Breeding state and season affect interspecific interaction types: indirect resource competition and direct interference

Eccard JA, Fey K, Caspers B, Ylonen H (2011)
Oecologia 167(3): 623-633.

Journal Article | Published | English

No fulltext has been uploaded

Author
; ; ;
Abstract
Indirect resource competition and interference are widely occurring mechanisms of interspecific interactions. We have studied the seasonal expression of these two interaction types within a two-species, boreal small mammal system. Seasons differ by resource availability, individual breeding state and intraspecific social system. Live-trapping methods were used to monitor space use and reproduction in 14 experimental populations of bank voles Myodes glareolus in large outdoor enclosures with and without a dominant competitor, the field vole Microtus agrestis. We further compared vole behaviour using staged dyadic encounters in neutral arenas in both seasons. Survival of the non-breeding overwintering bank voles was not affected by competition. In the spring, the numbers of male bank voles, but not of females, were reduced significantly in the competition populations. Bank vole home ranges expanded with vole density in the presence of competitors, indicating food limitation. A comparison of behaviour between seasons based on an analysis of similarity revealed an avoidance of costly aggression against opponents, independent of species. Interactions were more aggressive during the summer than during the winter, and heterospecific encounters were more aggressive than conspecific encounters. Based on these results, we suggest that interaction types and their respective mechanisms are not either-or categories and may change over the seasons. During the winter, energy constraints and thermoregulatory needs decrease direct aggression, but food constraints increase indirect resource competition. Direct interference appears in the summer, probably triggered by each individual's reproductive and hormonal state and the defence of offspring against conspecific and heterospecific intruders. Both interaction forms overlap in the spring, possibly contributing to spring declines in the numbers of subordinate species.
Publishing Year
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Eccard JA, Fey K, Caspers B, Ylonen H. Breeding state and season affect interspecific interaction types: indirect resource competition and direct interference. Oecologia. 2011;167(3):623-633.
Eccard, J. A., Fey, K., Caspers, B., & Ylonen, H. (2011). Breeding state and season affect interspecific interaction types: indirect resource competition and direct interference. Oecologia, 167(3), 623-633.
Eccard, J. A., Fey, K., Caspers, B., and Ylonen, H. (2011). Breeding state and season affect interspecific interaction types: indirect resource competition and direct interference. Oecologia 167, 623-633.
Eccard, J.A., et al., 2011. Breeding state and season affect interspecific interaction types: indirect resource competition and direct interference. Oecologia, 167(3), p 623-633.
J.A. Eccard, et al., “Breeding state and season affect interspecific interaction types: indirect resource competition and direct interference”, Oecologia, vol. 167, 2011, pp. 623-633.
Eccard, J.A., Fey, K., Caspers, B., Ylonen, H.: Breeding state and season affect interspecific interaction types: indirect resource competition and direct interference. Oecologia. 167, 623-633 (2011).
Eccard, Jana A., Fey, Karen, Caspers, Barbara, and Ylonen, Hannu. “Breeding state and season affect interspecific interaction types: indirect resource competition and direct interference”. Oecologia 167.3 (2011): 623-633.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

2 Citations in Europe PMC

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Interactive effects of past and present environments on overwintering success-a reciprocal transplant experiment.
Oksanen TA, Koivula M, Koskela E, Mappes T, Soulsbury CD., Ecol Evol 2(5), 2012
PMID: 22837835

49 References

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Interspecific competition between small rodents in subarctic and boreal ecosystems
Henttonen H, Kaikusalo A, Tast J, Viitala J., 1977
Responses in spatial organisation and behaviour to manipulations of the food resources in the vole Chethrionomys rufocanus
Ims RA., 1987
Winter Coexistence of Clethrionomys gapperi and Microtus pennsylvanicus in a Grassland Habitat
Iverson SL, Turner BN., 1972
Changes in fecundity of thorthern red vole females caused by conspecific males, males or females of gray-sided voles, and weasels
Kaarsalo K, Wallgren H., 1991
Interference competition from house wrens as a factor in the decline of Bewicks wrens
Kennedy ED, White DW., 1996
Red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) released in conifer woodland: the effects of source habitat, predation and interactions with grey squirrels (Sciurus carolinensis)
Kenward RE, Hodder KH., 1998
Territorial behaviour and reproductive success of bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus females
Koskela E, Mappes T, Ylonen H., 1997
Vole diet on experimentally managed afforestation areas in northern Sweden
Larsson TB, Hansson L., 1977
Patterns of nest dispersion in a tropical ground ant community
Leving S, Franks N., 1982
A haunting legacy from isoclines: mammal coexistence and the ghost of competition
Morris DW., 1999
Interactions between the field vole Microtus agrestis and its microtine competitors in Central-Scandinavian populations
Myllymäki A., 1977
Separation of allelopathy and resource competition by the dwarf shrub Empetrum hermaphroditum Hagerup
Nilsson MC., 1994
The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other
Polis GA, Myers CA, Holt RD., 1989
Delayed maturation in female bank voles: optimal decision or social constraint?
Prevot-Julliard AC, Henttonen H, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC., 1999

Rosenzweig ML., 1995
Interspecific interactions: ecological character displacement
Schluter DW., 2001
Field experiments on interspecific competition
Schoener TW., 1983
The effects of the removal of individuals from a population of bank voles Clethrionomys glareolus
Smyth G., 1968
Interference competition and the coexistence of 2 competitors on a single limiting resource
Vance RR., 1984
Interspecific competition in postmetamorphic salamanders: interspecific differences in aggression by coexisting species
Walls SC., 1990
Social organisation of an enclosed winter population of the bank vole Cletrionomys glareolus
Ylönen H, Viitala J., 1985
Social overwintering and food distribution in the bank vole Clethrionomys glareolus
Ylönen H, Viitala J., 1991
Changing female spacing behaviour and demography in an enclosed breeding population of Clethrionomys glareolus
Ylönen H, Kojola T, Viitala J., 1988

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Sources

PMID: 21597944
PubMed | Europe PMC

Search this title in

Google Scholar