this literature review we present a state of the art for manual asymmetries at the level of motor planning during object manipulation. First, we introduce pioneering work on grasp posture planning. We then sketch the studies investigating the impact of future task demands during unimanual and bimanual object manipulation tasks in healthy adult populations. In sum, in contrast to motor execution, there is little evidence for hand-based performance differences in grasp posture planning. We discuss potential reasons for the lack of manual asymmetries in motor planning and outline potential avenues of future research.
Stichworte
bimanual coordination; grasping; manual asymmetries; end-state comfort; motor planning
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
Zeitschriftentitel
Frontiers in Psychology
Band
5
Seite
1480
ISSN
1664-1078
eISSN
1664-1078
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Seegelke C, Hughes CML, Schack T. Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014;5:1480.
Seegelke, C., Hughes, C. M. L., & Schack, T. (2014). Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1480. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01480
Seegelke, C., Hughes, C. M. L., and Schack, T. (2014). Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 1480.
Seegelke, C., Hughes, C.M.L., & Schack, T., 2014. Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, p 1480.
C. Seegelke, C.M.L. Hughes, and T. Schack, “Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review”, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 5, 2014, pp. 1480.
Seegelke, C., Hughes, C.M.L., Schack, T.: Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review. Frontiers in Psychology. 5, 1480 (2014).
Seegelke, Christian, Hughes, Charmayne Mary Lee, and Schack, Thomas. “Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review”. Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014): 1480.

6 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

End-State Comfort Across the Lifespan: A Cross-Sectional Investigation of How Movement Context Influences Motor Planning in an Overturned Glass Task.
Scharoun SM, Gonzalez DA, Roy EA, Bryden PJ., Motor Control 22(2), 2018
PMID: 28771106
Interlimb Dynamic after Unilateral Focal Lesion of the Cervical Dorsal Corticospinal Tract with Endothelin-1.
Carvalho WA, Bahia CP, Teixeira JC, Gomes-Leal W, Pereira A., Front Neuroanat 11(), 2017
PMID: 29081738
Cognitive Representation of Human Action: Theory, Applications, and Perspectives.
Seegelke C, Schack T., Front Public Health 4(), 2016
PMID: 26925398
Feedforward compensation for novel dynamics depends on force field orientation but is similar for the left and right arms.
Reuter EM, Cunnington R, Mattingley JB, Riek S, Carroll TJ., J Neurophysiol 116(5), 2016
PMID: 27582293
Neurophysiology of Grasping Actions: Evidence from ERPs.
Koester D, Schack T, Westerholz J., Front Psychol 7(), 2016
PMID: 28066310
Frames of reference in action plan recall: influence of hand and handedness.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Wunsch K, van der Wel R, Weigelt M., Exp Brain Res 233(10), 2015
PMID: 26070901

