Effects of monitoring for visual events on distinct components of attention

Poth CH, Petersen A, Bundesen C, Schneider WX (2014)
Frontiers in Psychology 5: 930.

Download
OA
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Volltext vorhanden für diesen Nachweis
Autor
; ; ;
Abstract / Bemerkung
Monitoring the environment for visual events while performing a concurrent task requires adjustment of visual processing priorities. By use of Bundesen’s (1990) Theory of Visual Attention, we investigated how monitoring for an object-based brief event affected distinct components of visual attention in a concurrent task. The perceptual salience of the event was varied. Monitoring reduced the processing speed in the concurrent task, and the reduction was stronger when the event was less salient. The monitoring task neither affected the temporal threshold of conscious perception nor the storage capacity of visual short-term memory nor the efficiency of top-down controlled attentional selection.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Frontiers in Psychology
Band
5
Seite
930
ISSN
eISSN
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Article Processing Charge funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University.
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Poth CH, Petersen A, Bundesen C, Schneider WX. Effects of monitoring for visual events on distinct components of attention. Frontiers in Psychology. 2014;5:930.
Poth, C. H., Petersen, A., Bundesen, C., & Schneider, W. X. (2014). Effects of monitoring for visual events on distinct components of attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 930. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00930
Poth, C. H., Petersen, A., Bundesen, C., and Schneider, W. X. (2014). Effects of monitoring for visual events on distinct components of attention. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 930.
Poth, C.H., et al., 2014. Effects of monitoring for visual events on distinct components of attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, p 930.
C.H. Poth, et al., “Effects of monitoring for visual events on distinct components of attention”, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 5, 2014, pp. 930.
Poth, C.H., Petersen, A., Bundesen, C., Schneider, W.X.: Effects of monitoring for visual events on distinct components of attention. Frontiers in Psychology. 5, 930 (2014).
Poth, Christian H., Petersen, Anders, Bundesen, Claus, and Schneider, Werner X. “Effects of monitoring for visual events on distinct components of attention”. Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014): 930.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Copyright Statement:
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. [...]
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2014-10-01T09:14:52Z

9 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Motor-cognitive dual-task performance: effects of a concurrent motor task on distinct components of visual processing capacity.
Künstler ECS, Finke K, Günther A, Klingner C, Witte O, Bublak P., Psychol Res 82(1), 2018
PMID: 29196834
Ultrahigh temporal resolution of visual presentation using gaming monitors and G-Sync.
Poth CH, Foerster RM, Behler C, Schwanecke U, Schneider WX, Botsch M., Behav Res Methods 50(1), 2018
PMID: 29340970
The Neural Bases of Event Monitoring across Domains: a Simultaneous ERP-fMRI Study.
Tarantino V, Mazzonetto I, Formica S, Causin F, Vallesi A., Front Hum Neurosci 11(), 2017
PMID: 28785212
The contributions of visual and central attention to visual working memory.
Souza AS, Oberauer K., Atten Percept Psychophys 79(7), 2017
PMID: 28600676
Editorial: Theories of visual attention-linking cognition, neuropsychology, and neurophysiology.
Kyllingsbæ S, Vangkilde S, Bundesen C., Front Psychol 6(), 2015
PMID: 26124730
Breaking Object Correspondence Across Saccadic Eye Movements Deteriorates Object Recognition.
Poth CH, Herwig A, Schneider WX., Front Syst Neurosci 9(), 2015
PMID: 26732235

50 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

“Selection for action: some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action,” in
Allport A.., 1987
Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs.
Bakeman R., Behav Res Methods 37(3), 2005
PMID: 16405133
A theory of visual attention.
Bundesen C., Psychol Rev 97(4), 1990
PMID: 2247540

Bundesen C., Habekost T.., 2008
“Theory of visual attention,” in
Bundesen C., Habekost T.., 2014
A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology.
Bundesen C, Habekost T, Kyllingsbaek S., Psychol Rev 112(2), 2005
PMID: 15783288
Functional neuroimaging studies of prospective memory: what have we learnt so far?
Burgess PW, Gonen-Yaacovi G, Volle E., Neuropsychologia 49(8), 2011
PMID: 21329712
Relation of decision-time to the categories of response.
Cartwright D.., 1941
A taxonomy of external and internal attention.
Chun MM, Golomb JD, Turk-Browne NB., Annu Rev Psychol 62(), 2011
PMID: 19575619

