# Stable unstable reliability theory

Thomas H, Lohaus A, Domsch H (2012)

British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 65(2): 201-221.

*Journal Article*|

*Published*|

*English*

No fulltext has been uploaded

Author

Abstract

Classical reliability theory assumes that individuals have identical true scores on both testing occasions, a condition described as stable. If some individuals true scores are different on different testing occasions, described as unstable, the estimated reliability can be misleading. A model called stable unstable reliability theory (SURT) frames stability or instability as an empirically testable question. SURT assumes a mixed population of stable and unstable individuals in unknown proportions, with wi the probability that individual i is stable. wi becomes is test score weight which is used to form a weighted correlation coefficient rw which is reliability under SURT. If all wi= 1 then rw is the classical reliability coefficient; thus classical theory is a special case of SURT. Typically rw is larger than the conventional reliability r, and confidence intervals on true scores are typically shorter than conventional intervals. rw is computed with routines in a publicly available R package.

Publishing Year

ISSN

PUB-ID

### Cite this

Thomas H, Lohaus A, Domsch H. Stable unstable reliability theory.

*British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology*. 2012;65(2):201-221.Thomas, H., Lohaus, A., & Domsch, H. (2012). Stable unstable reliability theory.

*British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology*,*65*(2), 201-221.Thomas, H., Lohaus, A., and Domsch, H. (2012). Stable unstable reliability theory.

*British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology*65, 201-221.Thomas, H., Lohaus, A., & Domsch, H., 2012. Stable unstable reliability theory.

*British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology*, 65(2), p 201-221.H. Thomas, A. Lohaus, and H. Domsch, “Stable unstable reliability theory”,

*British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology*, vol. 65, 2012, pp. 201-221.Thomas, H., Lohaus, A., Domsch, H.: Stable unstable reliability theory. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 65, 201-221 (2012).

Thomas, Hoben, Lohaus, Arnold, and Domsch, Holger. “Stable unstable reliability theory”.

*British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology*65.2 (2012): 201-221.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:

This publication cites the following data publications:

### 43 References

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Miller, 1942

Muthén, 2010

Test-retest reliability of a sexual behavior interview for men residing in Brazil, Mexico, and the United States: the HPV in Men (HIM) Study.

Nyitray AG, Kim J, Hsu CH, Papenfuss M, Villa L, Lazcano-Ponce E, Giuliano AR.,

PMID: 19741044

Nyitray AG, Kim J, Hsu CH, Papenfuss M, Villa L, Lazcano-Ponce E, Giuliano AR.,

*Am. J. Epidemiol.*170(8), 2009PMID: 19741044

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Test-retest reliability of the Donovan spinal cord injury pain classification scheme.

Putzke JD, Richards JS, Ness T, Kezar L.,

PMID: 12669088

Putzke JD, Richards JS, Ness T, Kezar L.,

*Spinal Cord*41(4), 2003PMID: 12669088

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Measurement error in psychological research: Lessons from 26 research scenarios

Schmidt,

Schmidt,

*Psychological Methods*1(), 1996
General intelligence objectively defined and measured

Spearman,

Spearman,

*American Journal of Psychology*5(), 1904
Correlation calculated from faulty data

Spearman,

Spearman,

*British Journal of Psychology*3(), 1910
Modeling true intraindividual change. True-change as a latent variable

Steyer,

Steyer,

*Methods of Psychological Research Online*2(), 1997
A model for interpreting genetic correlations with estimates of parameters.

Thomas H.,

PMID: 1187904

Thomas H.,

*Psychol Bull*82(5), 1975PMID: 1187904

Titterington, 1985

Reliability and behavior domain validity: reformulation and historical critique.

TRYON RC.,

PMID: 13441849

TRYON RC.,

*Psychol Bull*54(3), 1957PMID: 13441849

Test-retest reliability of the Food Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaires (FAQLQ) for children, adolescents and adults.

van der Velde JL, Flokstra-de Blok BM, Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Oude Elberink JN, Schouten JP, Dunngalvin A, Hourihane JO, Duiverman EJ, Dubois AE.,

PMID: 19142745

van der Velde JL, Flokstra-de Blok BM, Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Oude Elberink JN, Schouten JP, Dunngalvin A, Hourihane JO, Duiverman EJ, Dubois AE.,

*Qual Life Res*18(2), 2009PMID: 19142745

The true-change model with individual method effects: reliability issues.

Vautier S, Steyer R, Boomsma A.,

PMID: 17535486

Vautier S, Steyer R, Boomsma A.,

*Br J Math Stat Psychol*61(Pt 2), 2008PMID: 17535486

Do balanced scales assess bipolar constructs? The case of the STAI scales.

Vautier S, Pohl S.,

PMID: 19485673

Vautier S, Pohl S.,

*Psychol Assess*21(2), 2009PMID: 19485673

The estimation of measurement error in panel data

Wiley,

Wiley,

*American Sociological Review*35(), 1970Yule, 1932

### Export

0 Marked Publications### Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®### Sources

PMID: 22500569

PubMed | Europe PMC