Event-Related Potentials Reveal Task-Dependance and Inter-Individual Differences in Negation Processing During Silent Listening and Explicit Truth-Value Evaluation

Herbert C, Kißler J (2014)
Neuroscience 277: 902-910.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
;
Abstract / Bemerkung
In sentences such as dogs cannot fly/bark, evaluation of the truth-value of the sentence is assumed to appear after the negation has been integrated into the sentence structure. Moreover negation processing and truth-value processing are considered effortful processes, whereas processing of the semantic relatedness of the words within sentences is thought to occur automatically. In the present study, modulation of event-related brain potentials (N400 and late positive potential, LPP) was investigated during an implicit task (silent listening) and active truth-value evaluation to test these theoretical assumptions and determine if truth-value evaluation will be modulated by the way participants processed the negated information implicitly prior to truth-value verification. Participants first listened to negated sentences and then evaluated these sentences for their truth-value in an active evaluation task. During passive listening, the LPP was generally more pronounced for targets in false negative (FN) than true negative (TN) sentences, indicating enhanced attention allocation to semantically-related but false targets. N400 modulation by truth-value (FN > TN) was observed in 11 out of 24 participants. However, during active evaluation, processing of semantically-unrelated but true targets (TN) elicited larger N400 and LPP amplitudes as well as a pronounced frontal negativity. This pattern was particularly prominent in those 11 individuals, whose N400 modulation during silent listening indicated that they were more sensitive to violations of the truth-value than to semantic priming effects. The results provide evidence for implicit truth-value processing during silent listening of negated sentences and for task dependence related to inter-individual differences in implicit negation processing. (C) 2014 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Neuroscience
Band
277
Seite
902-910
ISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Herbert C, Kißler J. Event-Related Potentials Reveal Task-Dependance and Inter-Individual Differences in Negation Processing During Silent Listening and Explicit Truth-Value Evaluation. Neuroscience. 2014;277:902-910.
Herbert, C., & Kißler, J. (2014). Event-Related Potentials Reveal Task-Dependance and Inter-Individual Differences in Negation Processing During Silent Listening and Explicit Truth-Value Evaluation. Neuroscience, 277, 902-910. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.043
Herbert, C., and Kißler, J. (2014). Event-Related Potentials Reveal Task-Dependance and Inter-Individual Differences in Negation Processing During Silent Listening and Explicit Truth-Value Evaluation. Neuroscience 277, 902-910.
Herbert, C., & Kißler, J., 2014. Event-Related Potentials Reveal Task-Dependance and Inter-Individual Differences in Negation Processing During Silent Listening and Explicit Truth-Value Evaluation. Neuroscience, 277, p 902-910.
C. Herbert and J. Kißler, “Event-Related Potentials Reveal Task-Dependance and Inter-Individual Differences in Negation Processing During Silent Listening and Explicit Truth-Value Evaluation”, Neuroscience, vol. 277, 2014, pp. 902-910.
Herbert, C., Kißler, J.: Event-Related Potentials Reveal Task-Dependance and Inter-Individual Differences in Negation Processing During Silent Listening and Explicit Truth-Value Evaluation. Neuroscience. 277, 902-910 (2014).
Herbert, C., and Kißler, Johanna. “Event-Related Potentials Reveal Task-Dependance and Inter-Individual Differences in Negation Processing During Silent Listening and Explicit Truth-Value Evaluation”. Neuroscience 277 (2014): 902-910.

26 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

On the process of comparing sentences against pictures
Clark, Cogn Psychol 3(), 1972
Imaging unconscious semantic priming.
Dehaene S, Naccache L, Le Clec'H G, Koechlin E, Mueller M, Dehaene-Lambertz G, van de Moortele PF, Le Bihan D., Nature 395(6702), 1998
PMID: 9783584
Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification.
Fischler I, Bloom PA, Childers DG, Roucos SE, Perry NW Jr., Psychophysiology 20(4), 1983
PMID: 6356204
Global and local context effects in sentence processing
Foss, 1991
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.
Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E., Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55(4), 1983
PMID: 6187540
On methods in the analysis of profile data
Greenhouse, Psychometrika 24(), 1959
When syntax meets semantics.
Gunter TC, Stowe LA, Mulder G., Psychophysiology 34(6), 1997
PMID: 9401421
The experiential view of language comprehension: How is negated text information represented?
Kaup, 2007
Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension.
Kutas M, Federmeier KD., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 4(12), 2000
PMID: 11115760
Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.
Kutas M, Hillyard SA., Science 207(4427), 1980
PMID: 7350657
A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400.
Lau EF, Phillips C, Poeppel D., Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9(12), 2008
PMID: 19020511
Event-related potential correlates of negation in a sentence-picture verification paradigm.
Ludtke J, Friedrich CK, De Filippis M, Kaup B., J Cogn Neurosci 20(8), 2008
PMID: 18303972
Brain potentials and syntactic violations revisited: no evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift.
Munte TF, Heinze HJ, Matzke M, Wieringa BM, Johannes S., Neuropsychologia 36(3), 1998
PMID: 9622187
Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective/retrospective processing theory
Neely, 1989
Word recognition: context effects without priming.
Norris D., Cognition 22(2), 1986
PMID: 3709092
Corpus portal for search in monolingual corpora
Quasthoff, 2006
Negation processing in context is not (always) delayed
Staab, Center Res Lang Tech Rep 20(), 2008
Fractionating the word repetition effect with event-related potentials.
Petten CV, Kutas M, Kluender R, Mitchiner M, McIsaac H., J Cogn Neurosci 3(2), 1991
PMID: 23972089

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 25088913
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar