# Dichotomising continuous data while retaining statistical power using a distributional approach

Peacock JL, Sauzet O, Ewings SM, Kerry SM (2012)

Statistics In Medicine 31(26): 3089-3103.

DOI

*Journal Article*|

*Published*|

*English*

No fulltext has been uploaded

Author

Department

Abstract

Dichotomisation of continuous data is known to be hugely problematic because information is lost, power is reduced and relationships may be obscured or changed. However, not only are differences in means difficult for clinicians to interpret, but thresholds also occur in many areas of medical practice and cannot be ignored. In recognition of both the problems of dichotomisation and the ways in which it may be useful clinically, we have used a distributional approach to derive a difference in proportions with a 95% CI that retains the precision and the power of the CI for the equivalent difference in means. In this way, we propose a dual approach that analyses continuous data using both means and proportions to replace dichotomisation alone and that may be useful in certain situations. We illustrate this work with examples and simulations that show good performance of the parametric approach under standard distributional assumptions from our own research and from the literature. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

Publishing Year

ISSN

PUB-ID

### Cite this

Peacock JL, Sauzet O, Ewings SM, Kerry SM. Dichotomising continuous data while retaining statistical power using a distributional approach.

*Statistics In Medicine*. 2012;31(26):3089-3103.Peacock, J. L., Sauzet, O., Ewings, S. M., & Kerry, S. M. (2012). Dichotomising continuous data while retaining statistical power using a distributional approach.

*Statistics In Medicine*,*31*(26), 3089-3103.Peacock, J. L., Sauzet, O., Ewings, S. M., and Kerry, S. M. (2012). Dichotomising continuous data while retaining statistical power using a distributional approach.

*Statistics In Medicine*31, 3089-3103.Peacock, J.L., et al., 2012. Dichotomising continuous data while retaining statistical power using a distributional approach.

*Statistics In Medicine*, 31(26), p 3089-3103.J.L. Peacock, et al., “Dichotomising continuous data while retaining statistical power using a distributional approach”,

*Statistics In Medicine*, vol. 31, 2012, pp. 3089-3103.Peacock, J.L., Sauzet, O., Ewings, S.M., Kerry, S.M.: Dichotomising continuous data while retaining statistical power using a distributional approach. Statistics In Medicine. 31, 3089-3103 (2012).

Peacock, J. L., Sauzet, Odile, Ewings, S. M., and Kerry, S. M. “Dichotomising continuous data while retaining statistical power using a distributional approach”.

*Statistics In Medicine*31.26 (2012): 3089-3103.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:

This publication cites the following data publications:

### 8 Citations in Europe PMC

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Making core outcomes more clinically meaningful: 2-for-the-price-of-1 with a distributional approach.

Peacock JL, Lo JW, Sauzet O.,

PMID: PMC4460927

Peacock JL, Lo JW, Sauzet O.,

*Trials*16(Suppl 1), 2015PMID: PMC4460927

Dichotomisation using a distributional approach when the outcome is skewed.

Sauzet O, Ofuya M, Peacock JL.,

PMID: 25902850

Sauzet O, Ofuya M, Peacock JL.,

*BMC Med Res Methodol*15(), 2015PMID: 25902850

Estimation of intervention effect using paired interval-censored data with clumping below lower detection limit.

Xu Y, Lam KF, Cowling BJ, Cheung YB.,

PMID: 25345814

Xu Y, Lam KF, Cowling BJ, Cheung YB.,

*Stat Med*34(2), 2015PMID: 25345814

The interaction between anxiety and depressive symptoms on brachial artery reactivity in cardiac patients.

Mercer DA, Lavoie KL, Ditto B, Pelletier R, Campbell T, Arsenault A, Bacon SL.,

PMID: 25058195

Mercer DA, Lavoie KL, Ditto B, Pelletier R, Campbell T, Arsenault A, Bacon SL.,

*Biol Psychol*102(), 2014PMID: 25058195

Estimating dichotomised outcomes in two groups with unequal variances: a distributional approach.

Sauzet O, Peacock JL.,

PMID: 24989698

Sauzet O, Peacock JL.,

*Stat Med*33(26), 2014PMID: 24989698

Dichotomisation of a continuous outcome and effect on meta-analyses: illustration of the distributional approach using the outcome birthweight.

Ofuya M, Sauzet O, Peacock JL.,

PMID: 24920271

Ofuya M, Sauzet O, Peacock JL.,

*Syst Rev*3(), 2014PMID: 24920271

On responder analyses in the framework of within subject comparisons - considerations and two case studies.

Kunz M.,

PMID: 24652819

Kunz M.,

*Stat Med*33(17), 2014PMID: 24652819

Late outcomes of a randomized trial of high-frequency oscillation in neonates.

Zivanovic S, Peacock J, Alcazar-Paris M, Lo JW, Lunt A, Marlow N, Calvert S, Greenough A; United Kingdom Oscillation Study Group, Zivanovic S, Peacock J, Alcazar-Paris M, Lo JW, Marlow N, Calvert S, Greenough A, Halliday H, Henderson J, Cunningham S, Vyas H, Kerry S, Dromgoole J, Coker B, Oedra R, Thomas F, D'eath T, Nguyen J, Lovestone J.,

PMID: 24645944

Zivanovic S, Peacock J, Alcazar-Paris M, Lo JW, Lunt A, Marlow N, Calvert S, Greenough A; United Kingdom Oscillation Study Group, Zivanovic S, Peacock J, Alcazar-Paris M, Lo JW, Marlow N, Calvert S, Greenough A, Halliday H, Henderson J, Cunningham S, Vyas H, Kerry S, Dromgoole J, Coker B, Oedra R, Thomas F, D'eath T, Nguyen J, Lovestone J.,

*N. Engl. J. Med.*370(12), 2014PMID: 24645944

### 22 References

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Disappointing dichotomies

Senn,

Senn,

*Pharmaceutical Statistics*2(4), 2003
The cost of dichotomising continuous variables.

Altman DG, Royston P.,

PMID: 16675816

Altman DG, Royston P.,

*BMJ*332(7549), 2006PMID: 16675816

Dichotomizing continuous outcome variables: dependence of the magnitude of association and statistical power on the cutpoint.

Ragland DR.,

PMID: 1391136

Ragland DR.,

*Epidemiology*3(5), 1992PMID: 1391136

Power considerations when a continuous outcome variable is dichotomized.

Deyi BA, Kosinski AS, Snapinn SM.,

PMID: 9598427

Deyi BA, Kosinski AS, Snapinn SM.,

*J Biopharm Stat*8(2), 1998PMID: 9598427

Consequences of dichotomization.

Fedorov V, Mannino F, Zhang R.,

PMID: 18389492

Fedorov V, Mannino F, Zhang R.,

*Pharm Stat*8(1), 2009PMID: 18389492

Measurement in clinical trials: a neglected issue for statisticians?

Senn S, Julious S.,

PMID: 19455540

Senn S, Julious S.,

*Stat Med*28(26), 2009PMID: 19455540

The impact of dichotomization on the efficiency of testing for an interaction effect in exponential family models

Farewell,

Farewell,

*Journal of the American Statistical Association*99(467), 2004
Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea.

Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W.,

PMID: 16217841

Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W.,

*Stat Med*25(1), 2006PMID: 16217841

Breaking up is hard to do: the heartbreak of dichotomizing continuous data.

Streiner DL.,

PMID: 11987478

Streiner DL.,

*Can J Psychiatry*47(3), 2002PMID: 11987478

Binary methods for continuous outcomes: a parametric alternative.

Suissa S.,

PMID: 1999683

Suissa S.,

*J Clin Epidemiol*44(3), 1991PMID: 1999683

An efficient test for the analysis of dichotomized variables when the reliability is known.

Borm GF, Munneke M, Lemmers O, van Zuijlen M.,

PMID: 16981185

Borm GF, Munneke M, Lemmers O, van Zuijlen M.,

*Stat Med*26(18), 2007PMID: 16981185

A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis.

Chinn S.,

PMID: 11113947

Chinn S.,

*Stat Med*19(22), 2000PMID: 11113947

Odds ratios for a continuous outcome variable without dichotomizing.

Moser BK, Coombs LP.,

PMID: 15195319

Moser BK, Coombs LP.,

*Stat Med*23(12), 2004PMID: 15195319

U is for unease: reasons for mistrusting overlap measures for reporting clinical trials

Senn,

Senn,

*Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research*3(2), 2011Casella, 1990

A simple approximation for calculating sample sizes for comparing independent proportions

Fleiss,

Fleiss,

*Biometrics*36(2), 1980Julious, 2009

Maternal cotinine level during pregnancy and birthweight for gestational age.

Peacock JL, Cook DG, Carey IM, Jarvis MJ, Bryant AE, Anderson HR, Bland JM.,

PMID: 9758120

Peacock JL, Cook DG, Carey IM, Jarvis MJ, Bryant AE, Anderson HR, Bland JM.,

*Int J Epidemiol*27(4), 1998PMID: 9758120

Prematurity and low birth weight among Brazilian adolescents and young adults.

Rocha RC, de Souza E, Soares EP, Nogueira ES, Chambo Filho A, Guazzelli CA.,

PMID: 19822446

Rocha RC, de Souza E, Soares EP, Nogueira ES, Chambo Filho A, Guazzelli CA.,

*J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol*23(3), 2010PMID: 19822446

No increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with urinary tract infections: a nationwide population-based study.

Chen YK, Chen SF, Li HC, Lin HC.,

PMID: 20583933

Chen YK, Chen SF, Li HC, Lin HC.,

*Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand*89(7), 2010PMID: 20583933

Substance abuse during pregnancy: effect on pregnancy outcomes.

Pinto SM, Dodd S, Walkinshaw SA, Siney C, Kakkar P, Mousa HA.,

PMID: 20227162

Pinto SM, Dodd S, Walkinshaw SA, Siney C, Kakkar P, Mousa HA.,

*Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.*150(2), 2010PMID: 20227162

### Export

0 Marked Publications### Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®### Sources

PMID: 22865598

PubMed | Europe PMC