Preferential inspection of recent real-world events over future events: evidence from eye tracking during spoken sentence comprehension

Knoeferle P, Carminati MN, Abashidze D, Essig K (2011)
Frontiers in Psychology 2(376): 1-12.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Abstract / Bemerkung
Eye-tracking findings suggest people prefer to ground their spoken language comprehen- sion by focusing on recently seen events more than anticipating future events: When the verb in NP1-VERB-ADV-NP2 sentences was referentially ambiguous between a recently depicted and an equally plausible future clipart action, listeners fixated the target of the recent action more often at the verb than the object that hadn’t yet been acted upon. We examined whether this inspection preference generalizes to real-world events, and whether it is (vs. isn’t) modulated by how often people see recent and future events acted out. In a first eye-tracking study, the experimenter performed an action (e.g., sugaring pancakes), and then a spoken sentence either referred to that action or to an equally plau- sible future action (e.g., sugaring strawberries). At the verb, people more often inspected the pancakes (the recent target) than the strawberries (the future target), thus replicat- ing the recent-event preference with these real-world actions. Adverb tense, indicating a future versus past event, had no effect on participants’ visual attention. In a second study we increased the frequency of future actions such that participants saw 50/50 future and recent actions. During the verb people mostly inspected the recent action target, but subse- quently they began to rely on tense, and anticipated the future target more often for future than past tense adverbs. A corpus study showed that the verbs and adverbs indicating past versus future actions were equally frequent, suggesting long-term frequency biases did not cause the recent-event preference. Thus, (a) recent real-world actions can rapidly influence comprehension (as indexed by eye gaze to objects), and (b) people prefer to first inspect a recent action target (vs. an object that will soon be acted upon), even when past and future actions occur with equal frequency. A simple frequency-of-experience account cannot accommodate these findings.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Frontiers in Psychology
Band
2
Zeitschriftennummer
376
Seite
1-12
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Knoeferle P, Carminati MN, Abashidze D, Essig K. Preferential inspection of recent real-world events over future events: evidence from eye tracking during spoken sentence comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology. 2011;2(376):1-12.
Knoeferle, P., Carminati, M. N., Abashidze, D., & Essig, K. (2011). Preferential inspection of recent real-world events over future events: evidence from eye tracking during spoken sentence comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(376), 1-12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00376
Knoeferle, P., Carminati, M. N., Abashidze, D., and Essig, K. (2011). Preferential inspection of recent real-world events over future events: evidence from eye tracking during spoken sentence comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 2, 1-12.
Knoeferle, P., et al., 2011. Preferential inspection of recent real-world events over future events: evidence from eye tracking during spoken sentence comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(376), p 1-12.
P. Knoeferle, et al., “Preferential inspection of recent real-world events over future events: evidence from eye tracking during spoken sentence comprehension”, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 2, 2011, pp. 1-12.
Knoeferle, P., Carminati, M.N., Abashidze, D., Essig, K.: Preferential inspection of recent real-world events over future events: evidence from eye tracking during spoken sentence comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology. 2, 1-12 (2011).
Knoeferle, Pia, Carminati, Maria Nella, Abashidze, Dato, and Essig, Kai. “Preferential inspection of recent real-world events over future events: evidence from eye tracking during spoken sentence comprehension”. Frontiers in Psychology 2.376 (2011): 1-12.

4 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Losing track of time? Processing of time reference inflection in agrammatic and healthy speakers of German.
Bos LS, Hanne S, Wartenburger I, Bastiaanse R., Neuropsychologia 65(), 2014
PMID: 25447377
Interfaces between language and cognition.
Myachykov A, Scheepers C, Shtyrov YY., Front Psychol 4(), 2013
PMID: 23653620

54 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Sources of contextual constraint upon words in sentences.
ABORN M, RUBENSTEIN H, STERLING TD., J Exp Psychol 57(3), 1959
PMID: 13641589
Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players.
Aglioti SM, Cesari P, Romani M, Urgesi C., Nat. Neurosci. 11(9), 2008
PMID: 19160510
Rule learning by seven-month-old infants and neural networks
Altmann G., Dienes Z.., 1999
Incrementality and Prediction in Human Sentence Processing.
Altmann GT, Mirkovic J., Cogn Sci 33(4), 2009
PMID: 20396405
Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension.
Arai M, van Gompel RP, Scheepers C., Cogn Psychol 54(3), 2006
PMID: 16973144

Baayen R.., 2008

Baayen R., Pipenbrock R., Gulikers L.., 1995
The waCky wide web: a collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora
Baroni M., Bernardini S., Ferraresi A., Zanchetta E.., 2009
Analyzing “visual world” eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression
Barr D.., 2008
Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.
Van Berkum JJ, Brown CM, Zwitserlood P, Kooijman V, Hagoort P., J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31(3), 2005
PMID: 15910130
Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina.
Berry MJ 2nd, Brivanlou IH, Jordan TA, Meister M., Nature 398(6725), 1999
PMID: 10192333
Syntactic priming in comprehension: the role of argument order and animacy.
Carminati MN, van Gompel RP, Scheepers C, Arai M., J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34(5), 2008
PMID: 18763894
Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution.
Chambers CG, Tanenhaus MK, Magnuson JS., J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30(3), 2004
PMID: 15099136
Reaching for the unknown: multiple target encoding and real-time decision-making in a rapid reach task.
Chapman CS, Gallivan JP, Wood DK, Milne JL, Culham JC, Goodale MA., Cognition 116(2), 2010
PMID: 20471007
Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation
Chun M., Jiang Y.., 1999
Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: evidence from eye movements.
Dahan D, Magnuson JS, Tanenhaus MK., Cogn Psychol 42(4), 2001
PMID: 11368527
Finding structure in time
Elman J.., 1990
Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition
Fischler I., Bloom P.., 1979
The information conveyed by words in sentences.
Hale J., J Psycholinguist Res 32(2), 2003
PMID: 12690827
Experience and grammatical agreement: statistical learning shapes number agreement production.
Haskell TR, Thornton R, Macdonald MC., Cognition 114(2), 2009
PMID: 19942213
dlexdb – eine lexikalische datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische forschung
Heister J., Würzner K.-M., Bubenzer J., Pohl E., Hanneforth T., Geyken A., Kliegl R.., 2011
Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: a review and critical evaluation.
Huettig F, Rommers J, Meyer AS., Acta Psychol (Amst) 137(2), 2011
PMID: 21288498
“Language-mediated prediction is related to reading ability and formal literacy,”
Huettig F., Singh N., Singh S., Mishra R.., 2011
The time course of prediction in incremental sentence processing
Kamide Y., Altmann G., Haywood S.., 2003
Recent experience affects the strength of structural priming.
Kaschak MP, Loney RA, Borreggine KL., Cognition 99(3), 2005
PMID: 16115618
The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: evidence from eye-movements
Knoeferle P., Crocker M.., 2007
“Europarl: a parallel corpus for statistical machine translation,”
Koehn P.., 2005
“The German reference corpus DeReKo: a primordial sample for linguistic research,”
Kupietz M., Belica C., Keibel H., Witt A.., 2010
Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.
Levy R., Cognition 106(3), 2007
PMID: 17662975
Is the cerebellum a smith predictor?
Miall RC, Weir DJ, Wolpert DM, Stein JF., J Mot Behav 25(3), 1993
PMID: 12581990
HIV in infected lymph nodes.
Fox CH, Hoover S, Currall VR, Bahre HJ, Cottler-Fox M., Nature 370(6487), 1994
PMID: 8035872
The preview search task: evidence for visual marking
Olivers C., Humphreys G., Braithwaite J.., 2006
Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension?
Pickering MJ, Garrod S., Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 11(3), 2007
PMID: 17254833
Eye-movement control in reading and visual search: effects of word frequency
Rayner K., Raney G.., 1996

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 2008
Statistical language learning: mechanisms and constraints
Saffran J.., 2003
Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants.
Saffran JR, Aslin RN, Newport EL., Science 274(5294), 1996
PMID: 8943209
Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation.
Sedivy JC, Tanenhaus MK, Chambers CG, Carlson GN., Cognition 71(2), 1999
PMID: 10444906
“Annotation by category – ELAN and ISO DCR,”
Sloetjes H., Wittenburg P.., 2008
Experience and sentence processing: statistical learning and relative clause comprehension
Wells J., Christiansen M., Race D., Acheson D., MacDonald M.., 2009
An internal model for sensorimotor integration.
Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI., Science 269(5232), 1995
PMID: 7569931
Event perception: a mind-brain perspective.
Zacks JM, Speer NK, Swallow KM, Braver TS, Reynolds JR., Psychol Bull 133(2), 2007
PMID: 17338600

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 22207858
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar