Motor Control Strategies in a Continuous Task Space

Schütz C, Weigelt M, Odekerken D, Klein-Soetebier T, Schack T (2011)
Motor Control 15(3): 321-341.

Download
Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
Autor
; ; ; ;
Abstract / Bemerkung
Previous studies on sequential effects of human grasping behavior were restricted to binary grasp type selection. We asked whether two established motor control strategies, the end-state comfort effect and the hysteresis effect, would hold for sequential motor tasks with continuous solutions. To this end, participants were tested in a sequential (predictable) and a randomized (nonpredictable) perceptual-motor task, which offered a continuous range of posture solutions for each movement trial. Both the end-state comfort effect and the hysteresis effect were reproduced under predictable, continuous conditions, but only the end-state comfort effect was present under nonpredictable conditions. Experimental results further revealed a work range restriction effect, which was reproduced for the dominant and the nondominant hand.
Erscheinungsjahr
Zeitschriftentitel
Motor Control
Band
15
Zeitschriftennummer
3
Seite
321-341
ISSN
PUB-ID

Zitieren

Schütz C, Weigelt M, Odekerken D, Klein-Soetebier T, Schack T. Motor Control Strategies in a Continuous Task Space. Motor Control. 2011;15(3):321-341.
Schütz, C., Weigelt, M., Odekerken, D., Klein-Soetebier, T., & Schack, T. (2011). Motor Control Strategies in a Continuous Task Space. Motor Control, 15(3), 321-341.
Schütz, C., Weigelt, M., Odekerken, D., Klein-Soetebier, T., and Schack, T. (2011). Motor Control Strategies in a Continuous Task Space. Motor Control 15, 321-341.
Schütz, C., et al., 2011. Motor Control Strategies in a Continuous Task Space. Motor Control, 15(3), p 321-341.
C. Schütz, et al., “Motor Control Strategies in a Continuous Task Space”, Motor Control, vol. 15, 2011, pp. 321-341.
Schütz, C., Weigelt, M., Odekerken, D., Klein-Soetebier, T., Schack, T.: Motor Control Strategies in a Continuous Task Space. Motor Control. 15, 321-341 (2011).
Schütz, Christoph, Weigelt, Matthias, Odekerken, Dennis, Klein-Soetebier, Timo, and Schack, Thomas. “Motor Control Strategies in a Continuous Task Space”. Motor Control 15.3 (2011): 321-341.

11 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Motor hysteresis in a sequential grasping and pointing task is absent in task-critical joints.
Schütz C, Weigelt M, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 235(3), 2017
PMID: 27864596
Human posterior parietal cortex mediates hand-specific planning.
Valyear KF, Frey SH., Neuroimage 114(), 2015
PMID: 25842294
Movement plans for posture selection do not transfer across hands.
Schütz C, Schack T., Front Psychol 6(), 2015
PMID: 26441734
Hysteresis as an implicit prior in tactile spatial decision making.
Thiel SD, Bitzer S, Nierhaus T, Kalberlah C, Preusser S, Neumann J, Nikulin VV, van der Meer E, Villringer A, Pleger B., PLoS One 9(2), 2014
PMID: 24587045
Prospective and retrospective effects in a virtual pointing task.
Schütz C, Schack T., Acta Psychol (Amst) 142(3), 2013
PMID: 23419809
Motor primitives of pointing movements in a three-dimensional workspace.
Schütz C, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 227(3), 2013
PMID: 23604576
Influence of mechanical load on sequential effects.
Schütz C, Schack T., Exp Brain Res 228(4), 2013
PMID: 23727830
Event-related brain potentials for goal-related power grips.
Westerholz J, Schack T, Koester D., PLoS One 8(7), 2013
PMID: 23844211
Cognition, action, and object manipulation.
Rosenbaum DA, Chapman KM, Weigelt M, Weiss DJ, van der Wel R., Psychol Bull 138(5), 2012
PMID: 22448912

Export

Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®

Quellen

PMID: 21878687
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar