Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention

Helbig HB, Ernst MO (2008)
Journal of Vision 8(1): 21.

Download
No fulltext has been uploaded. References only!
Journal Article | Original Article | Published | English

No fulltext has been uploaded

Author
;
Abstract / Notes
Some object properties (e. g., size, shape, and depth information) are perceived through multiple sensory modalities. Such redundant sensory information is integrated into a unified percept. The integrated estimate is a weighted average of the sensory estimates, where higher weight is attributed to the more reliable sensory signal. Here we examine whether modality-specific attention can affect multisensory integration. Selectively reducing attention in one sensory channel can reduce the relative reliability of the estimate derived from this channel and might thus alter the weighting of the sensory estimates. In the present study, observers performed unimodal (visual and haptic) and bimodal (visual-haptic) size discrimination tasks. They either performed the primary task alone or they performed a secondary task simultaneously (dual task). The secondary task consisted of a same/different judgment of rapidly presented visual letter sequences, and so might be expected to withdraw attention predominantly from the visual rather than the haptic channel. Comparing size discrimination performance in single- and dual-task conditions, we found that vision-based estimates were more affected by the secondary task than the haptics-based estimates, indicating that indeed attention to vision was more reduced than attention to haptics. This attentional manipulation, however, did not affect the cue weighting in the bimodal task. Bimodal discrimination performance was better than unimodal performance in both single- and dual-task conditions, indicating that observers still integrate visual and haptic size information in the dual-task condition, when attention is withdrawn from vision. These findings indicate that visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention.
Publishing Year
ISSN
PUB-ID

Cite this

Helbig HB, Ernst MO. Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention. Journal of Vision. 2008;8(1):21.
Helbig, H. B., & Ernst, M. O. (2008). Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention. Journal of Vision, 8(1), 21. doi:10.1167/8.1.21
Helbig, H. B., and Ernst, M. O. (2008). Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention. Journal of Vision 8, 21.
Helbig, H.B., & Ernst, M.O., 2008. Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention. Journal of Vision, 8(1), p 21.
H.B. Helbig and M.O. Ernst, “Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention”, Journal of Vision, vol. 8, 2008, pp. 21.
Helbig, H.B., Ernst, M.O.: Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention. Journal of Vision. 8, 21 (2008).
Helbig, Hannah B., and Ernst, Marc O. “Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention”. Journal of Vision 8.1 (2008): 21.
This data publication is cited in the following publications:
This publication cites the following data publications:

16 Citations in Europe PMC

Data provided by Europe PubMed Central.

Auditory Stimulus Detection Partially Depends on Visuospatial Attentional Resources.
Wahn B, Murali S, Sinnett S, König P., Iperception 8(1), 2017
PMID: 28203353
Can Limitations of Visuospatial Attention Be Circumvented? A Review.
Wahn B, König P., Front Psychol 8(), 2017
PMID: 29163278
Visual and haptic integration in the estimation of softness of deformable objects.
Cellini C, Kaim L, Drewing K., Iperception 4(8), 2013
PMID: 25165510
Continuous evolution of statistical estimators for optimal decision-making.
Saunders I, Vijayakumar S., PLoS One 7(6), 2012
PMID: 22761657
Testing the limits of optimal integration of visual and proprioceptive information of path trajectory.
Reuschel J, Rösler F, Henriques DY, Fiehler K., Exp Brain Res 209(4), 2011
PMID: 21347659
Optimal integration of visual and proprioceptive movement information for the perception of trajectory geometry.
Reuschel J, Drewing K, Henriques DY, Rösler F, Fiehler K., Exp Brain Res 201(4), 2010
PMID: 19953230
Vision, haptics, and attention: new data from a multisensory Necker cube.
Bertamini M, Masala L, Meyer G, Bruno N., Perception 39(2), 2010
PMID: 20402242
Neural substrates of reliability-weighted visual-tactile multisensory integration.
Beauchamp MS, Pasalar S, Ro T., Front Syst Neurosci 4(), 2010
PMID: 20631844

Export

0 Marked Publications

Open Data PUB

Web of Science

View record in Web of Science®

Sources

PMID: 18318624
PubMed | Europe PMC

Search this title in

Google Scholar