Action-effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions

Herwig A, Waszak F (2012)
Frontiers in Psychology 3(444): 1-18.

Download
OA
Journal Article | Published | English
Author
;
Abstract
According to ideomotor theory, action-effect associations are crucial for voluntary action control. Recently, a number of studies started to investigate the conditions that mediate the acquisition and application of action-effect associations by comparing actions carried out in response to exogenous stimuli (stimulus-based) with actions selected endogenously (intention-based). There is evidence that the acquisition and/or application of action-effect associations is boosted when acting in an intention-based action mode. For instance, bidirectional action-effect associations were diagnosed in a forced choice test phase if participants previously experienced action-effect couplings in an intention-based but not in a stimulus-based action mode. The present study aims at investigating effects of the action mode on action-effect associations in more detail. In a series of experiments, we compared the strength and durability of short-term action-effect associations (binding) immediately following intention- as well as stimulus-based actions. Moreover, long-term action-effect associations (learning) were assessed in a subsequent test phase. Our results show short-term action-effect associations of equal strength and durability for both action modes. However, replicating previous results, long-term associations were observed only following intention-based actions. These findings indicate that the effect of the action mode on long-term associations cannot merely be a result of accumulated short-term action-effect bindings. Instead, only those episodic bindings are selectively perpetuated or retrieved that integrate action-relevant aspects of the processing event, i.e., in case of intention-based actions, the link between action and ensuing effect.
Publishing Year
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Herwig A, Waszak F. Action-effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions. Frontiers in Psychology. 2012;3(444):1-18.
Herwig, A., & Waszak, F. (2012). Action-effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(444), 1-18.
Herwig, A., and Waszak, F. (2012). Action-effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions. Frontiers in Psychology 3, 1-18.
Herwig, A., & Waszak, F., 2012. Action-effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(444), p 1-18.
A. Herwig and F. Waszak, “Action-effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions”, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 3, 2012, pp. 1-18.
Herwig, A., Waszak, F.: Action-effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions. Frontiers in Psychology. 3, 1-18 (2012).
Herwig, Arvid, and Waszak, Florian. “Action-effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions”. Frontiers in Psychology 3.444 (2012): 1-18.
Main File(s)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Last Uploaded
2012-11-26 10:34:00

This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

17 Citations in Europe PMC

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

On the durability of bindings between responses and response-irrelevant stimuli.
Frings C, Moeller B, Horner AJ., Acta Psychol (Amst) 161(), 2015
PMID: 26340042
Influence of action-effect associations acquired by ideomotor learning on imitation.
Bunlon F, Marshall PJ, Quandt LC, Bouquet CA., PLoS ONE 10(3), 2015
PMID: 25793755
No differences in dual-task costs between forced- and free-choice tasks.
Janczyk M, Nolden S, Jolicoeur P., Psychol Res 79(3), 2015
PMID: 24947757
The benefit of no choice: goal-directed plans enhance perceptual processing.
Janczyk M, Dambacher M, Bieleke M, Gollwitzer PM., Psychol Res 79(2), 2015
PMID: 24619532
Expectation mismatch: differences between self-generated and cue-induced expectations.
Gaschler R, Schwager S, Umbach VJ, Frensch PA, Schubert T., Neurosci Biobehav Rev 46 Pt 1(), 2014
PMID: 24971824
Neural correlates of ideomotor effect anticipations.
Pfister R, Melcher T, Kiesel A, Dechent P, Gruber O., Neuroscience 259(), 2014
PMID: 24333210
Editorial: Action effects in perception and action.
Pfister R, Janczyk M, Kunde W., Front Psychol 4(), 2013
PMID: 23653609
Working memory and its relation to deterministic sequence learning.
Martini M, Furtner MR, Sachse P., PLoS ONE 8(2), 2013
PMID: 23409148
Instructed task demands and utilization of action effect anticipation.
Gaschler R, Nattkemper D., Front Psychol 3(), 2012
PMID: 23431066
What I Say is What I Get: Stronger Effects of Self-Generated vs. Cue-Induced Expectations in Event-Related Potentials.
Kemper M, Umbach VJ, Schwager S, Gaschler R, Frensch PA, Sturmer B., Front Psychol 3(), 2012
PMID: 23403896

6 References

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions.
Herwig A, Prinz W, Waszak F., Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 60(11), 2007
PMID: 17853217
Intention and attention in ideomotor learning.
Herwig A, Waszak F., Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 62(2), 2009
PMID: 18932052
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.
Loftus GR, Masson ME., Psychon Bull Rev 1(4), 1994
PMID: 24203555
Harleß' Apparatus of Will: 150 years later.
Pfister R, Janczyk M., Psychol Res 76(5), 2012
PMID: 21748464
On the timescale of stimulus-based action-effect learning.
Wolfensteller U, Ruge H., Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 64(7), 2011
PMID: 21416458

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Sources

PMID: 23112785
PubMed | Europe PMC

Search this title in

Google Scholar