Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution

Trockel W (2014)
Games and Economic Behavior 85: 32-36.

Journal Article | Published | English

No fulltext has been uploaded

Abstract
First via a counter example it is shown that Proposition 3 of Anbarci and Sun (2013) is false. Then a gap and a mistake in their proof are identified. Finally, a modified version of their Proposition 3 is stated and proved. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publishing Year
ISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Trockel W. Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution. Games and Economic Behavior. 2014;85:32-36.
Trockel, W. (2014). Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution. Games and Economic Behavior, 85, 32-36.
Trockel, W. (2014). Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution. Games and Economic Behavior 85, 32-36.
Trockel, W., 2014. Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution. Games and Economic Behavior, 85, p 32-36.
W. Trockel, “Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution”, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 85, 2014, pp. 32-36.
Trockel, W.: Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution. Games and Economic Behavior. 85, 32-36 (2014).
Trockel, Walter. “Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution”. Games and Economic Behavior 85 (2014): 32-36.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Search this title in

Google Scholar