Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution

Trockel W (2014)
Games and Economic Behavior 85: 32-36.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Abstract / Bemerkung
First via a counter example it is shown that Proposition 3 of Anbarci and Sun (2013) is false. Then a gap and a mistake in their proof are identified. Finally, a modified version of their Proposition 3 is stated and proved. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Games and Economic Behavior
Band
85
Seite
32-36
ISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Trockel W. Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution. Games and Economic Behavior. 2014;85:32-36.
Trockel, W. (2014). Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution. Games and Economic Behavior, 85, 32-36. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2013.12.012
Trockel, W. (2014). Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution. Games and Economic Behavior 85, 32-36.
Trockel, W., 2014. Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution. Games and Economic Behavior, 85, p 32-36.
W. Trockel, “Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution”, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 85, 2014, pp. 32-36.
Trockel, W.: Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution. Games and Economic Behavior. 85, 32-36 (2014).
Trockel, Walter. “Robustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solution”. Games and Economic Behavior 85 (2014): 32-36.