Athletes and novices are differently capable to recognize feint and non-feint actions

Güldenpenning I, Steinke A, Koester D, Schack T (2013)
Experimental Brain Research 230(3): 333-343.

Download
No fulltext has been uploaded. References only!
Journal Article | Original Article | Published | English

No fulltext has been uploaded

Abstract / Notes
Fast motor reactions in sports often require the ability to predict the intended action of an opponent as early as possible. Therefore, the present paper investigates whether beach volleyball athletes are able to recognize different attack hits (i.e. smash vs. poke shot) at an earlier stage of the movement than novices. Beach volleyball athletes and novices took part in a response priming experiment (Experiment 1). Participants had to decide whether a presented target picture depicts a smash or a poke shot. Importantly, the preceding prime pictures were taken from different stages of the movements varying between the jump (beginning of the movements) and the hand-ball contact (end of the movements). Diverging response congruency effects was found for athletes and novices. Athletes were able to recognize at an earlier movement stage than novices which kind of attack hit was shown at the prime picture. It is suggested that athletes might implicitly read movement-related patterns in the depicted athlete's body posture (e.g. the angle of the elbow). In contrast, novices might use information which is easier to access (e.g. hand-ball relation). In a second experiment, novice participants received a visual training to test for a potential perceptual source of the priming effects. Notably, participants did not improve their ability to differentiate the volleyball techniques, indicating that a better recognition performance in athletes is based on motor and not on perceptual expertise.
Publishing Year
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Güldenpenning I, Steinke A, Koester D, Schack T. Athletes and novices are differently capable to recognize feint and non-feint actions. Experimental Brain Research. 2013;230(3):333-343.
Güldenpenning, I., Steinke, A., Koester, D., & Schack, T. (2013). Athletes and novices are differently capable to recognize feint and non-feint actions. Experimental Brain Research, 230(3), 333-343. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3658-2
Güldenpenning, I., Steinke, A., Koester, D., and Schack, T. (2013). Athletes and novices are differently capable to recognize feint and non-feint actions. Experimental Brain Research 230, 333-343.
Güldenpenning, I., et al., 2013. Athletes and novices are differently capable to recognize feint and non-feint actions. Experimental Brain Research, 230(3), p 333-343.
I. Güldenpenning, et al., “Athletes and novices are differently capable to recognize feint and non-feint actions”, Experimental Brain Research, vol. 230, 2013, pp. 333-343.
Güldenpenning, I., Steinke, A., Koester, D., Schack, T.: Athletes and novices are differently capable to recognize feint and non-feint actions. Experimental Brain Research. 230, 333-343 (2013).
Güldenpenning, Iris, Steinke, Andreas, Koester, Dirk, and Schack, Thomas. “Athletes and novices are differently capable to recognize feint and non-feint actions”. Experimental Brain Research 230.3 (2013): 333-343.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

10 Citations in Europe PMC

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Control over the processing of the opponent's gaze direction in basketball experts.
Weigelt M, Güldenpenning I, Steggemann-Weinrich Y, Alhaj Ahmad Alaboud M, Kunde W., Psychon Bull Rev 24(3), 2017
PMID: 27542803
How You Move Is What I See: Planning an Action Biases a Partner's Visual Search.
Dötsch D, Vesper C, Schubö A., Front Psychol 8(), 2017
PMID: 28223949
How to Trick Your Opponent: A Review Article on Deceptive Actions in Interactive Sports.
Güldenpenning I, Kunde W, Weigelt M., Front Psychol 8(), 2017
PMID: 28620336
Assessing experience in the deliberate practice of running using a fuzzy decision-support system.
Roveri MI, Manoel EJ, Onodera AN, Ortega NRS, Tessutti VD, Vilela E, Evêncio N, Sacco ICN., PLoS One 12(8), 2017
PMID: 28817655
Masked priming of complex movements: perceptual and motor processes in unconscious action perception.
Güldenpenning I, Braun JF, Machlitt D, Schack T., Psychol Res 79(5), 2015
PMID: 25187216
Mental representation and motor imagery training.
Schack T, Essig K, Frank C, Koester D., Front Hum Neurosci 8(), 2014
PMID: 24904368
Expertise affects representation structure and categorical activation of grasp postures in climbing.
Bläsing BE, Güldenpenning I, Koester D, Schack T., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 25309480
Effectiveness of the call in beach volleyball attacking play.
Künzell S, Schweikart F, Köhn D, Schläppi-Lienhard O., J Hum Kinet 44(), 2014
PMID: 25713679

32 References

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.


J, J Sport Sci 30(5), 2012
Prospective coding in event representation.
Schutz-Bosbach S, Prinz W., Cogn Process 8(2), 2007
PMID: 17406917
Detecting deception in a bluffing body: the role of expertise.
Sebanz N, Shiffrar M., Psychon Bull Rev 16(1), 2009
PMID: 19145029

J, J Motor Behav 37(2), 2005
Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system.
Urgesi C, Maieron M, Avenanti A, Tidoni E, Fabbro F, Aglioti SM., Cereb. Cortex 20(11), 2010
PMID: 20051359

AM, 2007
The dynamical information underpinning anticipation skill.
Mark Williams A, Huys R, Canal-Bruland R, Hagemann N., Hum Mov Sci 28(3), 2009
PMID: 19081648

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Sources

PMID: 23955103
PubMed | Europe PMC

Search this title in

Google Scholar