Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference?

Johannsen K, de Ruiter J (2013)
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 667.

Download
OA
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Volltext vorhanden für diesen Nachweis
Abstract / Bemerkung
We investigate effects of priming and preference on frame of reference (FOR) selection in dialog. In a first study, we determine FOR preferences for specific object configurations to establish a baseline. In a second study, we focus on the selection of the relative or the intrinsic FOR in dialog using the same stimuli and addressing the questions whether (a) interlocutors prime each other to use the same FOR consistently or (b) the preference for the intrinsic FOR predominates priming effects. Our results show effects of priming (more use of the relative FOR) and a decreased preference for the intrinsic FOR. However, as FOR selection did not have an effect on target trial accuracy, neither effect alone represents the key to successful communication in this domain. Rather, we found that successful communication depended on the adaptation of strategies between interlocutors: the more the interlocutors adapted to each other’s strategies, the more successful they were.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Band
7
Seite
667
ISSN
eISSN
Finanzierungs-Informationen
Article Processing Charge funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University.
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Johannsen K, de Ruiter J. Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013;7:667.
Johannsen, K., & de Ruiter, J. (2013). Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 667. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00667
Johannsen, K., and de Ruiter, J. (2013). Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7, 667.
Johannsen, K., & de Ruiter, J., 2013. Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, p 667.
K. Johannsen and J. de Ruiter, “Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference?”, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 7, 2013, pp. 667.
Johannsen, K., de Ruiter, J.: Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7, 667 (2013).
Johannsen, Katrin, and de Ruiter, Jan. “Reference frame selection in dialogue: priming or preference?”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 (2013): 667.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Copyright Statement:
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. [...]
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2013-11-18T13:10:13Z

1 Zitation in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Perspective taking: building a neurocognitive framework for integrating the "social" and the "spatial".
Hamilton AF, Kessler K, Creem-Regehr SH., Front Hum Neurosci 8(), 2014
PMID: 24966824

39 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-39.
Bates D., Maechler M., Boker B.., 2011
Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.
Brennan SE, Clark HH., J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22(6), 1996
PMID: 8921603
“Von dir aus⋯”. Zur hörerbezogenen Referenz. Bericht Nr. 10, Arbeiten der Forschergruppe “Sprechen und Sprachverstehen im sozialen Kontext”, Heidelberg/Mannheim.
Bürkle B., Nirmaier H., Herrmann T.., 1986
Selecting a reference frame.
Carlson L.., 1999
Frames of reference in vision and language: where is above?
Carlson-Radvansky LA, Irwin DE., Cognition 46(3), 1993
PMID: 8462273
The influence of functional relations on spatial term selection.
Carlson-Radvansky L., Radvansky G.., 1996

Clark H.., 1996
Listeners invest in an assumed other's perspective despite cognitive cost.
Duran ND, Dale R, Kreuz RJ., Cognition 121(1), 2011
PMID: 21752357
Searching imagined environments.
Franklin N., Tversky B.., 1990
Spatial reference in weightlessness: perceptual factors and mental representations.
Friederici AD, Levelt WJ., Percept Psychophys 47(3), 1990
PMID: 2326148
The conversational partner's perspective affects spatial memory and descriptions.
Galati M., Michael C., Mello C., Greenauer N., Avraamides M.., 2013
Factors affecting the use of dimensional prepositions in German and American English: object orientation, social context, and prepositional pattern.
Grabowski J., Miller G.., 2000
Zur sekundären Raumreferenz: Gegenüberobjekte bei nicht-kanonischer Betrachterposition. Bericht Nr. 11, Arbeiten aus dem Sonderforschungsbereich 245 “Sprechen und Sprachverstehen im sozialen Kontext”
Graf R., Herrmann T.., 1989
“Logic and conversation,” in
Grice H.., 1975
Do speakers avoid ambiguities during dialogue?
Haywood SL, Pickering MJ, Branigan HP., Psychol Sci 16(5), 2005
PMID: 15869694
Partnerbezogene Objektlokalisation – ein neues sprachpsychologisches Forschungsthema. Arbeiten der Forschergruppe “Sprechen und Sprachverstehen im sozialen Kontext”, Bericht Nr.
Herrmann T.., 1988
“Cognitive styles in the use of spatial direction terms,” in
Levelt W.., 1982
Speaking: From Intentions to Articulation.
Levelt W.., 1989
“Some perceptual limitations on talking about space,” in
Levelt W.., 1984
“Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: crosslinguistic evidence,” in
Levinson S.., 1996

Levinson S.., 2003
Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought.
Linde C., Labov W.., 1975
“A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations,” in
Logan G., Sadler D.., 1996
Language and Perception.
Miller G., Johnson-Laird P.., 1976
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.
Pickering MJ, Garrod S., Behav Brain Sci 27(2), 2004
PMID: 15595235
Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects, and with binomial data.
Quené H., van H.., 2008
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2013
Spatial perspective-taking in conversation.
Schober MF., Cognition 47(1), 1993
PMID: 8482069
“Could you hand me those keys on the right?” Disentangling spatial reference frames using different methodologies.
Taylor H., Naylor S., Faust R., Holcomb P.., 1999
“Spatial perspective in descriptions,” in
Tversky B.., 1996
“Alignment of reference frames in dialogue,” in
Watson M., Pickering M., Branigan H.., 2004
“An empirical investigation into spatial reference frame taxonomy using dialogue,” in
Watson M., Pickering M., Branigan H.., 2006
Exploiting spatial descriptions in visual scene analysis.
Ziegler L, Johannsen K, Swadzba A, De Ruiter JP, Wachsmuth S., Cogn Process 13 Suppl 1(), 2012
PMID: 22806654

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 24137122
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar