Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - Interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors

Seegelke C, Hughes C, Knoblauch A, Schack T (2013)
Acta Psychologica 144(3): 513-521.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Abstract / Bemerkung
The present study examined adaptations in the planning of initial grasp postures during a multi-segment object manipulation task. Participants performed a grasping and placing task that consisted of one, two, or three movement segments. The position of the targets was manipulated such that the degree of object rotation between the home and temporally proximal positions, and between the temporally proximal and distal target positions, varied. Participants selected initial grasp postures based on the specific requirements of the temporally proximal and temporally distal action segments, and adjustments in initial grasp posture depended on the temporal order of target location. In addition, during the initial stages of the experimental session initial grasp postures were influenced to a larger extent by the demands of the temporally proximal segment. However, over time, participants overcame these cognitive limitations and adjusted their initial grasp postures more strongly to the requirements of the temporally distal segment Taken together, these results indicate that grasp posture planning is influenced by cognitive and biomechanical factors, and that participants learn to anticipate the task demands of temporally distal task demands, which we hypothesize, reduce the burden on the central nervous system. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Acta Psychologica
Band
144
Zeitschriftennummer
3
Seite
513-521
ISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Seegelke C, Hughes C, Knoblauch A, Schack T. Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - Interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors. Acta Psychologica. 2013;144(3):513-521.
Seegelke, C., Hughes, C., Knoblauch, A., & Schack, T. (2013). Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - Interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors. Acta Psychologica, 144(3), 513-521. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.09.002
Seegelke, C., Hughes, C., Knoblauch, A., and Schack, T. (2013). Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - Interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors. Acta Psychologica 144, 513-521.
Seegelke, C., et al., 2013. Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - Interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors. Acta Psychologica, 144(3), p 513-521.
C. Seegelke, et al., “Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - Interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors”, Acta Psychologica, vol. 144, 2013, pp. 513-521.
Seegelke, C., Hughes, C., Knoblauch, A., Schack, T.: Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - Interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors. Acta Psychologica. 144, 513-521 (2013).
Seegelke, Christian, Hughes, Charmayne, Knoblauch, Andreas, and Schack, Thomas. “Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - Interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors”. Acta Psychologica 144.3 (2013): 513-521.

7 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Habit outweighs planning in grasp selection for object manipulation.
Herbort O, Mathew H, Kunde W., Cogn Psychol 92(), 2017
PMID: 27951435
Frames of reference in action plan recall: influence of hand and handedness.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Wunsch K, van der Wel R, Weigelt M., Exp Brain Res 233(10), 2015
PMID: 26070901
Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schack T., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 25566153

34 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping.
Ansuini C, Giosa L, Turella L, Altoe G, Castiello U., Exp Brain Res 185(1), 2007
PMID: 17909766
Effects of end-goal on hand shaping.
Ansuini C, Santello M, Massaccesi S, Castiello U., J. Neurophysiol. 95(4), 2005
PMID: 16381806
Categorization and validation of handedness using latent class analysis.
Dragovic M., Acta Neuropsychiatr 16(4), 2004
PMID: 26984309
Memory drum theory's C movement: revelations from Franklin Henry.
Fischman MG, Christina RW, Anson JG., Res Q Exerc Sport 79(3), 2008
PMID: 18816942
Planning of action sequences
Haggard, Acta Psychologica 99(), 1998
Increased response latency for complicated movements and a ‘memory drum’ theory of neuromotor reaction
Henry, Research Quarterly of the American Association for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation 31(), 1960
Planning and control of hand orientation in grasping movements.
Herbort O, Butz MV., Exp Brain Res 202(4), 2010
PMID: 20195848
Advance planning in sequential pick-and-place tasks.
Hesse C, Deubel H., J. Neurophysiol. 104(1), 2010
PMID: 20457862
On the rate of gain of information
Hick, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 4(), 1952
Goal-related planning constraints in bimanual grasping and placing of objects.
Hughes CM, Franz EA., Exp Brain Res 188(4), 2008
PMID: 18443769
Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.
Hughes CM, Haddad JM, Franz EA, Zelaznik HN, Ryu JH., Exp Brain Res 211(2), 2011
PMID: 21484393
Corrections in grasp posture in response to modifications of action goals.
Hughes CM, Seegelke C, Spiegel MA, Oehmichen C, Hammes J, Schack T., PLoS ONE 7(9), 2012
PMID: 22970119
Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.
HYMAN R., J Exp Psychol 45(3), 1953
PMID: 13052851

Jeannerod, 1997
Motor response programming during simple and choice reaction time: The role of practice
Klapp, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 21(), 1995
Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.
Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Jeannerod M, Athenes S, Dugas C., Can J Psychol 41(3), 1987
PMID: 3502905
Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips
Rosenbaum, 1990
From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect.
Rosenbaum DA, van Heugten CM, Caldwell GE., Acta Psychol (Amst) 94(1), 1996
PMID: 8885711
Time course of movement planning: selection of handgrips for object manipulation.
Rosenbaum DA, Vaughan J, Barnes HJ, Jorgensen MJ., J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 18(5), 1992
PMID: 1402710
Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
Seegelke C, Hughes CM, Schutz C, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 222(1-2), 2012
PMID: 22885998

Shepard, 1982
Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.
Shepard RN, Metzler J., Science 171(3972), 1971
PMID: 5540314
The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting
Sternberg, 1978
Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance.
van der Wel RP, Rosenbaum DA., Exp Brain Res 205(3), 2010
PMID: 20658129
A Fortran package for generalized, crossvalidatory spline smoothing and differentiation
Woltring, Advances in Engineering Software 8(), 1986

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 24095853
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar