Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: Evidence from eye tracking

Guerra E, Knoeferle P (2014)
Cognition 133: 535-552.

Download
OA
Journal Article | Published | English
Publishing Year
ISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Guerra E, Knoeferle P. Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognition. 2014;133:535-552.
Guerra, E., & Knoeferle, P. (2014). Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognition, 133, 535-552.
Guerra, E., and Knoeferle, P. (2014). Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognition 133, 535-552.
Guerra, E., & Knoeferle, P., 2014. Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognition, 133, p 535-552.
E. Guerra and P. Knoeferle, “Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: Evidence from eye tracking”, Cognition, vol. 133, 2014, pp. 535-552.
Guerra, E., Knoeferle, P.: Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognition. 133, 535-552 (2014).
Guerra, Ernesto, and Knoeferle, Pia. “Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: Evidence from eye tracking”. Cognition 133 (2014): 535-552.
Main File(s)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Last Uploaded
2014-11-14 08:04:43

This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

64 References

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data
Quené, Journal of Memory and Language 59(), 2008
Visual and linguistic processing during eye fixation in reading
Rayner, 2004
Much ado about eye movements to nothing: A response to Ferreira et al.: Taking a new look at looking at nothing
Richardson, Trend in Cognitive Sciences 13(), 2009
Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs
Richardson, Cognitive Science 27(), 2003
Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation.
Sedivy JC, Tanenhaus MK, Chambers CG, Carlson GN., Cognition 71(2), 1999
PMID: 10444906
Syntactic priming in comprehension: Parallelism effects with and without coordination
Sturt, Journal of Memory and Language 62(), 2010

Tabachnik, 2007
Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension.
Tanenhaus MK, Spivey-Knowlton MJ, Eberhard KM, Sedivy JC., Science 268(5217), 1995
PMID: 7777863
Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution
Traxler, Journal of Memory and Language 39(), 1998
Readers routinely represent implied object rotation: the role of visual experience.
Wassenburg SI, Zwaan RA., Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 63(9), 2010
PMID: 20845232
Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects.
Zwaan RA, Stanfield RA, Yaxley RH., Psychol Sci 13(2), 2002
PMID: 11934002

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Sources

PMID: 25215930
PubMed | Europe PMC

Search this title in

Google Scholar