70 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

The persistence of spatial interference after extended training in a bimanual drawing task.
Albert NB, Ivry RB., Cortex 45(3), 2008
PMID: 18718578
The control of movement in the preferred and non-preferred hands.
Annett J, Annett M, Hudson PT, Turner A., Q J Exp Psychol 31(Pt 4), 1979
PMID: 534286
A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand strengths.
Armstrong CA, Oldham JA., J Hand Surg Br 24(4), 1999
PMID: 10473148
An investigation of the neural circuits underlying reaching and reach-to-grasp movements: from planning to execution.
Begliomini C, De Sanctis T, Marangon M, Tarantino V, Sartori L, Miotto D, Motta R, Stramare R, Castiello U., Front Hum Neurosci 8(), 2014
PMID: 25228872
“Mechanika i koordinacija dviženij celoveka (Mechanik und koordination der bewegungen des menschen),” in
Bernstein N.., 1941
“Lateral preferences, skilled behavior and task complexity: hand and foot,” in
Bryden P.., 2000
Spatial task demands affect the extent of manual asymmetries.
Bryden PJ, Roy EA., Laterality 4(1), 1999
PMID: 15513102
Task demands affect manual asymmetries in pegboard performance.
Bryden PJ, Roy EA, Rohr LE, Egilo S., Laterality 12(4), 2007
PMID: 17558818
The role of impulse variability in manual-aiming asymmetries.
Carson R., Elliott D., Goodmann D., Thyer L., Chua R., Roy E.., 1993
Generalized representation of handwriting: evidence of effector independence.
Castiello U., Stelmach G.., 1993
Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans.
Cohen RG, Rosenbaum DA., Exp Brain Res 157(4), 2004
PMID: 15071711
Fifty centuries of right-handedness: the historical record.
Coren S, Porac C., Science 198(4317), 1977
PMID: 335510
Visual information for action planning in left and right congenital hemiparesis.
Craje C, van der Kamp J, Steenbergen B., Brain Res. 1261(), 2009
PMID: 19401180
“Manual asymmetries in goal-directed movements,” in
Elliott D., Chua R.., 1996
The end-state comfort effect in bimanual grip selection.
Fischman MG, Stodden DF, Lehman DM., Res Q Exerc Sport 74(1), 2003
PMID: 12659472
Tool use, communicative gesture and cerebral asymmetries in the modern human brain.
Frey SH., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 363(1499), 2008
PMID: 18292060
Anticipatory planning and control of grasp positions and forces for dexterous two-digit manipulation.
Fu Q, Zhang W, Santello M., J. Neurosci. 30(27), 2010
PMID: 20610745
Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action.
Glover S., Behav Brain Sci 27(1), 2004
PMID: 15481943
Distinct cortical networks support the planning and online control of reaching-to-grasp in humans.
Glover S, Wall MB, Smith AT., Eur. J. Neurosci. 35(6), 2012
PMID: 22429244
The biological and behavioral basis of upper limb asymmetries in sensorimotor performance.
Goble DJ, Brown SH., Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32(3), 2007
PMID: 18160103
Parieto-frontal connectivity during visually guided grasping.
Grol MJ, Majdandzic J, Stephan KE, Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC, Bekkering H, Verstraten FA, Toni I., J. Neurosci. 27(44), 2007
PMID: 17978028
Neural representations of skilled movement.
Haaland KY, Harrington DL, Knight RT., Brain 123 ( Pt 11)(), 2000
PMID: 11050030
Planning and control of hand orientation in grasping movements.
Herbort O, Butz MV., Exp Brain Res 202(4), 2010
PMID: 20195848
Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling.
Herbort O, Butz MV., Exp Brain Res 213(4), 2011
PMID: 21748333
The continuous end-state comfort effect: weighted integration of multiple biases.
Herbort O, Butz MV., Psychol Res 76(3), 2011
PMID: 21499901
Effects of unilateral brain damage on grip selection, coordination, and kinematics of ipsilesional prehension.
Hermsdorfer J, Laimgruber K, Kerkhoff G, Mai N, Goldenberg G., Exp Brain Res 128(1-2), 1999
PMID: 10473738
Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects.
Hughes CM, Franz EA., Exp Brain Res 188(4), 2008
PMID: 18443769
Motor planning and execution in left- and right-handed individuals during a bimanual grasping and placing task.
Hughes CM, Reissig P, Seegelke C., Acta Psychol (Amst) 138(1), 2011
PMID: 21663882
Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.
Hughes CM, Haddad JM, Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, Ryu JH., Exp Brain Res 211(2), 2011
PMID: 21484393
Problems in planning bimanually incongruent grasp postures relate to simultaneous response specification processes.
Hughes CM, Seegelke C, Reissig P., Brain Cogn 87(), 2014
PMID: 24650762
The influence of initial and final precision on motor planning: individual differences in end-state comfort during unimanual grasping and placing.
Hughes CM, Seegelke C, Schack T., J Mot Behav 44(3), 2012
PMID: 22551086
Effects of stimulus cueing on bimanual grasp posture planning.
Hughes CM, Seegelke C, Reissig P, Schutz C., Exp Brain Res 219(3), 2012
PMID: 22562588
Corrections in grasp posture in response to modifications of action goals.
Hughes CM, Seegelke C, Spiegel MA, Oehmichen C, Hammes J, Schack T., PLoS ONE 7(9), 2012
PMID: 22970119
Perturbations in action goal influence bimanual grasp posture planning.