Davies D., Parasuraman R.., 1982
Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.
Desimone R, Duncan J., Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18(), 1995
PMID: 7605061
Measuring recognition memory.
Donaldson W., J Exp Psychol Gen 121(3), 1992
PMID: 1402701
EPS Mid-Career Award 2004: brain mechanisms of attention.
Duncan J., Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 59(1), 2006
PMID: 16556554
Systematic analysis of deficits in visual attention.
Duncan J, Bundesen C, Olson A, Humphreys G, Chavda S, Shibuya H., J Exp Psychol Gen 128(4), 1999
PMID: 10650583
Generalizing parametric models by introducing trial-by-trial parameter variability: the case of TVA.
Dyrholm M., Kyllingsbæk S., Espeseth T., Bundesen C.., 2011
Prospective memory: multiple retrieval processes.
Einstein G., McDaniel M.., 2005
Prospective memory in 2000: past, present, and future directions.
Ellis J., Kvavilashvili L.., 2000
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A., Behav Res Methods 39(2), 2007
PMID: 17695343

Field A., Miles J., Field Z.., 2012
Testing attention: comparing the ANT with TVA-based assessment.
Habekost T, Petersen A, Vangkilde S., Behav Res Methods 46(1), 2014
PMID: 23592299
Visuospatial and verbal working memory load: effects on visuospatial vigilance.
Helton WS, Russell PN., Exp Brain Res 224(3), 2012
PMID: 23143034
Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance.
Helton WS, Warm JS., Acta Psychol (Amst) 129(1), 2008
PMID: 18499079

Keppel G.., 1973
Modeling visual attention.
Kyllingsbaek S., Behav Res Methods 38(1), 2006
PMID: 16817521
The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.
Luck SJ, Vogel EK., Nature 390(6657), 1997
PMID: 9384378
The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search.
Mackworth N.., 1948
The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response.
Manly T, Robertson IH, Galloway M, Hawkins K., Neuropsychologia 37(6), 1999
PMID: 10390027
The influence of alertness on spatial and nonspatial components of visual attention.
Matthias E, Bublak P, Muller HJ, Schneider WX, Krummenacher J, Finke K., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 36(1), 2010
PMID: 20121294
The relationship between sustained attention, attentional selectivity, and capacity.
McAvinue L., Vangkilde S., Johnson K., Habekost T., Kyllingsbæk S., Robertson I.., 2012
Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework.
McDaniel M., Einstein G.., 2000
“Automatic processing: a review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory,” in
Neumann O.., 1984
“Beyond capacity: a functional view of attention,” in
Neumann O.., 1987
Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not.
Olivers CN, Peters J, Houtkamp R, Roelfsema PR., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 15(7), 2011
PMID: 21665518
Measuring and modeling attentional dwell time.
Petersen A, Kyllingsbæk S, Bundesen C., Psychon Bull Rev 19(6), 2012
PMID: 22847596
Visual search in complex displays: factors affecting conflict detection by air traffic controllers.
Remington RW, Johnston JC, Ruthruff E, Gold M, Romera M., Hum Factors 42(3), 2000
PMID: 11132797
The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up.
Sarter M, Givens B, Bruno JP., Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 35(2), 2001
PMID: 11336780

Schneider W., Eschman A., Zuccolotto A.., 2002
VAM: a neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition and space-based motor action.
Schneider W.., 1995
Selective visual processing across competition episodes: a theory of task-driven visual attention and working memory.
Schneider WX., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 368(1628), 2013
PMID: 24018722
When is less more? Attention and workload in auditory, visual, and redundant patient-monitoring conditions.
Seagull F., Wickens C., Loeb R.., 2001
A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory.
Smith RE, Bayen UJ., J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30(4), 2004
PMID: 15238021
Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture.
Theeuwes J., Psychon Bull Rev 11(1), 2004
PMID: 15116988
Prompt but inefficient: nicotine differentially modulates discrete components of attention.
Vangkilde S, Bundesen C, Coull JT., Psychopharmacology (Berl.) 218(4), 2011
PMID: 21629997
Great expectations: temporal expectation modulates perceptual processing speed.
Vangkilde S, Coull JT, Bundesen C., J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 38(5), 2012
PMID: 22250866
Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?
Woodman GF, Carlisle NB, Reinhart RM., J Vis 13(3), 2013
PMID: 23444390

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 25191303
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar