Touch can change visual slant perception

Ernst MO, Banks MS, Bülthoff HH (2000)
Nature Neuroscience 3(1): 69-73.

Es wurde kein Volltext hochgeladen. Nur Publikationsnachweis!
Zeitschriftenaufsatz | Veröffentlicht | Englisch
; ;
Abstract / Bemerkung
The visual system uses several signals to deduce the three-dimensional structure of the environment, including binocular disparity, texture gradients, shading and motion parallax. Although each of these sources of information is independently insufficient to yield reliable three-dimensional structure from everyday scenes, the visual system combines them by weighting the available information; altering the weights would therefore change the perceived structure. We report that haptic feedback (active touch) increases the weight of a consistent surface-slant signal relative to inconsistent signals. Thus, appearance of a subsequently viewed surface is changed: the surface appears slanted in the direction specified by the haptically reinforced signal.
Nature Neuroscience


Ernst MO, Banks MS, Bülthoff HH. Touch can change visual slant perception. Nature Neuroscience. 2000;3(1):69-73.
Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2000). Touch can change visual slant perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3(1), 69-73. doi:10.1038/71140
Ernst, M. O., Banks, M. S., and Bülthoff, H. H. (2000). Touch can change visual slant perception. Nature Neuroscience 3, 69-73.
Ernst, M.O., Banks, M.S., & Bülthoff, H.H., 2000. Touch can change visual slant perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3(1), p 69-73.
M.O. Ernst, M.S. Banks, and H.H. Bülthoff, “Touch can change visual slant perception”, Nature Neuroscience, vol. 3, 2000, pp. 69-73.
Ernst, M.O., Banks, M.S., Bülthoff, H.H.: Touch can change visual slant perception. Nature Neuroscience. 3, 69-73 (2000).
Ernst, Marc O., Banks, MS, and Bülthoff, HH. “Touch can change visual slant perception”. Nature Neuroscience 3.1 (2000): 69-73.

82 Zitationen in Europe PMC

Daten bereitgestellt von Europe PubMed Central.

Comparison of two psychophysical methods across visual and haptic perception of stand-on-ability.
Hajnal A, Olavarria CX, Surber T, Clark JD, Doyon JK., Psychol Res (), 2018
PMID: 30178084
Optimal visual-haptic integration with articulated tools.
Takahashi C, Watt SJ., Exp Brain Res 235(5), 2017
PMID: 28214998
Trust in haptic assistance: weighting visual and haptic cues based on error history.
Gibo TL, Mugge W, Abbink DA., Exp Brain Res 235(8), 2017
PMID: 28534068
Illusory visual-depth reversal can modulate sensations of contact surface.
Igarashi Y, Omori K, Arai T, Aizawa Y., Exp Brain Res 235(10), 2017
PMID: 28721518
Use of cues in virtual reality depends on visual feedback.
Fulvio JM, Rokers B., Sci Rep 7(1), 2017
PMID: 29167491
Touch influences perceived gloss.
Adams WJ, Kerrigan IS, Graf EW., Sci Rep 6(), 2016
PMID: 26915492
Interval timing, temporal averaging, and cue integration.
De Corte BJ, Matell MS., Curr Opin Behav Sci 8(), 2016
PMID: 27175440
Learning What to See in a Changing World.
Schmack K, Weilnhammer V, Heinzle J, Stephan KE, Sterzer P., Front Hum Neurosci 10(), 2016
PMID: 27303285
Recovering stereo vision by squashing virtual bugs in a virtual reality environment.
Vedamurthy I, Knill DC, Huang SJ, Yung A, Ding J, Kwon OS, Bavelier D, Levi DM., Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 371(1697), 2016
PMID: 27269607
Are Effects of Action on Perception Real? Evidence from Transformed Movements.
Kirsch W, Ullrich B, Kunde W., PLoS One 11(12), 2016
PMID: 27977726
Spatiotemporal Processing in Crossmodal Interactions for Perception of the External World: A Review.
Hidaka S, Teramoto W, Sugita Y., Front Integr Neurosci 9(), 2015
PMID: 26733827
A neurocomputational analysis of the sound-induced flash illusion.
Cuppini C, Magosso E, Bolognini N, Vallar G, Ursino M., Neuroimage 92(), 2014
PMID: 24518261
Weight lifting can facilitate appreciative comprehension for museum exhibits.
Yamada Y, Harada S, Choi W, Fujino R, Tokunaga A, Gao Y, Miura K., Front Psychol 5(), 2014
PMID: 24782807
Cross-modal sensory integration of visual-tactile motion information: instrument design and human psychophysics.
Pei YC, Chang TY, Lee TC, Saha S, Lai HY, Gomez-Ramirez M, Chou SW, Wong AM., Sensors (Basel) 13(6), 2013
PMID: 23727955
On the somatosensation of vision.
Manivannan M, Suresh PK., Ann Neurosci 19(1), 2012
PMID: 25205961
Multisensory decision-making in rats and humans.
Raposo D, Sheppard JP, Schrater PR, Churchland AK., J Neurosci 32(11), 2012
PMID: 22423093
Learning from vision-to-touch is different than learning from touch-to-vision.
Wismeijer DA, Gegenfurtner KR, Drewing K., Front Integr Neurosci 6(), 2012
PMID: 23181012
Visual effects of haptic feedback are large but local.
Meng X, Zaidi Q., PLoS One 6(5), 2011
PMID: 21572964
Direct and indirect haptic calibration of visual size judgments.
Gori M, Sciutti A, Burr D, Sandini G., PLoS One 6(10), 2011
PMID: 22022420
Visual learning in multisensory environments.
Jacobs RA, Shams L., Top Cogn Sci 2(2), 2010
PMID: 25163785
Crossmodal influences on visual perception.
Shams L, Kim R., Phys Life Rev 7(3), 2010
PMID: 20447880
Perception of intersensory synchrony: a tutorial review.
Vroomen J, Keetels M., Atten Percept Psychophys 72(4), 2010
PMID: 20436185
Optimality in mono- and multisensory map formation.
Bürck M, Friedel P, Sichert AB, Vossen C, van Hemmen JL., Biol Cybern 103(1), 2010
PMID: 20502911
Uninformative visual experience establishes long term perceptual bias.
Harrison SJ, Backus BT., Vision Res 50(18), 2010
PMID: 20600232
Learning to use an invisible visual signal for perception.
Di Luca M, Ernst MO, Backus BT., Curr Biol 20(20), 2010
PMID: 20933421
The dog's meow: asymmetrical interaction in cross-modal object recognition.
Yuval-Greenberg S, Deouell LY., Exp Brain Res 193(4), 2009
PMID: 19066869
Haptic perception disambiguates visual perception of 3D shape.
Wijntjes MW, Volcic R, Pont SC, Koenderink JJ, Kappers AM., Exp Brain Res 193(4), 2009
PMID: 19199097
Interpretation of optic flows synchronized with observer's hand movements.
Umemura H, Watanabe H., Vision Res 49(8), 2009
PMID: 19285522
Sound enhances touch perception.
Ro T, Hsu J, Yasar NE, Elmore LC, Beauchamp MS., Exp Brain Res 195(1), 2009
PMID: 19305983
The role of visuohaptic experience in visually perceived depth.
Ho YX, Serwe S, Trommershäuser J, Maloney LT, Landy MS., J Neurophysiol 101(6), 2009
PMID: 19357346
What does the illusory-flash look like?
McCormick D, Mamassian P., Vision Res 48(1), 2008
PMID: 18054372
Multi-timescale perceptual history resolves visual ambiguity.
Brascamp JW, Knapen TH, Kanai R, Noest AJ, van Ee R, van Ee R, van den Berg AV., PLoS One 3(1), 2008
PMID: 18231584
Motor control learning in chronic low back pain.
Magnusson ML, Chow DH, Diamandopoulos Z, Pope MH., Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(16), 2008
PMID: 18628693
On the minimum audible difference in direct-to-reverberant energy ratio.
Larsen E, Iyer N, Lansing CR, Feng AS., J Acoust Soc Am 124(1), 2008
PMID: 18646989
A visual-haptic Necker cube reveals temporal constraints on intersensory merging during perceptual exploration.
Bruno N, Jacomuzzi A, Bertamini M, Meyer G., Neuropsychologia 45(3), 2007
PMID: 16527315
Multisensory-mediated auditory localization.
Bolognini N, Leo F, Passamonti C, Stein BE, Làdavas E., Perception 36(10), 2007
PMID: 18265830
Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited.
Sinnett S, Spence C, Soto-Faraco S., Percept Psychophys 69(5), 2007
PMID: 17929691
Judging surface slant for placing objects: a role for motion parallax.
Louw S, Smeets JB, Brenner E., Exp Brain Res 183(2), 2007
PMID: 17632707
Demonstration of cue recruitment: change in visual appearance by means of Pavlovian conditioning.
Haijiang Q, Saunders JA, Stone RW, Backus BT., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(2), 2006
PMID: 16387858
Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception.
Casile A, Giese MA., Curr Biol 16(1), 2006
PMID: 16401424
Ames's window in proprioception.
Bruno N, Dell'Anna A, Jacomuzzi A., Perception 35(1), 2006
PMID: 16491705
Quantitative analysis of accuracy of an inertial/acoustic 6DOF tracking system in motion.
Gilson SJ, Fitzgibbon AW, Glennerster A., J Neurosci Methods 154(1-2), 2006
PMID: 16448700
Ventriloquism aftereffects occur in the rear hemisphere.
Sarlat L, Warusfel O, Viaud-Delmon I., Neurosci Lett 404(3), 2006
PMID: 16806699
Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration.
Smeets JB, van den Dobbelsteen JJ, de Grave DD, van Beers RJ, Brenner E., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(49), 2006
PMID: 17130453
Generating complex three-dimensional stimuli (Greebles) for haptic expertise training.
James TW, Shima DW, Tarr MJ, Gauthier I., Behav Res Methods 37(2), 2005
PMID: 16171207
Touch-induced visual illusion.
Violentyev A, Shimojo S, Shams L., Neuroreport 16(10), 2005
PMID: 15973157
Visual enhancing of tactile perception in the posterior parietal cortex.
Ro T, Wallace R, Hagedorn J, Farnè A, Pienkos E., J Cogn Neurosci 16(1), 2004
PMID: 15006033
Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links.
Deneve S, Pouget A., J Physiol Paris 98(1-3), 2004
PMID: 15477036
Crossmodal integration for perception and action.
Lalanne C, Lorenceau J., J Physiol Paris 98(1-3), 2004
PMID: 15477038
Merging the senses into a robust percept.
Ernst MO, Bülthoff HH., Trends Cogn Sci 8(4), 2004
PMID: 15050512
Task requirements influence sensory integration during grasping in humans.
Säfström D, Edin BB., Learn Mem 11(3), 2004
PMID: 15169866
Neural synergy between kinetic vision and touch.
Blake R, Sobel KV, James TW., Psychol Sci 15(6), 2004
PMID: 15147493
Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction.
Heron J, Whitaker D, McGraw PV., Vision Res 44(25), 2004
PMID: 15380993
Modification of depth and distance perception caused by long-term wearing of left-right reversing spectacles.
Ichikawa M, Kimura T, Egusa H, Nakatsuka M, Amano J, Ueda T, Tashiro T., Perception 32(2), 2003
PMID: 12696661
Fast temporal dynamics of visual cue integration.
Triesch J, Ballard DH, Jacobs RA., Perception 31(4), 2002
PMID: 12018788
Three-dimensional orientation tuning in macaque area V4.
Hinkle DA, Connor CE., Nat Neurosci 5(7), 2002
PMID: 12068303
What determines visual cue reliability?
Jacobs RA., Trends Cogn Sci 6(8), 2002
PMID: 12140085
Ambiguity and the 'mental eye' in pictorial relief.
Koenderink JJ, van Doorn AJ, Kappers AM, Todd JT., Perception 30(4), 2001
PMID: 11383191
Democratic integration: self-organized integration of adaptive cues.
Triesch J, von der Malsburg C., Neural Comput 13(9), 2001
PMID: 11516357


Markieren/ Markierung löschen
Markierte Publikationen

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

Dieser Datensatz im Web of Science®


PMID: 10607397
PubMed | Europe PMC

Suchen in

Google Scholar