Hughes CM, Seegelke C., J Mot Behav 45(6), 2013
PMID: 24006878
Combined effects of planning and execution constraints on bimanual task performance.
Janssen L, Beuting M, Meulenbroek R, Steenbergen B., Exp Brain Res 192(1), 2008
PMID: 18751972
Motor planning in bimanual object manipulation: two plans for two hands?
Janssen L, Craje C, Weigelt M, Steenbergen B., Motor Control 14(2), 2010
PMID: 20484772
Behavioral evidence for left-hemisphere specialization of motor planning.
Janssen L, Meulenbroek RG, Steenbergen B., Exp Brain Res 209(1), 2010
PMID: 21184219
“Behavioral analysis of movement,” in
Keele S.., 1981
Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements.
Keele SW, Posner MI., J Exp Psychol 77(1), 1968
PMID: 5663587
Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor cortex: hemispheric asymmetry and handedness.
Kim SG, Ashe J, Hendrich K, Ellermann JM, Merkle H, Ugurbil K, Georgopoulos AP., Science 261(5121), 1993
PMID: 8342027
Basic neural mechanisms in behavior.
Lashley K.., 1930
Integrative functions of the cerebral cortex.
Lashley K.., 1933
Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements.
Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, Smith JE., Psychol Rev 95(3), 1988
PMID: 3406245
Prolonged practice of a simple motor task by preferred and nonpreffered hands.
Peters M., Percept Mot Skills 42(43), 1976
PMID: 980640
Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule.
Petersen P, Petrick M, Connor H, Conklin D., Am J Occup Ther 43(7), 1989
PMID: 2750859
A blueprint for movement: functional and anatomical representations in the human motor system.
Rijntjes M, Dettmers C, Buchel C, Kiebel S, Frackowiak RS, Weiller C., J. Neurosci. 19(18), 1999
PMID: 10479704
Choosing actions.
Rosenbaum DA, Chapman KM, Coelho CJ, Gong L, Studenka BE., Front Psychol 4(), 2013
PMID: 23761769
Cognition, action, and object manipulation.
Rosenbaum DA, Chapman KM, Weigelt M, Weiss DJ, van der Wel R., Psychol Bull 138(5), 2012
PMID: 22448912
Contraints for action selection: overhand versus underhand grips
Rosenbaum D., Marchak F., Barnes H., Vaughan J., Slotta J., Jorgensen M.., 1990
“Plans for object manipulation,” in
Rosenbaum D., Vaughan J., Barnes H., Stewart E.., 1993
Manual asymmetries in aimed movements.
Roy E., Elliott D.., 1989
Motor resonance in left- and right-handers: evidence for effector-independent motor representations.
Sartori L, Begliomini C, Castiello U., Front Hum Neurosci 7(), 2013
PMID: 23408666
Representation and learning in motor action – bridges between experimental research and cognitive robotics.
Schack T., Ritter H.., 2013
Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Knoblauch A, Schack T., Acta Psychol (Amst) 144(3), 2013
PMID: 24095853
Simulating my own or others action plans?--Motor representations, not visual representations are recalled in motor memory.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schack T., PLoS ONE 8(12), 2013
PMID: 24367689
An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 215(1), 2011
PMID: 21938544
Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schutz C, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 222(1-2), 2012
PMID: 22885998
Constraints on grip selection in cerebral palsy. Minimising discomfort.
Steenbergen B, Hulstijn W, Dortmans S., Exp Brain Res 134(3), 2000
PMID: 11045363
Constraints on grip selection in hemiparetic cerebral palsy: effects of lesional side, end-point accuracy, and context.
Steenbergen B, Meulenbroek RG, Rosenbaum DA., Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 19(2), 2004
PMID: 15019711
Shared neural resources between left and right interlimb coordination skills: the neural substrate of abstract motor representations.
Swinnen SP, Vangheluwe S, Wagemans J, Coxon JP, Goble DJ, Van Impe A, Sunaert S, Peeters R, Wenderoth N., Neuroimage 49(3), 2009
PMID: 19874897
Hand differences in the rate and variability of rapid tapping.
Todor JI, Kyprie PM., J Mot Behav 12(1), 1980
PMID: 15215068
Lateral asymmetries in arm, wrist and finger movements.
Todor JI, Kyprie PM, Price HL., Cortex 18(4), 1982
PMID: 7166039
Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence for abstract spatiotemporal forms in human motor control.
van der Wel RP, Fleckenstein RM, Jax SA, Rosenbaum DA., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33(5), 2007
PMID: 17924811
Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance.
van der Wel RP, Rosenbaum DA., Exp Brain Res 205(3), 2010
PMID: 20658129
Manual asymmetries in the temporal and spatial control of aimed movements.
van Doorn RR., Hum Mov Sci 27(4), 2008
PMID: 18639362
End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation.
Weigelt M, Kunde W, Prinz W., Exp Psychol 53(2), 2006
PMID: 16909939
Motor control: Mechanisms of motor equivalence in handwriting.
Wing AM., Curr. Biol. 10(6), 2000
PMID: 10744963
Motor Planning.
Wong AL, Haith AM, Krakauer JW., Neuroscientist 21(4), 2014
PMID: 24981338
The accuracy of voluntary movement.
Woodworth R.., 1899
“Generalized motor programs: reexamining claims of effector independence in writing,” in
Wright C.., 1990

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 25566153
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar