A comment on "Egalitarianism and efficiency in repeated symmetric games"

Kuzmics C, Rogers B (2012)
Games and Economic Behavior 74(1): 240-242.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
;
Abstract / Bemerkung
We identify an error in Bhaskar's (2000) Proposition 4. We provide counterexamples to this result and demonstrate that it is not correctable. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Games and Economic Behavior
Band
74
Zeitschriftennummer
1
Seite
240-242
ISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Kuzmics C, Rogers B. A comment on "Egalitarianism and efficiency in repeated symmetric games". Games and Economic Behavior. 2012;74(1):240-242.
Kuzmics, C., & Rogers, B. (2012). A comment on "Egalitarianism and efficiency in repeated symmetric games". Games and Economic Behavior, 74(1), 240-242. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2011.05.001
Kuzmics, C., and Rogers, B. (2012). A comment on "Egalitarianism and efficiency in repeated symmetric games". Games and Economic Behavior 74, 240-242.
Kuzmics, C., & Rogers, B., 2012. A comment on "Egalitarianism and efficiency in repeated symmetric games". Games and Economic Behavior, 74(1), p 240-242.
C. Kuzmics and B. Rogers, “A comment on "Egalitarianism and efficiency in repeated symmetric games"”, Games and Economic Behavior, vol. 74, 2012, pp. 240-242.
Kuzmics, C., Rogers, B.: A comment on "Egalitarianism and efficiency in repeated symmetric games". Games and Economic Behavior. 74, 240-242 (2012).
Kuzmics, Christoph, and Rogers, Brian. “A comment on "Egalitarianism and efficiency in repeated symmetric games"”. Games and Economic Behavior 74.1 (2012): 240-242.