Pitfalls in experiments testing predictions from sperm competition theory

Engqvist L, Reinhold K (2005)
Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18(1): 116-123.

Download
OA
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Abstract / Bemerkung
As females of many species mate with more than one male, ejaculates often face competition from the sperm of other males. In recent years, numerous papers have been published on theoretical predictions of evolutionary, behavioural and physiological responses to variation in the strength of sperm competition (SC). These theoretical predictions have also been extensively tested. However, although predictions from SC theory are relatively straightforward, extra caution has to be paid in the design of experiments testing them. One difficulty is for example to disentangle immediate and mean SC risk and intensity. Without carefully designed experiments, it is also very easy to simultaneously increase SC risk and the probability of intense SC - a situation for which we currently have no clear predictions, as the theoretical models to date only assume variation in either SC risk or intensity. In this paper, we discuss these and some other pitfalls related to manipulations of SC risk and intensity and suggest how to avoid them.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Band
18
Zeitschriftennummer
1
Seite
116-123
ISSN
eISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Engqvist L, Reinhold K. Pitfalls in experiments testing predictions from sperm competition theory. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2005;18(1):116-123.
Engqvist, L., & Reinhold, K. (2005). Pitfalls in experiments testing predictions from sperm competition theory. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18(1), 116-123. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00792.x
Engqvist, L., and Reinhold, K. (2005). Pitfalls in experiments testing predictions from sperm competition theory. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 116-123.
Engqvist, L., & Reinhold, K., 2005. Pitfalls in experiments testing predictions from sperm competition theory. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18(1), p 116-123.
L. Engqvist and K. Reinhold, “Pitfalls in experiments testing predictions from sperm competition theory”, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 18, 2005, pp. 116-123.
Engqvist, L., Reinhold, K.: Pitfalls in experiments testing predictions from sperm competition theory. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 18, 116-123 (2005).
Engqvist, Leif, and Reinhold, Klaus. “Pitfalls in experiments testing predictions from sperm competition theory”. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18.1 (2005): 116-123.
Alle Dateien verfügbar unter der/den folgenden Lizenz(en):
Copyright Statement:
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. [...]
Volltext(e)
Access Level
OA Open Access
Zuletzt Hochgeladen
2016-09-28T07:20:01Z

42 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Adaptive plasticity of mammalian sperm production in response to social experience.
Ramm SA, Stockley P., Proc Biol Sci 276(1657), 2009
PMID: 18986975
Sperm competition and maternal effects differentially influence testis and sperm size in Callosobruchus maculatus.
Gay L, Hosken DJ, Vasudev R, Tregenza T, Eady PE., J Evol Biol 22(5), 2009
PMID: 19309491
Sexual conflict: the battle of the sexes reversed.
Kokko H, Jennions MD., Curr Biol 18(3), 2008
PMID: 18269907
Environmental Conditions Affect Sperm Competition Risk in Japanese Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)
Switzer PaulV, Enstrom PatrickC, Schoenick CarissaA., Ann Entomol Soc Am 101(6), 2008
PMID: IND44126932
Male crickets adjust ejaculate quality with both risk and intensity of sperm competition.
Simmons LW, Denholm A, Jackson C, Levy E, Madon E., Biol Lett 3(5), 2007
PMID: 17686757

47 References

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.


Parker, Biol. Rev. 45(), 1970

Parker, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 242(), 1990

Parker, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 253(), 1993

Parker, 1998

Parker, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263(), 1996
Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment.
Parker GA, Ball MA, Stockley P, Gage MJ., Proc. Biol. Sci. 264(1389), 1997
PMID: 9447737
Optimal copula duration in yellow dung flies: effects of female size and egg content.
Parker GA, Simmons LW, Stockley P, McCHRISTIE DM, Charnov EL., Anim Behav 57(4), 1999
PMID: 10202088
Individual adjustment of sperm expenditure accords with sperm competition theory.
Pilastro A, Scaggiante M, Rasotto MB., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99(15), 2002
PMID: 12107282
Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl.
Pizzari T, Cornwallis CK, Lovlie H, Jakobsson S, Birkhead TR., Nature 426(6962), 2003
PMID: 14603319

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0

Simmons, 2001
Ejaculate expenditure by malebush crickets decreases with sperm competition intensity.
Simmons LW, Kvarnemo C., Proc. Biol. Sci. 264(1385), 1997
PMID: PMC1688574

Simmons, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 251(), 1993
Sperm competition games played by dimorphic male beetles.
Simmons LW, Tomkins JL, Hunt J., Proc. Biol. Sci. 266(1415), 1999
PMID: PMC1689655

Smith, 1984

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics.
Stockley P, Gage MJ, Parker GA, Moller AP., Am. Nat. 149(5), 1997
PMID: 18811256

AUTHOR UNKNOWN, 0
Sperm competition in fish: `bourgeois' males and parasitic spawning.
Taborsky M., Trends Ecol. Evol. (Amst.) 13(6), 1998
PMID: 21238275

Warner, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 262(), 1995

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 15669967
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar